• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Update3: Finally found one! *** Updated Rant: Stop wasting my time! *** Rant - Buying a house is impossible!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: slag
Originally posted by: Skoorb
In Cali people make more, so it's not entirely applicable comparing.

Anyway a 200k house you can buy with no money down and a yearly income of around $40-50k if you really want to.

AMEN. All you east and west coast people who brag/whine about the price of housing dont take into account that you get PAID MORE to work out there. Hypothetically, if I were to be making 40k in kansas or nebraska, that would translate to 60k or more on the coast.

so in other words, big woop.

That's nice but you're still missing part of the problem. The housing costs and salary differences aren't directly proportinate. Getting PAID 20% MORE is nice, but if the houses cost 50% more, you're still fuct. Just shy of six figure household income and a decent house we can afford is hard to find. It's condo or house-poor.
 
Originally posted by: CChaos
Originally posted by: slag
Originally posted by: Skoorb
In Cali people make more, so it's not entirely applicable comparing.

Anyway a 200k house you can buy with no money down and a yearly income of around $40-50k if you really want to.

AMEN. All you east and west coast people who brag/whine about the price of housing dont take into account that you get PAID MORE to work out there. Hypothetically, if I were to be making 40k in kansas or nebraska, that would translate to 60k or more on the coast.

so in other words, big woop.

That's nice but you're still missing part of the problem. The housing costs and salary differences aren't directly proportinate. Getting PAID 20% MORE is nice, but if the houses cost 50% more, you're still fuct. Just shy of six figure household income and a decent house we can afford is hard to find. It's condo or house-poor.


Amen. Another factor to consider is WHAT you're getting for the price as well. You'd be lucky if you got a condo for 400K in a surburb much less in LA or SF.
 
Originally posted by: CChaos
Originally posted by: slag
Originally posted by: Skoorb
In Cali people make more, so it's not entirely applicable comparing.

Anyway a 200k house you can buy with no money down and a yearly income of around $40-50k if you really want to.

AMEN. All you east and west coast people who brag/whine about the price of housing dont take into account that you get PAID MORE to work out there. Hypothetically, if I were to be making 40k in kansas or nebraska, that would translate to 60k or more on the coast.

so in other words, big woop.

That's nice but you're still missing part of the problem. The housing costs and salary differences aren't directly proportinate. Getting PAID 20% MORE is nice, but if the houses cost 50% more, you're still fuct. Just shy of six figure household income and a decent house we can afford is hard to find. It's condo or house-poor.
That's nice, but you too are missing part of the problem. Currently I spend a touch more than 20% of my take home on my mortgage payments. If my income was to increase by about 20% I could, in this manner, afford a house worth twice as much 🙂 So, income doesn't need to double to afford a house for twice as much, unless you spend all of your money on it.
 
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Currently I spend a touch more than 20% of my take home on my mortgage payments. If my income was to increase by about 20% I could, in this manner, afford a house worth twice as much 🙂 So, income doesn't need to double to afford a house for twice as much, unless you spend all of your money on it.
You've got me confused.

If I was making $50k and I put 20% towards the house, that would be around $833/month. If I got a 20% raise, I'd be making $60k, which would leave me 20% more to put towards the house. $1000/month. That won't get you a house that costs twice as much....
 
Sorry I was tempted to agree with Skoorb, but I really shouldn't. A $186,500 house at 5% for 30 years will cost you $1000/month. Assume that's 20% of your income. So you take home $5000/month. Get a 20% raise to $6000/month and spend 20% on your mortgage. Now you've got $1200/month going to a mortgage. Suddenly you're buying a $373,000 house? Nope, you'll get about 20% more house.
 
CChao/Jzeros - Ooh, this threads a few day's old but I believe you guys are misinterpreting Skoorbie's logic a bit. Look at it a little differently. If you take home 5000, and 1000 is going towards mortgage, that means $4000 is going elsewhere. If he makes $6000 a month, he maintains the $4000 in "other" expenses (or savings) effectively giving him $2000 to spend on a mortgage. Am I right Skoorb?
 
Urban renewal is done by people with money. So don't expect to be able to fit into that group.

You can't afford it, look at other areas.
 
I was shopping for a townhouse last year, the price sky rocketed. The one I bought at list price 325k was appraised at 185k a year before. And you have to fight for it. I had a smart agent, that's why I got it without bidding.
 
In the town where I work. the average price of a home is around $500,000. I would have to live at least a hour away before I could find a house I could afford.
 
Move to Northern NJ and you'll see how much more difficult it is to buy a house.

My friends would offer more than the asking price and still get outbid.

My old boss just sold his place and the first person to make a bid offered 15% over what he was asking no questions asked.

Its insane up here. My place has appreciated over 30% in the last year alone.
 
how do people earning 50-80k afford houses 250k+?
does all the income go towards the mortage? no investing/savings?
 
Originally posted by: da loser
how do people earning 50-80k afford houses 250k+?
does all the income go towards the mortage? no investing/savings?


Both parents usually work. Say the husband makes $60,000(+) a year while the wife makes $40,000-50,000 a year. Combined that's $100,000(+). Not bad as a couple could easily afford a $350,000 house. IMO though people are geting themselves in some major debt. I know a young couple that just recently purchased a $350,000 Mc Mansion. I can't remember exactly what the payments are but it's outrageous. I believe their paying between $2,000-3000 a month @6% for 30 years. 30 years is an awefully long time. What happens if he loses his job or if the wife wants to have children and stop working? They would be in a world of hurt.

In Cali people make more, so it's not entirely applicable comparing.
Really? I doubt it. Police officers and public school teachers in some North Jersey districts make close to $100,000 North Jersey is very expensive. I live in South Jersey and it's still reasonable. Houses tend to go for $180,000 and up in most areas.
 
Originally posted by: Jzero
Basically, there are two types of properties where I want to live. The town is a place that 25-30 years ago, you would not dream of going there after dark. An old steel town that became depressed as the coal/iron/coke industries slowed down.

Today, it is an urban renewal success story that warms the heart when you read its history. But along with this success story comes burgeoning property values, which has resulted in this situation.

There are new and refurbed homes that sell for upwards of $200k.
And there are older, unrefurbed homes that go from $180k down to about $80k depending on whether they are dilapadated, or just plain out-of-date.

The market here is hot. Houses generally sell within 2-3 days of being listed, usually at asking price, sometimes significantly above asking price.

The result of this condition seems to make it impossible for a middle-class person (me) to actually buy property. The new/refurbed homes are too expensive. But the "fixer-uppers" are cheap enough that investment groups swoop in with cash offers and snap them up. Most people will take a cash offer over the financed offer since you don't have to worry about things like the financing falling through or the home failing the inspection (since the investor is going to rehab the joint, he likely will waive inspection).

I can't afford the $200k + for a new/refurbed house.
But I don't have $170k in cash to plunk down on an older fixer-upper.

So pretty much, I cannot live in this town.

It's just whacky to me. The way we buy and sell houses is completely loony.

multiply all your figures by 5 and there's have the same situation in my neighborhood. we have 50 year old tract houses selling for a cool million dollars. (but it has a pool and a remodeled kitchen! it must be worth it!)
 
man, the house price just keeps going up.

I bought my house last June for 325K. It's a beautiful end unit townhouse.

Last Nov, a similar house in my neighbor went for 335K, now a new one was sold and it's going for 350K. OMG, how much more expensive are houses going to get? The mortgage rate is going back up already.
 
New rant:
We looked at a place on Saturday. Called today to put in an offer and it's been under contract for 4 days.
4 days ago was SATURDAY! They allowed us to look at the home even though they had already accepted an offer. What gives?

I am seriously considering taking the next seller who wastes my time to small claims court for nominal damages, just to "get them back." I don't mind being outbid (as in the rant below) but we had another place we put an offer on and basically the seller is just "price checking." They rejected our offer because they didn't actually have any intention of selling the house! That's ridiculous. We wasted an hour looking at the house and another hour on the paperwork to find out they just want to see what kind of offers they'd get???
 
That's why you should never stop looking even if you find something you like.

It could fall through and as a buyer you can back out under most circumstances (ie. say getting rejected for a mortgage).
 
Originally posted by: Jzero
New rant:
We looked at a place on Saturday. Called today to put in an offer and it's been under contract for 4 days.
4 days ago was SATURDAY! They allowed us to look at the home even though they had already accepted an offer. What gives?

I am seriously considering taking the next seller who wastes my time to small claims court for nominal damages, just to "get them back." I don't mind being outbid (as in the rant below) but we had another place we put an offer on and basically the seller is just "price checking." They rejected our offer because they didn't actually have any intention of selling the house! That's ridiculous. We wasted an hour looking at the house and another hour on the paperwork to find out they just want to see what kind of offers they'd get???
Yea, bring them to court, EXCELLENT use of resources.
 
I'm in the same situation...looking to buy a house on a $42K income. Houses around here (CA) are around $280K+ for a 10yr old house. Now I just gotta wait for the wifey to graduate and get a job
 
Jzero I wish you the best of luck, man! Fortunately it's not such a hot market where I live that a house is grabbed in a matter of days but it did take some months to find the one I wanted last Feb. Being a first time homeowner is the best feeling in the world. I hope you find what you're looking for and soon!
 
Originally posted by: SampSon
Originally posted by: Jzero
New rant:
We looked at a place on Saturday. Called today to put in an offer and it's been under contract for 4 days.
4 days ago was SATURDAY! They allowed us to look at the home even though they had already accepted an offer. What gives?

I am seriously considering taking the next seller who wastes my time to small claims court for nominal damages, just to "get them back." I don't mind being outbid (as in the rant below) but we had another place we put an offer on and basically the seller is just "price checking." They rejected our offer because they didn't actually have any intention of selling the house! That's ridiculous. We wasted an hour looking at the house and another hour on the paperwork to find out they just want to see what kind of offers they'd get???
Yea, bring them to court, EXCELLENT use of resources.

Time is money. My real estate agent is a single mother and has two kids to feed. Every hour that some fool wastes of her time is an hour that could have been spent working a potential ACTUAL sale. It's one thing for a sale to fall through, but it's a completely different when the selling agent has ACCEPTED an offer yet continues to allow people to see the house. We're not talking about a pending offer that could still be rejected, we're talking about a signed contract. That's just plain negligent, and it's hardly frivolous to seek compensation for that kind of nonsense, IMO. And this says nothing to the value of my time and resources wasted.
 
A new update!

Well, it's been almost a year, but we finally found one. We basically got a lucky condition where the seller didn't want to have any showings until 6/28 but we managed to convince him to show it to us on 6/25. He went away for the weekend so we were the only ones to see it all weekend. We got on offer on the table before anyone else could try to horn in and they took it, AND for less than the asking price (which is how it's SUPPOSED to work, dagnabbit).

It's a good price, good school district, low taxes, nice quiet neighborhood, and a pretty nice little place. Still have the home inspection to monkey things up, but otherwise it's a done deal.

BTW, the house in the original rant below sold for $6000 LESS than we offered. The seller took a lower offer on the off-chance that either our financing would fall through or the inspection went badly. Either she's an idiot, or there is more wrong with that house than we guessed. Obviously the developer that bought it waived inspection. He gutted it, btw. It will either be rented or resold by the end of the year, I bet.
 
Originally posted by: Jzero
A new update!

Well, it's been almost a year, but we finally found one. We basically got a lucky condition where the seller didn't want to have any showings until 6/28 but we managed to convince him to show it to us on 6/25. He went away for the weekend so we were the only ones to see it all weekend. We got on offer on the table before anyone else could try to horn in and they took it, AND for less than the asking price (which is how it's SUPPOSED to work, dagnabbit).

It's a good price, good school district, low taxes, nice quiet neighborhood, and a pretty nice little place. Still have the home inspection to monkey things up, but otherwise it's a done deal.

BTW, the house in the original rant below sold for $6000 LESS than we offered. The seller took a lower offer on the off-chance that either our financing would fall through or the inspection went badly. Either she's an idiot, or there is more wrong with that house than we guessed. Obviously the developer that bought it waived inspection. He gutted it, btw. It will either be rented or resold by the end of the year, I bet.

You know as soon as you buy it is going to turn into a buyers market 😛

Good luck with house and we will see in a few years if you have a different opinion about the evil sellers once you are one. 🙂
 
Back
Top