Again, you're way off the mark. 70% over the average resting HR of 70 is a whopping 120 beats per minute. Only a fragile 80 year-old couldn't handle that. That, three times a week for 30 min, is barely worth the trouble. Any normal healthy adult should have no problem getting their HR up around 60-70% of max for an hour or so a few times a week. That will burn plenty of calories.Originally posted by: HumblePie
Uh, bullsh*t, bullsh*t, and bullsh*t. Running and cycling can burn upwards of 1000 kcals per hour. And the lactic acid, "cortzone", "rest mode" thing is just comical, sorry.
Uhhh.. LOL. If you are getting that off a machine telling you how many calories you "burned" then you are using a broken machine. You don't burn that many calories with exercise unless you can keep up the exercise and an higher then average heartrate (at least 70% higher then normal) for hours on end. Unless you are doing the Tour De France, that isn't going to happen. The recommended exercise is for 30 minutes at 3 times a week. This means keeping your heart rate up past 70% of it's normal rate for an entire 30 minutes. Guess how many calories you burn during this time? A few hundred like I poined out above if you are lucky. In an hour you can do 400 to maybe 500 calories if you can maintain a strenous activity for tha time frame.
What I'm getting at here is that you're hinging weight on food rather than exercise. While you are technically correct that everyone should be able to just eat right and maintain a healthy weight without all that pesky running around and sweating, this basically doesn't happen in reality. Most people will feel hungry if they follow this sort of diet. Eventually their willpower gives out, and they fall off the wagon. This is why just dieting almost invariably fails.
With exercise (and not the pathetic regimen you're describing), you give yourself a higher caloric ceiling each day thanks to the calories burned during exercise. As such, one can eat a relatively "normal" diet, feel full, and still lose weight. On top of this, you get all the neat benefits of exercise like lowered cholesterol.....bp......the nice endorphin buzz.....better endurance in the sack....etc.
See above. Exercise + diet > just diet. All goes back to people's lack of willpower. I never said you could exercise and then live on Butter-Flavor Crisco.I did make another mistake. Yes you CAN lose weight through exercise, but it is extremely difficult and time consuming. It takes HOURS every day to do this. Even still, if you eat more calories then you use, it doesn't matter how much exercise you get. I could workout straight for 8 hours a day and as long as I'm munching down a 700 calorie Jumbo Jack with cheese every hour on the hour I'll still GAIN fat weight.
I could also go to sleep for the next 2 weeks and lose over 5 pounds of fat since I have no calorie intake. Yet, sleeping for 2 weeks is definately not exercise.
Again, you're demonizing exercise. Which is why I'm labeling you an idiot. :roll:As for effects of exercise afterwards. LOL, if you choose not to "believe" thats your perogative. It doesn't change the facts on the subject. Exercise causes your body to produce many chemicals during and afterwards. Many of these are the same chemicals produced during "stress" which is a failed release of the fight or flight response. Many cause your body to have an urge to eat or sleep. If not sleep at the very least to rest.