<< Did you watch the episode? They kicked a$$ on this mission. Bravo was just perfect on this mission. His team was 5-1 going in with the one lost to an undefeated team. I'd say they did very well. >>
1 man killed @ 25 minutes vs. 0 men killed @ 19 minutes. 6 minutes! We never saw how the one team who never won a single event would have done, they might have done just as good as Delta. We only saw one other team do that mission, so we don't know that 1 man killed @ 25 minutes was all that great.
Did you ever see how Scott responded to his own mistakes? Ho hum, guess "we" gotta do better next time. But, someone else makes a mistake, watch the hell out, it was "their" mistake, not the team's. What a loser.
What I meant was what did Helveston do besides distracting his team from their missions and instead making them spend their energies worrying about 'Uh oh, what is wrong with Scott now and how can we correct this problem?' Besides being the DIVISIVE member of the team who brought out the worst in everyone else? Besides all those 'attributes', what the hell did all of Helveston's antics and tantrums get them?
Was all Scott's BS worth it? There was no second place.
In the end, it was the cooler heads who prevailed, as usual.