sixone
Lifer
UPDATE: Man has been identified.
http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2012/05/11/police-man-throws-hot-coffee-on-donut-shop-employee/
Yay!
One scumbag down, one to go.
Last edited:
UPDATE: Man has been identified.
http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2012/05/11/police-man-throws-hot-coffee-on-donut-shop-employee/
So was he actually caught or just IDed?
The 2nd link you posted only says they IDed the man.
I this talk about Philly makes me think of this guy for some reason:
![]()
Yeah, he MOVED OUT!
Not at all, I could find plenty of videos of people not black doing dumb shit. You almost never see a white person doing dumb shit video posted here though. That's because those videos don't help support the posters racist thoughts. They need it to be only videos of blacks so they can say "seeeeeee!" I literally never see a video of white people doing shit posted on here, yet on WSHH I see videos of white people doing shit as bad if not worse than this one all the time.
$2.25 or $2.40, whatever
oh the irony
I have also observed this same behavior without bias and come to the same conclusion.The irony of what? there are plenty of said videos, but they're never posted here. That's not irony at all, that's just a fact being stated. It's ironic how any video of a person posted of a person doing bad shit like this here is black, and it's perfectly fine. Yet Sandeagle gets shitted on because he posts links to videos/stories of cops being asshats.
Can you imagine if it was $3.50?Gold/tan Cadillac, tan suit, bodyguard in sports clothing. Nothing betrays a neighborhood gangster. Dude made a ruckus over $2.40? Unbelievable.
The irony of what? there are plenty of said videos, but they're never posted here. That's not irony at all, that's just a fact being stated. It's ironic how any video of a person posted of a person doing bad shit like this here is black, and it's perfectly fine. Yet Sandeagle gets shitted on because he posts links to videos/stories of cops being asshats.
The irony of what? there are plenty of said videos, but they're never posted here. That's not irony at all, that's just a fact being stated. It's ironic how any video of a person posted of a person doing bad shit like this here is black, and it's perfectly fine. Yet Sandeagle gets shitted on because he posts links to videos/stories of cops being asshats.
Not at all, I could find plenty of videos of people not black doing dumb shit. You almost never see a white person doing dumb shit video posted here though. That's because those videos don't help support the posters racist thoughts. They need it to be only videos of blacks so they can say "seeeeeee!" I literally never see a video of white people doing shit posted on here, yet on WSHH I see videos of white people doing shit as bad if not worse than this one all the time.
what's ironic is that you bitch about a predominantly white/asian forum being racists and then you use the errr.. blackest? site on the whole freaking internet to back up your claim about white people.
I'm not saying you're wrong or anything, but it comes across as quite ironic.
There probably are many white people who do this but its not as common as minorities. I have seen many minorities of different races engage in this manner
Exactly, WSHH is a site that's clearly biased to showing black people doing retarded shit. Yet they still manage to post a good number of videos of non black people doing retarded shit too. ATOT can't even make that claim.
Depends on where you live, in a trailer trash town it will be just as common as in a minority filled ghetto. Of course people in the ghetto will act ignorant, but no worse than trailer trash. I've seen just as many of both act a damn fool. It's also not common for minorities in nice neighborhoods to act like the dude in this video. In fact there are places like Baldwin Hills which are predominately black where you'll never see shit worth video taping happen.
Stay classy, you seem to be really familiar with world star hip hop? You like the knock out game or do you like it even more when knock out gets shot dead as much as I do?
Do you enjoy urban youths viciously attacking somebody and then robbing them as they lay dazed? Does that give you the giggles? "ooooooooooooh....he got popped yo! yo! grab his goods, right classy?"
You are celebrating the behavior that MLK abhorred. Shame on you racist, shame, shame, shame on you.
It's coming to a head where this kind of animal behavior is going to be put down, and it's not going to be pretty. A certain culture celebrates the reaction of being disrespected, the other culture is saying "keep pushing, you may end up dead".
Your attitude and blatant racism is NOT welcome in society.
I don't get the being sued part, good samaritan laws or or citizen's arrest covers that. Bodily harm is obviously another thing but you can get involved without a physical altercation. Get the license plate, a good description, photo, or anything else that may help the cops.
Van Horn v Watson: Medical Care and Nonmedical Care
In a December 2008 case, the California Supreme Court narrowed the application of the Good Samaritans statute. In Van Horn v. Watson, the court held that the legislature only intended for the statute to provide immunity to those who rendered emergency medical care at the scene of a medical emergency and not those who provided nonmedical care or assistance.
In Van Horn, the defendant Lisa Torti pulled her friend Alexandra Van Horn out of a car following an accident. Torti claimed she removed Van Horn from the car because she feared it was going to catch on fire or explode. Van Horn suffered serious injuries as a result of the accident, including permanent paralysis. She claimed that by removing her from the car, Torti had exacerbated her injuries and caused the irreversible damage to her spinal cord.
Torti claimed she was immune from civil liability for Van Horn's injuries under the Good Samaritans law. The trial court agreed. On appeal, however, the court reversed the lower court's decision and found that the statute did not apply to Torti because she provided nonmedical rather than medical care. The California Supreme Court later upheld the appellate court's decision.
By narrowing the application of the state's Good Samaritans law, the California Supreme Court sent a message to citizens of the state: to provide help following an accident is to risk civil liability.
I been that store several times. And I believe I know the person who he burnt. I am glad they got him and I hope he goes to prison for this. The only thing disrespectful is a bag of **** like you.