• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

US Black AIDS rates rival African nations

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Perry404
The obvious difference is that in Africa there is very little education. In America pretty much everyone is educated.

Another is affordable and available condoms.

I suspect cultural differences can be a barrier, too. Some will sneer at that, as if it's a non-issue and Africa can easily be blamed for not immediately adopting our ways, but I'd ask those who say that to consider how far the 'condom culture' would have gotten in puritanical 1940's America, when sex ed was unacceptable. The very invention of the birth control pill in the US was met with wide disapproval as immoral for a while. To this day, our government forces 'abstinence only' onto our global aid.
 
The reason families in America are broken more today than ever before is because Crack and Meth have destroyed families like no previous generations. Until they stop treating crack like its 50x worse than coke and allow sudafed-equivalents over the counter without prescription these travesties will continue.

Its no secret that these drugs enhance one's sex drive and that drug addicted women freely give up unprotected sex in order to obtain them. Serious std's are running rampant in some circles, AIDS being just one of many. In this part of the country it is herpes. 1 in 4 people under the age of 25 have herpes of one form or another in the Midwest.
 
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Here's the thing, our politically correct culture has made even discussion of the behaviors that lead to this travesty an invitation for Joe/Jill/Twiraka/LaShawn to scream "That's racist" the moment any real analysis takes place.

Well, gee, maybe blacks should quit having unprotected high risk sex and using dirty needles to inject illegal drugs... Oh snap, that was culturally insensitive & racist...

Oh, you PC rebel you! Telling black people what they already tell themselves!

:roll:

PC is bad enough, we don't need you making it up where it doesn't exist.

We can't even use "black holes" in Dallas, don't know where the fuck you live.

What? They ban the Science Channel there? 😕

Text
 
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Here's the thing, our politically correct culture has made even discussion of the behaviors that lead to this travesty an invitation for Joe/Jill/Twiraka/LaShawn to scream "That's racist" the moment any real analysis takes place.

Well, gee, maybe blacks should quit having unprotected high risk sex and using dirty needles to inject illegal drugs... Oh snap, that was culturally insensitive & racist...

Oh, you PC rebel you! Telling black people what they already tell themselves!

:roll:

PC is bad enough, we don't need you making it up where it doesn't exist.

We can't even use "black holes" in Dallas, don't know where the fuck you live.

What? They ban the Science Channel there? 😕

Text

Poor man. He may keel over when he finds out that a black hole has no hair.
 
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: Butterbean
Originally posted by: XZeroII
A cure already exists, but it's being covered up. Want to know what it is?

STOP HAVING SEX WITH OTHER PEOPLE WITH AIDS!!!

People should stop having "anal" since it carries higher risk of transmission than normal sex.

Why hold back? Just come out and say what you really want to say.

He wants a govt camera in everyone's bedrooms to make sure no one ever slips it in the wrong hole.

i don't think you should be making a judgement for him on which the wrong one is...

you're just a "hole-ist"...
 


Originally posted by: m1ldslide1
Why would people who have darker skin choose to have a broken culture? Please explain why you feel people of darker skin make so many more poor choices than people of your skin color. I'd really like for someone to explain this.

Originally posted by: Double Trouble
How the heck would I know why people make dumb choices? It's certainly not an issue of race, since I simply don't believe any race makes better choices than another. It's a socio-economic and cultural problem. Neither of those can be changed by a government or any external force, those within the culture have to make the choices, nobody else can do that for them.

You're on the right track, but why is it a socio-economic and cultural problem for only one race in this country? Is it that people with darker skin are inherently more prone to such disadvantages, or to making more "stupid" decisions? Or is it maybe that there are factors beyond their control determining their socio-economic and cultural paradigm within which to make these decisions?

Or maybe race only exists in the media, and the black vs. white distinction is a fallacy - the statistics should actually be the very poor vs. everyone else? Maybe we're color-blind and don't know it. I've read some compelling arguments that suggest as much... that racism is essential a tool to keep the poor and uneducated pissed at each other so that they don't focus on who their real oppressors are (the rich).

Maybe it is class instead of race. Maybe it is genetics. Maybe its some combination. All I know is that I'm sick of people making generalizations without addressing the root causes, which is most of what I've heard in this thread.
 
it's the difference in the virulence of your stupidity...

dumb blacks (since i can't use an epithet) beget rap and gangsta shit and act out being pimps and thugs...

rednecks (since it's ok to use an epithet) beget jeff foxworthy shit and want to be comedians...

both are pretty scary in their own right, but one (you decide) destroys society a little faster than the other...
 
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Originally posted by: Kadarin
Originally posted by: XZeroII
A cure already exists, but it's being covered up. Want to know what it is?

STOP HAVING SEX WITH OTHER PEOPLE WITH AIDS!!!

If word ever got out that we already have a cure, wow, there would be chaos.

Your post is remarkably stupid, on a couple of levels.

I'm sorry, are you under the impression that AIDS will continue to run rampant if people stop having sex with other people with AIDS? Perhaps you can enlighten us all on how my post is remarkably stupid.

It's remarkably stupid because you apparently don't understand the difference between prevention and cure.

That's one level. You mentioned a couple of levels...


Ok, so let's fix what I said in order to satisfy your need to be 100% literal.

An erradication procedure already exists, but it's being covered up. Want to know what it is?

STOP HAVING SEX WITH OTHER PEOPLE WITH AIDS!!!

If word ever got out that we can rid ourselves of this disease, wow, there would be chaos.

I didn't mention a couple of levels, that was Kadarin, but he was right. Another level would be the fact that people who don't have Aids are generally unaware they are having sex with someone who does have Aids. So screaming at people to "STOP HAVING SEX WITH OTHER PEOPLE WITH AIDS" is fairly redundant advice.

Sorry, I didn't realize that it wasn't the same person.

Your point makes my point no less valid. Maybe you should find out more about the person that you're boinking before you do it. How hard is that?
 
Blacks are similar to other Blacks no matter where they currently reside. In other words, geography doesn't change your genes. This should be common knowledge.
 
Originally posted by: ultra laser
Blacks are similar to other Blacks no matter where they currently reside. In other words, geography doesn't change your genes. This should be common knowledge.

So what you're saying is that in the ancient 'Nature vs. Nurture' scientific debate, it should be 'common knowledge' that nature wins over all and nurture means nothing?

My God, give this man the Nobel Prize!!

:roll:


Look, if environment were everything, you could teach calculus to a horse. If genetics were everything, humans would be born already knowing calculus. Obviously, both aren't true. Therefore, both genes and geography play crucial roles in human development.

Your 'common knowledge' is ignorance.
 
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: ultra laser
Blacks are similar to other Blacks no matter where they currently reside. In other words, geography doesn't change your genes. This should be common knowledge.

So what you're saying is that in the ancient 'Nature vs. Nurture' scientific debate, it should be 'common knowledge' that nature wins over all and nurture means nothing?

My God, give this man the Nobel Prize!!

:roll:


Look, if environment were everything, you could teach calculus to a horse. If genetics were everything, humans would be born already knowing calculus. Obviously, both aren't true. Therefore, both genes and geography play crucial roles in human development.

Your 'common knowledge' is ignorance.

Nowadays the significance of nature is grossly understated, to the point where people are shocked to learn that Blacks in America are similar to Blacks in other countries.

Your calculus analogy is too stupid to comment on.
 
Originally posted by: ultra laser
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: ultra laser
Blacks are similar to other Blacks no matter where they currently reside. In other words, geography doesn't change your genes. This should be common knowledge.

So what you're saying is that in the ancient 'Nature vs. Nurture' scientific debate, it should be 'common knowledge' that nature wins over all and nurture means nothing?

My God, give this man the Nobel Prize!!

:roll:


Look, if environment were everything, you could teach calculus to a horse. If genetics were everything, humans would be born already knowing calculus. Obviously, both aren't true. Therefore, both genes and geography play crucial roles in human development.

Your 'common knowledge' is ignorance.

Nowadays the significance of nature is grossly understated, to the point where people are shocked to learn that Blacks in America are similar to Blacks in other countries.

Your calculus analogy is too stupid to comment on.

Because you say so?

Would you also say that Whites in America are similar to White in other countries? Or is it just that humans in America are similar to humans in other countries, and you're just being selective here?

That calculus analogy is not mine BTW, but Robert Heinlein's.
 
Originally posted by: BarneyFife
Blacks will screw anything that moves. Always funny to see a black guy with a big fat white woman haha

"The closer a secret is kept, the more powerful the impact once it is finally revealed. Such is the case with author and activist J.L. King's intriguing look at the lives and lifestyles of black men who sleep with other men but do not consider themselves to be gay. These men live "on the down low," the "DL" for short, and their sexual activities have gained significant notice as the rate of HIV/AIDS infection in black women has skyrocketed, with the vast majority of cases coming from heterosexual sex."

http://www.amazon.com/Down-Low...&qid=1217787096&sr=8-1
 
Originally posted by: BarneyFife
Blacks will screw anything that moves. Always funny to see a black guy with a big fat white woman haha

So how do you explain George Washington Carver? Supposedly he died a virgin.

Anyway, believe it or not, fat women are considered to be more attractive in many cultures.
 
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: ultra laser
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: ultra laser
Blacks are similar to other Blacks no matter where they currently reside. In other words, geography doesn't change your genes. This should be common knowledge.

So what you're saying is that in the ancient 'Nature vs. Nurture' scientific debate, it should be 'common knowledge' that nature wins over all and nurture means nothing?

My God, give this man the Nobel Prize!!

:roll:


Look, if environment were everything, you could teach calculus to a horse. If genetics were everything, humans would be born already knowing calculus. Obviously, both aren't true. Therefore, both genes and geography play crucial roles in human development.

Your 'common knowledge' is ignorance.

Nowadays the significance of nature is grossly understated, to the point where people are shocked to learn that Blacks in America are similar to Blacks in other countries.

Your calculus analogy is too stupid to comment on.

Because you say so?

Would you also say that Whites in America are similar to White in other countries? Or is it just that humans in America are similar to humans in other countries, and you're just being selective here?

That calculus analogy is not mine BTW, but Robert Heinlein's.
Yes, the fact that you're able to identify them as Whites proves this. If they were merely humans, they would be indistinguishable from other humans, and as such the notion of Whiteness would have no meaning.
 
Originally posted by: ultra laser
Yes, the fact that you're able to identify them as Whites proves this. If they were merely humans, they would be indistinguishable from other humans, and as such the notion of Whiteness would have no meaning.

😕
 
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: m1ldslide1
-snip-
Not to mention our disgusting lack of real sex ed in public schools - obviously abstinence only 'education' leads us nowhere. You can thank the fundies and conservatives for that one.

Do black people/African Americans have different sex ed classes?

If not, that can't be blamed or all students would have a similar rate.

Fern

Your conclusion is nonsense.

The rate of IV drug use in the black population is much higher than in the general population (and you DO know that the IV drug use spreads AIDS more effeciently than any other activity, don't you?) Also, the incarceration rate of black males is much higher than for the general population (you DO know, don't you, that prisons - with their widespread consensual and non-consensual homosexual activity and widespread drug use - are a prime breeding ground for HIV?). When you combine those two factors, the rate of HIV in the black population is much higher than in the general population. Thus, sex in the black population is a much riskier proposition than in the white population, and increases the black HIV rate even more as compared with the white population.

So explain again why black students receiving the same sex ed would have similar rates of HIV?
 
Originally posted by: Don Vito Corleone
I must say I find these numbers surprising.

Even accepting that black people are disproportionately likely to live in poverty (which in this country is indisputably the case), how do we account for these dramatic AIDS/HIV numbers? Why don't we see similar numbers among other ethnicities that tend to be poor, like Hispanic immigrants? I don't think black people are statistically likelier than other races to take intravenous drugs or engage in gay sex, so what is this about?

Hispanics have more cohesive families and thus greater fear of shame -compounded by pervasive organized faith. Also, by nature of being immigrants they demonstrate discontent with their position and an eagerness to overcome it. So, looking forward to a better future positively influences self-preserving behavior, as opposed to wallowing in despair and expecting to die young anyway, regardless of one's actions.
 
Originally posted by: Auric

Hispanics have more cohesive families and thus greater fear of shame -compounded by pervasive organized faith. Also, by nature of being immigrants they demonstrate discontent with their position and an eagerness to overcome it. So, looking forward to a better future positively influences self-preserving behavior, as opposed to wallowing in despair and expecting to die young anyway, regardless of one's actions.

Auric, that was one of the most insightful posts about Hispanic culture I've ever read on these forums.

 
Originally posted by: BarneyFife
Blacks will screw anything that moves. Always funny to see a black guy with a big fat white woman haha

It takes a lot to stand out for idiocy with the competition around here. Congrats.
 
Back
Top