Turin39789
Lifer
Cmax? gives you choice of sliding doors or not.
Downside:not available yet.
Downside:not available yet.
You sure? Every wife I've ever known is going to be driving that Flex OR in very short order making an appeal to upgrade the Malibu. I guess what I'm saying is I have never known a healthy married couple in which the man was not driving the older vehicle. I know you said your commute is shorter but that's how it is.It's actually going to be me. I've got half the commute as her now and she'll start driving the old beater malibu that was hers previously. It gets 30 on the highway which is an improvement over the 20 she's seeing right now.
The one thing I don't like about the Flex is that it lacks sliding doors. Kids are entirely too careless about swinging doors open into other cars, sliding doors make it really difficult to door check the car in the next parking space.
Cmax? gives you choice of sliding doors or not.
Downside:not available yet.
I had a Mazda5 while ago, and loved it. I'd go with that over the C-Max if I had to choose. While I'd still consider a Mz5 again, I want something a little bigger and able to haul/tow more than the Mazda did. Plus I want a little more room up front. The Mazda worked, but it was a bit tight. And the 3rd row was more there for show than anything useful.
The complaint I have about the fullsize "mini"vans is that you can't get the higher end options without also paying for the power doors. I haven't seen a power door that I liked. They always seem slow to open/close and almost every one has a number of comments from buyers about having to get them repaired at least once or twice.
That's one thing I loved about the Mazda5. Those doors were light and slid open/close with the flick of your hand.
Minivans are just soooooo ugly. I could never see myself driving one.
Fuel economy is directly proportional to how gay it looks. A very gay looking minivan with a V6 still gets better gas mileage than a 4 cylinder truck 😉
I had a Mazda5 while ago, and loved it. I'd go with that over the C-Max if I had to choose. While I'd still consider a Mz5 again, I want something a little bigger and able to haul/tow more than the Mazda did. Plus I want a little more room up front. The Mazda worked, but it was a bit tight. And the 3rd row was more there for show than anything useful.
The complaint I have about the fullsize "mini"vans is that you can't get the higher end options without also paying for the power doors. I haven't seen a power door that I liked. They always seem slow to open/close and almost every one has a number of comments from buyers about having to get them repaired at least once or twice.
That's one thing I loved about the Mazda5. Those doors were light and slid open/close with the flick of your hand.
nope, you can't use EPA mileage. i tried that before and everyone said LOL EPA IS WRONG LOLOLOLThe best 2011 v6 minivan gets 19/28 = 22 combined. A ford ranger I4 gets 22/27 = 24 combined.
FleabagShawnD1 wins again
Or empowered knowing he puts little stock in a sense of self-worth defined by whether he's shuttling his family around in a minivan or a less effective minivan that pretends it's not a minivan because it doesn't have sliding doors.The Flex looks awesome. Buy the Flex.
Despite calling it a "swagger wagon" to try to fool yourself, you will still be emasculated when you drive the Toyota.
Or empowered knowing he puts little stock in a sense of self-worth defined by whether he's shuttling his family around in a minivan or a less effective minivan that pretends it's not a minivan because it doesn't have sliding doors.
This is why I said earlier 2011+ Sienna. It's a nice looking vehicle and can house a stadium in it. This decision really is based on how practical you are. If you are eminently practical, want to cart the family around and visiting relatives and still fit cattle in the back you'll get the Sienna. I see you preferred how it drove, but when you're looking at large vehicles like this drive-ability is of little concern anyway, since they are just appliances.
Option 1 is a used Ford and Option 2 is a new, larger Toyota with little cost difference.
The reasons are explained above in this thread and you've already read them, why ask again?Yeah yeah, self worth blah blah. But why would you choose a frumpy minivan over a stylish Flex?