Arkaign
Lifer
- Oct 27, 2006
- 20,736
- 1,379
- 126
I only use chrome,and when i was using that system my resolution was at 1280x1024 and yeah chrome did bog the cpu down,when youtube would stutter,cpu usage was damn near 100% until i dropped it to 360p then it was buttery smooth.
Netflix and hulu ran good then again cause i have the worlds worst dsl isp provider,i tend to run low quality just not to buffer let alone not lag which ended up not being a issue there.
Aero i have always left off,set windows to run for best performance over letting it decide so maybe your right.
Tower isn't something i could really wanna use myself even if it did handle hd,its something i was stuck with using for a bit till i got my core i5 back up.:biggrin:
Understandable
I refurb so many old boxes for a local charity that I've really gotten used to squeezing the max performance/usability that I can possibly achieve out of them in order for them not to simply become landfill material. A lot of the tweaks seem unintuitive coming from high-end systems.
For example :
*- Aero actually enables you to offload more of the display rendering to the GPU rather than the CPU.
*- 32-Bit OS vs. 64-Bit OS actually reduces system overhead by a marginal but very real number (slightly lower ram usage as well).
*- Chrome is an outstanding browser, but is actually fairly CPU-intensive in OOB state. There are various guides on how to make it smoother on low end systems, but the easiest solution is just to deal with IE for low-end PC duties. There are better options for more experienced users, but as I'm dealing with utter novices, I find that IE serves as a 'good enough' browser.