Update for the whiny ass demoidiots.

[Bowfinger]

Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
carbonyl - if you have proof of any of that I'd love to see it. Especially the AWOL part. Never charged and honorably discharged from service he could have gone to grad school to avoid.

Here you go, from the Boston Globe: One-year gap in Bush's National Guard duty. There was a thread about this a couple of weeks ago.

I'm not interested in getting into a p*ssing match about this, it is what it is. I found the article well-researched and well-balanced. No, Bush was never formally charged with being AWOL. Yes, Bush did miss a year of service, however, making him AWOL in effect. Bush also apparently tried to make up some of the missed time. If I remember the article correctly, this wasn't confirmed with certainty.

 

[Bowfinger]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Man I wish we had a President like Teddy now. The closest Politician to Teddy we have now is John McCain!His disdain for the Religious Hypocrites cost him the Republican Nomination and the Americans a competent President

Hear, hear!

 

[Bowfinger]

Originally posted by: Crazyfool
The Democrats just hate that Bush has a big brass set [ ... ]

Too bad they're between his ears.

 

[sMiLeYz]

"Furthermore, the requests that we have received would involve a significant commitment of resources with a questionable benefit to the public. As a result, in my view, it does not pass a cost-benefit test,"

OK so we have enough money and time, 70 MILLION and 2.5 years to be precise... to fund the investigation into Bill Clinton's penis, BUT not into Bush's frauds, or wait... no one cares if Bush administration BLOCKS the congressional release of the a report documenting the MONUMENTAL INTELLIGENCE FAILURES REGARDING 9/11 ATTACKS under the Bush administration.

Fvcked up times we live in when neo-fascists run the country.

 

[Alistar7]

We never even found out if Clinton was hung or had a teenie weenie either, how good of an investigation could it have been...

 

[Siddhartha]

Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Good for the GAO.

CNN

If Clinton had done this the Republicans would have been all over it like white on rice. It is amazing how unconcerned they appear to be with GWB's activities.

 

[Mean MrMustard]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Here you go Ultra


"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public... Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else."
-- Teddy Roosevelt

Man I wish we had a President like Teddy now. The closest Politician to Teddy we have now is John McCain!His disdain for the Religious Hypocrites cost him the Republican Nomination and the Americans a competent President

I said it once(well, not on this forum), and I'll say it again when running for president model one's self from Teddy and a few others. That quote should mean more now than when is it was said.

 

[Siddhartha]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Here you go Ultra


"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public... Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else."
-- Teddy Roosevelt

Man I wish we had a President like Teddy now. The closest Politician to Teddy we have now is John McCain!His disdain for the Religious Hypocrites cost him the Republican Nomination and the Americans a competent President

Seriously why would do you want T Roosevelt for president?

 

[HappyGamer2]

yes, these actions are another reason we must re-elected the great Dubya.

what's really sad is how some simple minded amereekin's can't see thru this BS. There really isn't nothing wrong with what he did, except for the fact it was another re-election play.

 

[oLLie]

Originally posted by: HappyGamer2
yes, these actions are another reason we must re-elected the great Dubya.

what's really sad is how some simple minded amereekin's can't see thru this BS. There really isn't nothing wrong with what he did, except for the fact it was another re-election play.

Give me an L-I-B-E-R-A-L! Give me an E-L-I-T-I-S-M!

yes, these postings are another reason you must re-studied the great English

 

[sMiLeYz]

Originally posted by: oLLie

Originally posted by: HappyGamer2
yes, these actions are another reason we must re-elected the great Dubya.

what's really sad is how some simple minded amereekin's can't see thru this BS. There really isn't nothing wrong with what he did, except for the fact it was another re-election play.

Give me an L-I-B-E-R-A-L! Give me an E-L-I-T-I-S-M!

yes, these postings are another reason you must re-studied the great English[/quote]

I find it hilariously ironic conservatives accuse liberals of elitism. Not surprising though, conservatives tend to be hypocrites in other things as well.

 

[sMiLeYz]

Originally posted by: Alistar7
We never even found out if Clinton was hung or had a teenie weenie either, how good of an investigation could it have been...

I'm glad you find it amusing, I don't.

 

[sandorski]

Originally posted by: Alistar7
We never even found out if Clinton was hung or had a teenie weenie either, how good of an investigation could it have been...

Once the Repubs found that info out, they probably hid that truth. They didn't need any further embarrassment.

 

[Bowfinger]

Originally posted by: sandorski

Originally posted by: Alistar7
We never even found out if Clinton was hung or had a teenie weenie either, how good of an investigation could it have been...

Once the Repubs found that info out, they probably hid that truth. They didn't need any further embarrassment.

LOL. Maybe that's why the Republicans hated Clinton so much - they were so repulsive not even interns would have them.

 

[UltraQuiet]

I have performed the MOONBEAM DUCK TEST and have come to the conclusion that this is the fault of George Bush.

 

[oLLie]

Originally posted by: sMiLeYz

Originally posted by: oLLie

Originally posted by: HappyGamer2
yes, these actions are another reason we must re-elected the great Dubya.

what's really sad is how some simple minded amereekin's can't see thru this BS. There really isn't nothing wrong with what he did, except for the fact it was another re-election play.

Give me an L-I-B-E-R-A-L! Give me an E-L-I-T-I-S-M!

yes, these postings are another reason you must re-studied the great English

I find it hilariously ironic conservatives accuse liberals of elitism. Not surprising though, conservatives tend to be hypocrites in other things as well.

Wow what a stinging reply. You also managed to clear up all the elitism I thought I saw in the post I italicized. Oh no wait, you didn't. Oh how I wish we could all "see thru this BS", too bad those who don't agree with a specific opinion are too simple minded. Yep, no elitism there.

 

[Alistar7]

Originally posted by: sMiLeYz

Originally posted by: Alistar7
We never even found out if Clinton was hung or had a teenie weenie either, how good of an investigation could it have been...

I'm glad you find it amusing, I don't.

"Rep. Henry Waxman, D-California, had pressed for a "full accounting of the costs associated with the president's trip," asserting it had "clear political overtones" and should not be paid for by taxpayers."

I don't find that too amusing. I htink he was going to congratulate the troops, announcethe war was over, etc...

He was doing his job as Commander in Chief and I have a huge problem with any politician using issues like this for partisianship. There is plenty to criticiize Bush on anyway, is this guy some special brand of idiot?

 

[Gaard]

He didn't actually land the plane, did he?

If he did what he did strictly for honorable and legitimate purposes then I don't see a problem if the price could've been reduced by doing the same thing a different way...(ex. giving the speech after they got to port)

If, however, he did what he did for personal or political gain, then what he did was wrong and Dems and Reps alike should condemn the actions...and take the cost of said action out of his (or his parties) own funds.

 

[Alistar7]

Originally posted by: Gaard
He didn't actually land the plane, did he?

If he did what he did strictly for honorable and legitimate purposes then I don't see a problem if the price could've been reduced by doing the same thing a different way...(ex. giving the speech after they got to port)

If, however, he did what he did for personal or political gain, then what he did was wrong and Dems and Reps alike should condemn the actions...and take the cost of said action out of his (or his parties) own funds.

I think they would gladly pay, you can't get publicity like that during election time usually, it would be a bargain. Seriously though, this is as petty as investigating a blow job.

 

[przero]

"Commander-in-Chief". Fly what he wants. If he has the guts to make a carrier landing, go for it!

 

[glugglug]

Originally posted by: ConclamoLudus
I :heart: when people act surprised that a politician on either side of the fence exploits whatever medium makes him look good. The democrats, if they want to gain power again, have to play a totally different game. They have to stop pointing and screaming, and start planning and scheming. If they want to win some swing voters over, which they'll really need in '04, they had better offer up some damn good solutions real fast. Everywhere I turn lately all I hear about is how the democrats criticize this, the democrats criticize that...If power were in the hands of critics, then Roger Ebert would win an Oscar every year for Best Director. They need to get some unity and get some solutions.

While I've been too numbed by the stupidity of the general populus to be surprised by it any more, if the Americans prove themselves bovine enough to re-elect Bush in '04, regardless of how big an idiot he is running against, I think I will be leaving .... don't know to where yet.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: glugglug

Originally posted by: ConclamoLudus
I :heart: when people act surprised that a politician on either side of the fence exploits whatever medium makes him look good. The democrats, if they want to gain power again, have to play a totally different game. They have to stop pointing and screaming, and start planning and scheming. If they want to win some swing voters over, which they'll really need in '04, they had better offer up some damn good solutions real fast. Everywhere I turn lately all I hear about is how the democrats criticize this, the democrats criticize that...If power were in the hands of critics, then Roger Ebert would win an Oscar every year for Best Director. They need to get some unity and get some solutions.

While I've been too numbed by the stupidity of the general populus to be surprised by it any more, if the Americans prove themselves bovine enough to re-elect Bush in '04, regardless of how big an idiot he is running against, I think I will be leaving .... don't know to where yet.

I hear France is mighty nice or maybe Russia

CkG

Edit - oh and don't let the TSA agent hand hit you in the ass on your way out

 

[przero]

glugglug - " I think I will be leaving .... don't know to where yet."

Yeah right, you and alec baldwin. Sure, try Iran. i'll chip in on the ticket!