• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

UPDATE: Stephen Colbert to host The Late Show. Five year contract.

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

GagHalfrunt

Lifer
Apr 19, 2001
25,284
1,998
126
Replacing Letterman shouldn't be that hard. He wasn't very funny and wasn't a great interviewer either.

On the contrary, Letterman was a decent interviewer of celebs who didn't want to be interviewed. He was no great shakes when it was somebody pitching a movie or whatever, but when there was blood in the water and the guest had something to hide he knew which buttons to press. That's what set him apart from Leno, Jay would never go for the jugular with guests like Lindsay or Paris. Dave did.
 

Imp

Lifer
Feb 8, 2000
18,828
184
106
Good lord no. D: Her show is painfully unfunny.

I find her material more offensive or done for shock value than funny.

On the contrary, Letterman was a decent interviewer of celebs who didn't want to be interviewed. He was no great shakes when it was somebody pitching a movie or whatever, but when there was blood in the water and the guest had something to hide he knew which buttons to press. That's what set him apart from Leno, Jay would never go for the jugular with guests like Lindsay or Paris. Dave did.

Letterman's a good interviewer. He does kiss ass, but he does poke and prod when "necessary". Not a great fan of his monologue, Top Ten List, or some of his pre-interview sketches.

Best pre-interview material is Conan who's a nice guy, which makes his interviews less exciting.
 

blankslate

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2008
8,797
572
126
Y'all realize that Sonikku posts sarcastically and is essentially the Colbert of these forums, right? Because it kind of seems like you're all falling for his shtick here, which is only mildly ironic given the subject at hand.

Truth, Sonikku is very good at it. People have replied to Sonikku's posts fairly often while missing entirely the :colbert:.

Anyway my concern is that Stephen Colbert would have to tone down a lot of what makes his Colbert show funny
(if you like satire) to appeal to a more mainstream audience.

However, his interview style is probably as good as David Letterman's is if a little different.

People watch The Daily Show and the Colbert Report because they skewer idiocy in public policy, world events and the media.

Late night shows like the tonight show, Late Night aren't really very places were you're free to be too far outside the mainstream. And the typical audience for those shows I suspect skew older and more conservative than the audiences for the 11 p.m. comedy central line up.

As for another suggestion why not Chris Rock? He's still funny imo and while he's an untested interviewer it might be a risk worth taking for NBC.

I do think that Stephen Colbert would make a good choice but I also think that his absence from 11:30 pm on Comedy Central would leave a giant hole in the lineup that would be even harder to replace than David Letterman's spot in late night t.v.




.....
 
Last edited:

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,864
31,359
146
I've heard Tina Fey and Amy Poehler mentioned. I'd like to see either one of them over Colbert. I've never seen Colbert when he wasn't playing a character, he'd need to be himself and maybe himself isn't all that good.

Oh that's a good thought. Either would be good, I think, and no one ever considers female hosts.

I think the show would be a terrible fit for Colbert.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,864
31,359
146
Oh shit, no one suggested Louis C.K? I heard he already tested for it....

:D
 

DougK62

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2001
8,035
6
81
I will miss Letterman and his dry sense of humor. He is also easily the best of the late nighters at interviewing. Whenever a celebrity is having a rough time in the news they ALWAYS go on Letterman. He has a great way of humanizing people, letting them tell their story, and even manages to keep it funny and light-hearted.

Colbert is too edgy for the spot (love his show). Jon Stewart doesn't have the talent to be broadly appealing. Tina Fey could be a dynamite fit.
 

88keys

Golden Member
Aug 24, 2012
1,854
12
81
As much as I like Colbert; I'd have to say that he'd be a bad choice for a late show host unless he can radically shift his style away from dry satire which is not for everybody.

However, I think Jon Stewart could pull it off and would most likely kick Fallon's ass in the ratings.


FWIW, I would like to see Norm MacDonald or Kevin Nealon take crack at the job.
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,080
5,452
136
They should have a weekly lottery, like the power ball.
New host every week.
Anyone can apply.
Just takes a little luck.

"Tonights host is Rick from Minneapolis Minnesota."
Oh, they get to pick their own guests too.

Taking reality TV to a new level.

You may want to make an intellectual property patent on that idea before some network grabs it. Compared to the rest of the reality shit that's on tv, this is pure genius.
 

TheSlamma

Diamond Member
Sep 6, 2005
7,625
5
81
I hope not, Colbert's show is the best comedy show out right now. I mean would he do it in character? or become some lame stiff trying to be a funny we haven't seen him do


Let Tina Fey do it, then it'll be good on mute.
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,901
4,927
136
Pretend what ? You've just proved my point on another thread English speakers not getting the meaning of sarcasm.

Colbert being a Conservative was sarcasm from the start, it's what the whole show is based on.

Not sure where pretending comes into it, but yeah that is one of the basics of sarcasm more or less.

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2376944&page=3

He was clearly a liberal hack. That much was obvious.

I don't think you could understand sarcasm if it got up and bit you anyway.
 

Skyclad1uhm1

Lifer
Aug 10, 2001
11,383
87
91
On the contrary, Letterman was a decent interviewer of celebs who didn't want to be interviewed. He was no great shakes when it was somebody pitching a movie or whatever, but when there was blood in the water and the guest had something to hide he knew which buttons to press. That's what set him apart from Leno, Jay would never go for the jugular with guests like Lindsay or Paris. Dave did.

I'm not too fond of interviewers who want to be the centre of attention all the time, and he regularly had that tendency. Especially with comedians, he seemed to hate anyone being funnier than him, which meant 90% of the guests. The way Letterman would repeat crappy jokes if no one would laugh just in the hope that someone would laugh the second time also annoyed me. It was bad, it failed, so it won't be any better the second time around. Deal with it or replace your writers.
 

DigDog

Lifer
Jun 3, 2011
14,652
3,011
136
On the contrary, Letterman was a decent interviewer of celebs who didn't want to be interviewed. He was no great shakes when it was somebody pitching a movie or whatever, but when there was blood in the water and the guest had something to hide he knew which buttons to press. That's what set him apart from Leno, Jay would never go for the jugular with guests like Lindsay or Paris. Dave did.
this is the dave letterman from 15 years ago we're talking of, right?