- Aug 25, 2001
- 56,587
- 10,225
- 126
I agree.My view is that it's better to keep old PC, wait for more funds, then update to something that will be more substantial upgrade.
Having experienced the upgrade-often bug, I have often spent "small money" on upgrades, but have done it so often, that I might very well have been better served by waiting, on some bigger, longer-term upgrades, that would have been a lot more substantial. (I know some of you have been trying to tell me this.)
With the introduction of the desktop Ryzen CPUs, my perspective changed. Though the initial price was higher, I saw unmistakable value, that I had never seen with Intel's higher-end products. Therefore, I put my money where my mouth is, and now all of my bigger desktop PCs are Ryzen rigs.
Which, itself, may have been premature, with the soon-to-be-introduced ThreadRipper CPU lineup.
I see the Ryzen 5 1600 CPUs, as pretty-much the most entry-level CPUs than anyone should buy.
Dual-cores are dead. R.I.P.
My friend, though, seems to think he only needs / wants a dual-core, so he doesn't want to buy any higher on the product stack than that.
