Does anyone else find this disturbing? How can two brain surgeons have such differing opinions? Experience? People often joke that economists have differing opinions but brain surgery is supposed to be far more concrete since it's in the realm of hard science.
It's called "practicing" medicine for a reason...every surgeon has a differing level of experience, some may know about newer procedures than others, some may just be more willing to try something others don't have the cajones to do, sometimes in extreme situations the risk is worth itDoes anyone else find this disturbing? How can two brain surgeons have such differing opinions? Experience? People often joke that economists have differing opinions but brain surgery is supposed to be far more concrete since it's in the realm of hard science.
It's called "practicing" medicine for a reason...every surgeon has a differing level of experience, some may know about newer procedures than others, some may just be more willing to try something others don't have the cajones to do, sometimes in extreme situations the risk is worth it
Does anyone else find this disturbing? How can two brain surgeons have such differing opinions? Experience? People often joke that economists have differing opinions but brain surgery is supposed to be far more concrete since it's in the realm of hard science.
Not at all surprising to me. Brain surgery is interpreting grainy 3D images and imagining exactly what they mean. My cousin began violently throwing up and eventually ended up in the ER. Three brain surgeons later he was told that he had an inoperable tumor and had only a couple weeks to live, yet after a couple weeks he suddenly stopped having convulsions. A week later he went home. ALL his doctors agreed that he had only a couple weeks to live, yet he lived maybe five more years without any symptoms. Then one day he just dropped dead, no convulsions or anything, as inexplicable as his recovery. Also had a friend who had an inoperable brain tumor the size of a softball, diagnosed as a parasitic twin which after almost twenty years had begun to grow. She was given only weeks to live, yet when I met her she had been under the death sentence for eight years. She did have some symptoms - pupils different sizes and sometimes passing out when the tumor shifted on what it pressed - but had abandoned all her medication when near death and had treated it for near a decade with nothing more than weed. For all I know she's still alive thirty-odd years later, she got married and moved to the west coast.Does anyone else find this disturbing? How can two brain surgeons have such differing opinions? Experience? People often joke that economists have differing opinions but brain surgery is supposed to be far more concrete since it's in the realm of hard science.
Q: What do you call the person who graduated at the bottom of their med school class?
A: Doctor.