Originally posted by: Scribe
Reading the reviews here:
http://techreport.com/reviews/...gts-320mb/index.x?pg=6
It shows that the X1900 XT (256 MB) is running at almost half the frames of the 8800GTS. Granted I know it's 256 vs the 512 I have, but as I've seen in the past, that the extra memory doesn't make a huge difference.
Any other opinions are appreciated.... U3 is one I'm waiting for, not Crysis so much, but DEFINITELY Enemy Territory: Quake Wars...
Thanks again!
Have you played the ET:QW beta? If you haven't, you should know that it's probably not worth waiting for (unless it is improved big time, the game sucks IMO.) Anyway, it should have no trouble on an X1900XT...it's not too demanding (graphics, at least on that beta map, really, really suck.)
The 8800GTS is going to be a good upgrade from the X1900XT, even the 512MB version (memory on the X1900's does make a rather large difference, depending on the game), but I can't see upgrading to an 8800 at this point. You might as well wait for the future cards from AMD and nVidia. From what we've seen, the 8800's aren't really powerful enough for DX10... I think it's going to be best to wait.
I upgraded from an X1900XT 512MB to an 8800GTS, but that was back in January when I could still get $230 for my X1900XT, and the 8800's were new. Right now I just don't think it's a good idea... the 8800's are geting close to a year old and better things are just around the corner. Also, prices on the 8800GTS cards are not too appealing for a 8-month old card. I paid $370 AR for mine in January, the going price for one now is something like $350.