• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

UPDATE--I MADE THIS IN A FEW MIN...IM VENTING--I ADDED A NEW PIC!!!!

sorry about the bad quality...if you read closely you can figure it out.

if not i have the text

Halabja (pop. 80,000) is a small Kurdish city in northern Iraq. On Wednesday, the Star reminded readers that Saddam Hussein's Iraqi army killed 5,000 Kurds in a 1988 chemical weapons attack on Halabja near the end of a bloody, eight-year war with Iran.

these 500 pound bombs, filled with chemical warfare agent, were discovered at muthanna
 
How about you show pictures of the American soldiers who were affected from the gas attacks?




Oh that's right, that is something we as American citizens do not see.
 
Originally posted by: minendo
How about you show pictures of the American soldiers who were affected from the gas attacks?




Oh that's right, that is something we as American citizens do not see.
Click to expand...

trusty minendo, i can always rely on you for a good flame
 
Originally posted by: halik
guess who supported iraq with the military equipment for that war
Click to expand...

we supplied that gas eh???

so you think that we should just let this treatment of civilians slide??
 
Originally posted by: nick1985
flame me if you want, but i am sick of anti-war protests. someone needs to change what is going on in iraq.

what i made, flame if you want...
Click to expand...

Nice try. But the CIA says it was Iran that did the above. It was during the Iran/Iraq war and the Kurds were caught in the crossfire. Who really gassed them, who knows, could have been either side. Wait until the war with Iraq is over, I'm sure you're government will then say it was the Iranians and you'll all forget that they were claiming it was Iraq. Welcome to 1984.

 
Originally posted by: nick1985
Originally posted by: minendo
Originally posted by: nick1985
trusty minendo, i can always rely on you for a good flame
Click to expand...
That post was far from flammatory. It is reality.
Click to expand...

oh i know its true, just you always are mean to me
Click to expand...

minendo's a well respected member of this community, his posts are hardly mean to you AFAIK.
 
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: nick1985
Originally posted by: halik
guess who supported iraq with the military equipment for that war
Click to expand...

we supplied that gas eh???

so you think that we should just let this treatment of civilians slide??
Click to expand...



http://rawa.false.net/s-photos.htm

I hope you don't honestly believe that we only hit bad guys.
Click to expand...


Don't you know we got smart bombs, it's a good thing
that our bombs are clever.
Don't you know that the smart bombs are so clever,
they only kill bad people.


DElfman 1994
 
Yep. When we go to war with Iraq will will hit the innocent. The difference is we are not AIMING at them like Saddam
 
Originally posted by: hagbard
Originally posted by: nick1985
flame me if you want, but i am sick of anti-war protests. someone needs to change what is going on in iraq.

what i made, flame if you want...
Click to expand...

Nice try. But the CIA says it was Iran that did the above. It was during the Iran/Iraq war and the Kurds were caught in the crossfire. Who really gassed them, who knows, could have been either side. Wait until the war with Iraq is over, I'm sure you're government will then say it was the Iranians and you'll all forget that they were claiming it was Iraq. Welcome to 1984.
Click to expand...
Soooooo, let's say that it's a fact that there's a mass grave being filled with the bodies of civilians who have publicly voiced disagreement with the current regime in Iraq. I don't have a picture of it, but I want to show everyone else that it's one thing to read and argue about it from the comfort and ignorance of our keyboards - another thing entirely to see what the atrocity looks like, put the general on the front line - so to speak.

But since I don't have an actual picture - I use one that was taken of a similar situation, but a different time and perhaps different war. Then someone who spends more time in the past than the present recognizes the picture as being from elsewhere and eschews their own brand of propoganda to discredit the validity of the reason the picture was posted in the first place.

Well, Welcome to 2003 - where that sh!t is still going on, even if you don't have a nice hi-res glossy to vomit over.

:disgust:
 
Originally posted by: althor27
Yep. When we go to war with Iraq will will hit the innocent. The difference is we are not AIMING at them like Saddam
Click to expand...
Please don't confuse them with facts. It is so much fun reading their immature/unenlightened propaganda.

 

Please don't pretend we are prepared to invade Iraq over our concerns for the Iraqi people!

The United States has been perfectly willing to stand by while people have been slaughtered under much more dire circumstances (particularly in Africa). And there's nothing new about these atrocities committed by Saddam; most of these incidents came to light more than a decade ago.

No, there's something else driving us now. It has to be 9/11; it has to be either a response to the vulerability we now feel, or just a need to strike back at someone (and why not Saddam?).

 
Originally posted by: PowerEngineer
Please don't pretend we are prepared to invade Iraq over our concerns for the Iraqi people!

The United States has been perfectly willing to stand by while people have been slaughtered under much more dire circumstances (particularly in Africa). And there's nothing new about these atrocities committed by Saddam; most of these incidents came to light more than a decade ago.

No, there's something else driving us now. It has to be 9/11; it has to be either a response to the vulerability we now feel, or just a need to strike back at someone (and why not Saddam?).
Click to expand...
Eh, Please don't pretend your argument is based only on a reference to 9/11 and the mobilization of 300,000+ troops because of a bit of insecurity...

 
i think it's time for a righteous butt kicking. Grab your sword and head to iraq to plant your foot firmly in the behind of evil! better grab boo to fill in the details 😉
 
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Originally posted by: althor27
Yep. When we go to war with Iraq will will hit the innocent. The difference is we are not AIMING at them like Saddam
Click to expand...
Please don't confuse them with facts. It is so much fun reading their immature/unenlightened propaganda.
Click to expand...

Well at least there are 2 people in this thread that I agree with.

EDIT: Well 3 counting Nick.
 
Originally posted by: Walleye
i think it's time for a righteous butt kicking. Grab your sword and head to iraq to plant your foot firmly in the behind of evil! better grab boo to fill in the details 😉
Click to expand...

im sharpening my claymore as we speak....😉
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top