US foreign policy explained to a child

Maverick

Diamond Member
Jun 14, 2000
5,900
0
76
Someone sent me this forward...I found it amusing:


Q: Daddy, why did we have to attack Iraq?

A: Because they had weapons of mass destruction honey.

Q: But the inspectors didn't find any weapons of mass destruction.

A: That's because the Iraqis were hiding them.

Q: And that's why we invaded Iraq?

A: Yep. Invasions always work better than inspections.

Q: But after we invaded them, we STILL didn't find any weapons of mass

destruction, did we?

A: That's because the weapons are so well hidden. Don't worry, we'll find

something, probably right before the 2004 election.





Q: Why did Iraq want all those weapons of mass destruction?

A: To use them in a war, silly.

Q: I'm confused. If they had all those weapons that they planned to use in a

war, then why didn't they use any of those weapons when we went to war with

them?





A: Well, obviously they didn't want anyone to know they had those weapons,

so they chose to die by the thousands rather than defend themselves.





Q: That doesn't make sense Daddy. Why would they choose to die if they had

all those big weapons to fight us back with?

A: It's a different culture. It's not supposed to make sense.

Q: I don't know about you, but I don't think they had any of those weapons

our government said they did.

A: Well, you know, it doesn't matter whether or not they had those weapons.

We had another good reason to invade them anyway.





Q: And what was that?

A: Even if Iraq didn't have weapons of mass destruction, Saddam Hussein was

a cruel dictator, which is another good reason to invade another country.





Q: Why? What does a cruel dictator do that makes it OK to invade his

country?

A: Well, for one thing, he tortured his own people.

Q: Kind of like what they do in China?

A: Don't go comparing China to Iraq. China is a good economic competitor,

where millions of people work for slave wages in sweatshops to make U.S.

corporations richer.





Q: So if a country lets its people be exploited for American corporate gain,

it's a good country, even if that country tortures people?





A: Right.

Q: Why were people in Iraq being tortured?

A: For political crimes, mostly, like criticizing the government. People who

criticized the government in Iraq were sent to prison and tortured.





Q: Isn't that exactly what happens in China?

A: I told you, China is different..

Q: What's the difference between China and Iraq?

A: Well, for one thing, Iraq was ruled by the Ba'ath party, while China is

Communist.

Q: Didn't you once tell me Communists were bad?

A: No, just Cuban Communists are bad.

Q: How are the Cuban Communists bad.

A: Well, for one thing, people who criticize the government in Cuba are sent

to prison and tortured.

Q: Like in Iraq?

A: Exactly.

Q: And like in China, too?

A: I told you, China's a good economic competitor. Cuba, on the other hand,

is not.

Q: How come Cuba isn't a good economic competitor?

A: Well, you see, back in the early 1960s, our government passed some laws

that made it illegal for Americans to trade or do any business with Cuba

until they stopped being Communists and started being capitalists like us.





Q: But if we got rid of those laws, opened up trade with Cuba, and started

doing business with them, wouldn't that help the Cubans become capitalists?





A: Don't be a smart-ass.

Q: I didn't think I was being one..

A: Well, anyway, they also don't have freedom of religion in Cuba.

Q : Kind of like China and the Falun Gong movement?

A: I told you, stop saying bad things about China. Anyway, Saddam Hussein

came to power through a military coup, so he's not really a legitimate

leader anyway.





Q: What's a military coup?

A: That's when a military general takes over the government of a country by

force, instead of holding free elections like we do in the United States.





Q: Didn't the ruler of Pakistan come to power by a military coup?

A: You mean General Pervez Musharraf? Uh, yeah, he did, but Pakistan is our

friend.

Q: Why is Pakistan our friend if their leader is illegitimate?

A: I never said Pervez Musharraf was illegitimate.

Q: Didn't you just say a military general who comes to power by forcibly

overthrowing the legitimate government of a nation is an illegitimate

leader?





A: Only Saddam Hussein. Pervez Musharraf is our friend, because he helped us

invade Afghanistan.

Q: Why did we invade Afghanistan?

A: Because of what they did to us on September 11th.

Q: What did Afghanistan do to us on September 11th?

A: Well, on September 11th, nineteen men, fifteen of them Saudi Arabians

hijacked four airplanes and flew three of them into buildings, killing over

3,000 Americans.





Q: So how did Afghanistan figure into all that?

A: Afghanistan was where those bad men trained, under the oppressive rule of

the Taliban.

Q: Aren't the Taliban those bad radical Islamics who chopped off people's

heads and hands?

A: Yes, that's exactly who they were. Not only did they chop off people's

heads and hands, but they oppressed women, too.





Q: Didn't the Bush administration give the Taliban 43 million back in May of

2001?

A: Yes, but that money was a reward because they did such a good job

fighting drugs.

Q: Fighting drugs?

A: Yes, the Taliban were very helpful in stopping people from growing opium

poppies.

Q: How did they do such a good job?

A: Simple. If people were caught growing opium poppies, the Taliban would

have their hands and heads cut off.

Q: So, when the Taliban cut off people's heads and hands for growing

flowers, that was OK, but not if they cut people's heads and hands off for

other reasons?





A: Yes. It's OK with us if radical Islamic fundamentalists cut off people's

hands for growing flowers, but it's cruel if they cut off people's hands for

stealing bread.





Q: Don't they also cut off people's hands and heads in Saudi Arabia?

A: That's different. Afghanistan was ruled by a tyrannical patriarchy that

oppressed women and forced them to wear burqas whenever they were in public,

with death by stoning as the penalty for women who did not comply.





Q: Don't Saudi women have to wear burqas in public, too?

A: No, Saudi women merely wear a traditional Islamic body covering.

Q: What's the difference?

A: The traditional Islamic covering worn by Saudi women is a modest yet

fashionable garment that covers all of a woman's body except for her eyes

and fingers. The burqa, on the other hand, is an evil tool of patriarchal

oppression that covers all of a woman's body except for her eyes and

fingers.





Q: It sounds like the same thing with a different name.

A: Now, don't go comparing Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia. The Saudis are our

friends.

Q: But I thought you said 15 of the 19 hijackers on September 11th were from

Saudi Arabia.

A: Yes, but they trained in Afghanistan.

Q: Who trained them?

A: A very bad man named Osama bin Laden.

Q: Was he from Afghanistan?

A: Uh, no, he was from Saudi Arabia too. But he was a bad man, a very bad

man.

Q: I seem to recall he was our friend once.

A: Only when we helped him and the mujahadeen repel the Soviet invasion of

Afghanistan back in the 1980s.

Q: Who are the Soviets? Was that the Evil Communist Empire Ronald Reagan

talked about?

A: There are no more Soviets. The Soviet Union broke up in 1990 or

thereabouts, and now they have elections and capitalism like us. We call

them Russians now.





Q: So the Soviets - I mean, the Russians - are now our friends?

A: Well, not really. You see, they were our friends for many years after

they stopped being Soviets, but then they decided not to support our

invasion of Iraq, so we're mad at them now. We're also mad at the French and

the Germans because they didn't help us invade Iraq either.





Q: So the French and Germans are evil, too?

A: Not exactly evil, but just bad enough that we had to rename French fries

and French toast to Freedom Fries and Freedom Toast.





Q: Do we always rename foods whenever another country doesn't do what we

want them to do?

A: No, we just do that to our friends. Our enemies, we invade.

Q: But wasn't Iraq one of our friends back in the1980s?

A: Well, yeah. For a while.

Q: Was Saddam Hussein ruler of Iraq back then?

A: Yes, but at the time he was fighting against Iran, which made him our

friend, temporarily.

Q: Why did that make him our friend?

Q: Isn't that when he gassed the Kurds?

A: Yeah, but since he was fighting against Iran at the time, we looked the

other way, to show him we were his friend.

Q: So anyone who fights against one of our enemies automatically becomes our

friend?

A: Most of the time, yes.

Q: And anyone who fights against one of our friends is automatically an

enemy?

A: Sometimes that's true, too. However, if American corporations can profit

by selling weapons to both sides at the same time, all the better.





Q: Why?

A: Because war is good for the economy, which means war is good for America.

Also, since God is on America's side, anyone who opposes war is a godless

un-American Communist. Do you understand now why we attacked Iraq?





Q: I think so. We attacked them because God wanted us to, right?

A: Yes.

Q: But how did we know God wanted us to attack Iraq?

A: Well, you see, God personally speaks to George W. Bush and tells him what

to do.

Q: So basically, what you're saying is that we attacked Iraq because George

W. Bush hears voices in his head?

A. Yes! You finally understand how the world works. Now close your eyes,

make yourself comfortable, and go to sleep. Good night.

 

Sternfan

Senior member
May 24, 2003
203
0
0
Originally posted by: Shiva112
Someone sent me this forward...I found it amusing:


Q: Daddy, why did we have to attack Iraq?

A: Because they had weapons of mass destruction honey.

Q: But the inspectors didn't find any weapons of mass destruction.

A: That's because the Iraqis were hiding them.

Q: And that's why we invaded Iraq?

A: Yep. Invasions always work better than inspections.

Q: But after we invaded them, we STILL didn't find any weapons of mass

destruction, did we?

A: That's because the weapons are so well hidden. Don't worry, we'll find

something, probably right before the 2004 election.





Q: Why did Iraq want all those weapons of mass destruction?

A: To use them in a war, silly.

Q: I'm confused. If they had all those weapons that they planned to use in a

war, then why didn't they use any of those weapons when we went to war with

them?





A: Well, obviously they didn't want anyone to know they had those weapons,

so they chose to die by the thousands rather than defend themselves.





Q: That doesn't make sense Daddy. Why would they choose to die if they had

all those big weapons to fight us back with?

A: It's a different culture. It's not supposed to make sense.

Q: I don't know about you, but I don't think they had any of those weapons

our government said they did.

A: Well, you know, it doesn't matter whether or not they had those weapons.

We had another good reason to invade them anyway.





Q: And what was that?

A: Even if Iraq didn't have weapons of mass destruction, Saddam Hussein was

a cruel dictator, which is another good reason to invade another country.





Q: Why? What does a cruel dictator do that makes it OK to invade his

country?

A: Well, for one thing, he tortured his own people.

Q: Kind of like what they do in China?

A: Don't go comparing China to Iraq. China is a good economic competitor,

where millions of people work for slave wages in sweatshops to make U.S.

corporations richer.





Q: So if a country lets its people be exploited for American corporate gain,

it's a good country, even if that country tortures people?





A: Right.

Q: Why were people in Iraq being tortured?

A: For political crimes, mostly, like criticizing the government. People who

criticized the government in Iraq were sent to prison and tortured.





Q: Isn't that exactly what happens in China?

A: I told you, China is different..

Q: What's the difference between China and Iraq?

A: Well, for one thing, Iraq was ruled by the Ba'ath party, while China is

Communist.

Q: Didn't you once tell me Communists were bad?

A: No, just Cuban Communists are bad.

Q: How are the Cuban Communists bad.

A: Well, for one thing, people who criticize the government in Cuba are sent

to prison and tortured.

Q: Like in Iraq?

A: Exactly.

Q: And like in China, too?

A: I told you, China's a good economic competitor. Cuba, on the other hand,

is not.

Q: How come Cuba isn't a good economic competitor?

A: Well, you see, back in the early 1960s, our government passed some laws

that made it illegal for Americans to trade or do any business with Cuba

until they stopped being Communists and started being capitalists like us.





Q: But if we got rid of those laws, opened up trade with Cuba, and started

doing business with them, wouldn't that help the Cubans become capitalists?





A: Don't be a smart-ass.

Q: I didn't think I was being one..

A: Well, anyway, they also don't have freedom of religion in Cuba.

Q : Kind of like China and the Falun Gong movement?

A: I told you, stop saying bad things about China. Anyway, Saddam Hussein

came to power through a military coup, so he's not really a legitimate

leader anyway.





Q: What's a military coup?

A: That's when a military general takes over the government of a country by

force, instead of holding free elections like we do in the United States.





Q: Didn't the ruler of Pakistan come to power by a military coup?

A: You mean General Pervez Musharraf? Uh, yeah, he did, but Pakistan is our

friend.

Q: Why is Pakistan our friend if their leader is illegitimate?

A: I never said Pervez Musharraf was illegitimate.

Q: Didn't you just say a military general who comes to power by forcibly

overthrowing the legitimate government of a nation is an illegitimate

leader?





A: Only Saddam Hussein. Pervez Musharraf is our friend, because he helped us

invade Afghanistan.

Q: Why did we invade Afghanistan?

A: Because of what they did to us on September 11th.

Q: What did Afghanistan do to us on September 11th?

A: Well, on September 11th, nineteen men, fifteen of them Saudi Arabians

hijacked four airplanes and flew three of them into buildings, killing over

3,000 Americans.





Q: So how did Afghanistan figure into all that?

A: Afghanistan was where those bad men trained, under the oppressive rule of

the Taliban.

Q: Aren't the Taliban those bad radical Islamics who chopped off people's

heads and hands?

A: Yes, that's exactly who they were. Not only did they chop off people's

heads and hands, but they oppressed women, too.





Q: Didn't the Bush administration give the Taliban 43 million back in May of

2001?

A: Yes, but that money was a reward because they did such a good job

fighting drugs.

Q: Fighting drugs?

A: Yes, the Taliban were very helpful in stopping people from growing opium

poppies.

Q: How did they do such a good job?

A: Simple. If people were caught growing opium poppies, the Taliban would

have their hands and heads cut off.

Q: So, when the Taliban cut off people's heads and hands for growing

flowers, that was OK, but not if they cut people's heads and hands off for

other reasons?





A: Yes. It's OK with us if radical Islamic fundamentalists cut off people's

hands for growing flowers, but it's cruel if they cut off people's hands for

stealing bread.





Q: Don't they also cut off people's hands and heads in Saudi Arabia?

A: That's different. Afghanistan was ruled by a tyrannical patriarchy that

oppressed women and forced them to wear burqas whenever they were in public,

with death by stoning as the penalty for women who did not comply.





Q: Don't Saudi women have to wear burqas in public, too?

A: No, Saudi women merely wear a traditional Islamic body covering.

Q: What's the difference?

A: The traditional Islamic covering worn by Saudi women is a modest yet

fashionable garment that covers all of a woman's body except for her eyes

and fingers. The burqa, on the other hand, is an evil tool of patriarchal

oppression that covers all of a woman's body except for her eyes and

fingers.





Q: It sounds like the same thing with a different name.

A: Now, don't go comparing Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia. The Saudis are our

friends.

Q: But I thought you said 15 of the 19 hijackers on September 11th were from

Saudi Arabia.

A: Yes, but they trained in Afghanistan.

Q: Who trained them?

A: A very bad man named Osama bin Laden.

Q: Was he from Afghanistan?

A: Uh, no, he was from Saudi Arabia too. But he was a bad man, a very bad

man.

Q: I seem to recall he was our friend once.

A: Only when we helped him and the mujahadeen repel the Soviet invasion of

Afghanistan back in the 1980s.

Q: Who are the Soviets? Was that the Evil Communist Empire Ronald Reagan

talked about?

A: There are no more Soviets. The Soviet Union broke up in 1990 or

thereabouts, and now they have elections and capitalism like us. We call

them Russians now.





Q: So the Soviets - I mean, the Russians - are now our friends?

A: Well, not really. You see, they were our friends for many years after

they stopped being Soviets, but then they decided not to support our

invasion of Iraq, so we're mad at them now. We're also mad at the French and

the Germans because they didn't help us invade Iraq either.





Q: So the French and Germans are evil, too?

A: Not exactly evil, but just bad enough that we had to rename French fries

and French toast to Freedom Fries and Freedom Toast.





Q: Do we always rename foods whenever another country doesn't do what we

want them to do?

A: No, we just do that to our friends. Our enemies, we invade.

Q: But wasn't Iraq one of our friends back in the1980s?

A: Well, yeah. For a while.

Q: Was Saddam Hussein ruler of Iraq back then?

A: Yes, but at the time he was fighting against Iran, which made him our

friend, temporarily.

Q: Why did that make him our friend?

Q: Isn't that when he gassed the Kurds?

A: Yeah, but since he was fighting against Iran at the time, we looked the

other way, to show him we were his friend.

Q: So anyone who fights against one of our enemies automatically becomes our

friend?

A: Most of the time, yes.

Q: And anyone who fights against one of our friends is automatically an

enemy?

A: Sometimes that's true, too. However, if American corporations can profit

by selling weapons to both sides at the same time, all the better.





Q: Why?

A: Because war is good for the economy, which means war is good for America.

Also, since God is on America's side, anyone who opposes war is a godless

un-American Communist. Do you understand now why we attacked Iraq?





Q: I think so. We attacked them because God wanted us to, right?

A: Yes.

Q: But how did we know God wanted us to attack Iraq?

A: Well, you see, God personally speaks to George W. Bush and tells him what

to do.

Q: So basically, what you're saying is that we attacked Iraq because George

W. Bush hears voices in his head?

A. Yes! You finally understand how the world works. Now close your eyes,

make yourself comfortable, and go to sleep. Good night.

Well I guess they sent it to you because you have the mind of a child, a retarded child but a child never the less.

 

Orsorum

Lifer
Dec 26, 2001
27,631
5
81
Originally posted by: Sternfan
Well I guess they sent it to you because you have the mind of a child, a retarded child but a child never the less.

I would be interested to see your point by point refutation.
 

Sarcasticor

Banned
Aug 9, 2003
109
0
0
Originally posted by: Orsorum
Originally posted by: Sternfan
Well I guess they sent it to you because you have the mind of a child, a retarded child but a child never the less.

I would be interested to see your point by point refutation.

Yup, that's the sad thing about the story.
 

chrisms

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2003
6,615
0
0
I'd just like to say that people who quote the original post, especially the ones which are very long, are jackasses.
 

Sternfan

Senior member
May 24, 2003
203
0
0
Originally posted by: Shiva112
Someone sent me this forward...I found it amusing:


Q: Daddy, why did we have to attack Iraq?

A: Because they had weapons of mass destruction honey.

Q: But the inspectors didn't find any weapons of mass destruction.

A: That's because the Iraqis were hiding them.

Q: And that's why we invaded Iraq?

A: Yep. Invasions always work better than inspections.

Q: But after we invaded them, we STILL didn't find any weapons of mass

destruction, did we?

A: That's because the weapons are so well hidden. Don't worry, we'll find

something, probably right before the 2004 election.





Q: Why did Iraq want all those weapons of mass destruction?

A: To use them in a war, silly.

Q: I'm confused. If they had all those weapons that they planned to use in a

war, then why didn't they use any of those weapons when we went to war with

them?





A: Well, obviously they didn't want anyone to know they had those weapons,

so they chose to die by the thousands rather than defend themselves.





Q: That doesn't make sense Daddy. Why would they choose to die if they had

all those big weapons to fight us back with?

A: It's a different culture. It's not supposed to make sense.

Q: I don't know about you, but I don't think they had any of those weapons

our government said they did.

A: Well, you know, it doesn't matter whether or not they had those weapons.

We had another good reason to invade them anyway.





Q: And what was that?

A: Even if Iraq didn't have weapons of mass destruction, Saddam Hussein was

a cruel dictator, which is another good reason to invade another country.





Q: Why? What does a cruel dictator do that makes it OK to invade his

country?

A: Well, for one thing, he tortured his own people.

Q: Kind of like what they do in China?

A: Don't go comparing China to Iraq. China is a good economic competitor,

where millions of people work for slave wages in sweatshops to make U.S.

corporations richer.





Q: So if a country lets its people be exploited for American corporate gain,

it's a good country, even if that country tortures people?





A: Right.

Q: Why were people in Iraq being tortured?

A: For political crimes, mostly, like criticizing the government. People who

criticized the government in Iraq were sent to prison and tortured.





Q: Isn't that exactly what happens in China?

A: I told you, China is different..

Q: What's the difference between China and Iraq?

A: Well, for one thing, Iraq was ruled by the Ba'ath party, while China is

Communist.

Q: Didn't you once tell me Communists were bad?

A: No, just Cuban Communists are bad.

Q: How are the Cuban Communists bad.

A: Well, for one thing, people who criticize the government in Cuba are sent

to prison and tortured.

Q: Like in Iraq?

A: Exactly.

Q: And like in China, too?

A: I told you, China's a good economic competitor. Cuba, on the other hand,

is not.

Q: How come Cuba isn't a good economic competitor?

A: Well, you see, back in the early 1960s, our government passed some laws

that made it illegal for Americans to trade or do any business with Cuba

until they stopped being Communists and started being capitalists like us.





Q: But if we got rid of those laws, opened up trade with Cuba, and started

doing business with them, wouldn't that help the Cubans become capitalists?





A: Don't be a smart-ass.

Q: I didn't think I was being one..

A: Well, anyway, they also don't have freedom of religion in Cuba.

Q : Kind of like China and the Falun Gong movement?

A: I told you, stop saying bad things about China. Anyway, Saddam Hussein

came to power through a military coup, so he's not really a legitimate

leader anyway.





Q: What's a military coup?

A: That's when a military general takes over the government of a country by

force, instead of holding free elections like we do in the United States.





Q: Didn't the ruler of Pakistan come to power by a military coup?

A: You mean General Pervez Musharraf? Uh, yeah, he did, but Pakistan is our

friend.

Q: Why is Pakistan our friend if their leader is illegitimate?

A: I never said Pervez Musharraf was illegitimate.

Q: Didn't you just say a military general who comes to power by forcibly

overthrowing the legitimate government of a nation is an illegitimate

leader?





A: Only Saddam Hussein. Pervez Musharraf is our friend, because he helped us

invade Afghanistan.

Q: Why did we invade Afghanistan?

A: Because of what they did to us on September 11th.

Q: What did Afghanistan do to us on September 11th?

A: Well, on September 11th, nineteen men, fifteen of them Saudi Arabians

hijacked four airplanes and flew three of them into buildings, killing over

3,000 Americans.





Q: So how did Afghanistan figure into all that?

A: Afghanistan was where those bad men trained, under the oppressive rule of

the Taliban.

Q: Aren't the Taliban those bad radical Islamics who chopped off people's

heads and hands?

A: Yes, that's exactly who they were. Not only did they chop off people's

heads and hands, but they oppressed women, too.





Q: Didn't the Bush administration give the Taliban 43 million back in May of

2001?

A: Yes, but that money was a reward because they did such a good job

fighting drugs.

Q: Fighting drugs?

A: Yes, the Taliban were very helpful in stopping people from growing opium

poppies.

Q: How did they do such a good job?

A: Simple. If people were caught growing opium poppies, the Taliban would

have their hands and heads cut off.

Q: So, when the Taliban cut off people's heads and hands for growing

flowers, that was OK, but not if they cut people's heads and hands off for

other reasons?





A: Yes. It's OK with us if radical Islamic fundamentalists cut off people's

hands for growing flowers, but it's cruel if they cut off people's hands for

stealing bread.





Q: Don't they also cut off people's hands and heads in Saudi Arabia?

A: That's different. Afghanistan was ruled by a tyrannical patriarchy that

oppressed women and forced them to wear burqas whenever they were in public,

with death by stoning as the penalty for women who did not comply.





Q: Don't Saudi women have to wear burqas in public, too?

A: No, Saudi women merely wear a traditional Islamic body covering.

Q: What's the difference?

A: The traditional Islamic covering worn by Saudi women is a modest yet

fashionable garment that covers all of a woman's body except for her eyes

and fingers. The burqa, on the other hand, is an evil tool of patriarchal

oppression that covers all of a woman's body except for her eyes and

fingers.





Q: It sounds like the same thing with a different name.

A: Now, don't go comparing Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia. The Saudis are our

friends.

Q: But I thought you said 15 of the 19 hijackers on September 11th were from

Saudi Arabia.

A: Yes, but they trained in Afghanistan.

Q: Who trained them?

A: A very bad man named Osama bin Laden.

Q: Was he from Afghanistan?

A: Uh, no, he was from Saudi Arabia too. But he was a bad man, a very bad

man.

Q: I seem to recall he was our friend once.

A: Only when we helped him and the mujahadeen repel the Soviet invasion of

Afghanistan back in the 1980s.

Q: Who are the Soviets? Was that the Evil Communist Empire Ronald Reagan

talked about?

A: There are no more Soviets. The Soviet Union broke up in 1990 or

thereabouts, and now they have elections and capitalism like us. We call

them Russians now.





Q: So the Soviets - I mean, the Russians - are now our friends?

A: Well, not really. You see, they were our friends for many years after

they stopped being Soviets, but then they decided not to support our

invasion of Iraq, so we're mad at them now. We're also mad at the French and

the Germans because they didn't help us invade Iraq either.





Q: So the French and Germans are evil, too?

A: Not exactly evil, but just bad enough that we had to rename French fries

and French toast to Freedom Fries and Freedom Toast.





Q: Do we always rename foods whenever another country doesn't do what we

want them to do?

A: No, we just do that to our friends. Our enemies, we invade.

Q: But wasn't Iraq one of our friends back in the1980s?

A: Well, yeah. For a while.

Q: Was Saddam Hussein ruler of Iraq back then?

A: Yes, but at the time he was fighting against Iran, which made him our

friend, temporarily.

Q: Why did that make him our friend?

Q: Isn't that when he gassed the Kurds?

A: Yeah, but since he was fighting against Iran at the time, we looked the

other way, to show him we were his friend.

Q: So anyone who fights against one of our enemies automatically becomes our

friend?

A: Most of the time, yes.

Q: And anyone who fights against one of our friends is automatically an

enemy?

A: Sometimes that's true, too. However, if American corporations can profit

by selling weapons to both sides at the same time, all the better.





Q: Why?

A: Because war is good for the economy, which means war is good for America.

Also, since God is on America's side, anyone who opposes war is a godless

un-American Communist. Do you understand now why we attacked Iraq?





Q: I think so. We attacked them because God wanted us to, right?

A: Yes.

Q: But how did we know God wanted us to attack Iraq?

A: Well, you see, God personally speaks to George W. Bush and tells him what

to do.

Q: So basically, what you're saying is that we attacked Iraq because George

W. Bush hears voices in his head?

A. Yes! You finally understand how the world works. Now close your eyes,

make yourself comfortable, and go to sleep. Good night.


Huh?
 

etech

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
10,597
0
0
If I were a child I might find that drivel amusing.

It's all been refuted before on this board. If you can't find the flaws in it yourself, do a search.
 

Flyermax2k3

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2003
3,204
0
0
Originally posted by: etech
If I were a child I might find that drivel amusing.

It's all been refuted before on this board. If you can't find the flaws in it yourself, do a search.

The truth hurts, doesn't it? While some of it is a bit over-the-edge I'd say the majority of it is true. Of course, this is all subjective so your opinion is just as valid as mine. Mine just happens to be correct though ;)
 

etech

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
10,597
0
0
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: etech
If I were a child I might find that drivel amusing.

It's all been refuted before on this board. If you can't find the flaws in it yourself, do a search.

The truth hurts, doesn't it? While some of it is a bit over-the-edge I'd say the majority of it is true. Of course, this is all subjective so your opinion is just as valid as mine. Mine just happens to be correct though ;)


Truth?

You are kidding aren't you.
 

Flyermax2k3

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2003
3,204
0
0
Originally posted by: etech
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: etech
If I were a child I might find that drivel amusing.

It's all been refuted before on this board. If you can't find the flaws in it yourself, do a search.

The truth hurts, doesn't it? While some of it is a bit over-the-edge I'd say the majority of it is true. Of course, this is all subjective so your opinion is just as valid as mine. Mine just happens to be correct though ;)


Truth?

You are kidding aren't you.


No, I'm not kidding. That's my opinion and I'm stickin' to it. Did you read anything of my post after the first sentence?
 

Lucky

Lifer
Nov 26, 2000
13,126
1
0
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: etech
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: etech
If I were a child I might find that drivel amusing.

It's all been refuted before on this board. If you can't find the flaws in it yourself, do a search.

The truth hurts, doesn't it? While some of it is a bit over-the-edge I'd say the majority of it is true. Of course, this is all subjective so your opinion is just as valid as mine. Mine just happens to be correct though ;)


Truth?

You are kidding aren't you.


No, I'm not kidding. That's my opinion and I'm stickin' to it. Did you read anything of my post after the first sentence?


Doesnt matter what your opinion is, it's been refuted previously,on this board, POINT BY POINT with FACTS.

 

JellyBaby

Diamond Member
Apr 21, 2000
9,159
1
81
Points taken away for those of you who unnecessarily Quoted the original post in it's eye-shattering, lengthy entirety!
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Originally posted by: etech
If I were a child I might find that drivel amusing.

It's all been refuted before on this board. If you can't find the flaws in it yourself, do a search.
No, actually, it wasn't. You all piled on to the one significant distortion in the piece, the bit about $43 M to the Taliban. If memory serves, it was actually humanitarian aid to Afghanistan. It's technically true since the Taliban ran Afghanistan at the time, but it is deceptive.

By focusing on that one little snippet, you were all able to attack and attack while dodging the majority of points raised. Again.
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Originally posted by: etech
If I were a child I might find that drivel amusing.

It's all been refuted before on this board. If you can't find the flaws in it yourself, do a search.
No, actually, it wasn't. You all piled on to the one significant distortion in the piece, the bit about $43 M to the Taliban. If memory serves, it was actually humanitarian aid to Afghanistan. It's technically true since the Taliban ran Afghanistan at the time, but it is deceptive.

By focusing on that one little snippet, you were all able to attack and attack while dodging the majority of points raised. Again.
didnt they get money for stopping Opium production?

 

etech

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
10,597
0
0
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Originally posted by: etech
If I were a child I might find that drivel amusing.

It's all been refuted before on this board. If you can't find the flaws in it yourself, do a search.
No, actually, it wasn't. You all piled on to the one significant distortion in the piece, the bit about $43 M to the Taliban. If memory serves, it was actually humanitarian aid to Afghanistan. It's technically true since the Taliban ran Afghanistan at the time, but it is deceptive.

By focusing on that one little snippet, you were all able to attack and attack while dodging the majority of points raised. Again.

Do I need to go find Powell's announcement again where he said the aid would completely bypass the Taliban?

Someone took a lot of time to refute each of the incorrect points in that crap before. Each and every one was refuted. I don't see the need for me to waste my time to go over it again every time some newbie makes this "great find" and deems it worthy of reposting once again on this board.

Do a search if it's important to you.

 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
31,503
47,974
136
I love this atmosphere of "oh, the war's over, they didn't find anything!' among all the lefties.

Did I miss some annoncement? The one where Coallition forces said they've stopped looking and found nothing??
In other words, we know you're all excited to cry foul, but why don't you wait until something conclusive comes forth before trying to etch the future in stone? If you're so confident nothing will be found, then waiting to hear just that shouldn't be too hard. Or you can continue to sound like childish know-it-all asses who cite selective information to back up their agendas.



rolleye.gif
 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
81
Originally posted by: Orsorum
Originally posted by: Sternfan
Well I guess they sent it to you because you have the mind of a child, a retarded child but a child never the less.

I would be interested to see your point by point refutation.

Search button is your friend. It has been posted numerous times and it's points have been shredded. Only those with the mental capacity of a retard would believe this and think to either forward it in email form or post it on the Intarweb
 

DaiShan

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2001
9,617
1
0
Originally posted by: etech
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: etech
If I were a child I might find that drivel amusing.

It's all been refuted before on this board. If you can't find the flaws in it yourself, do a search.

The truth hurts, doesn't it? While some of it is a bit over-the-edge I'd say the majority of it is true. Of course, this is all subjective so your opinion is just as valid as mine. Mine just happens to be correct though ;)


Truth?

You are kidding aren't you.

Same diversionary tactics as usual etech. Always off issue with you, belittling those whose opinions you don't share.