• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

UPDATE: Car Thief Shot and Killed

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Baked
Originally posted by: dr150
Originally posted by: Baked
Originally posted by: dr150
You CANNOT go killing people just for stealing a friggin car. This ain't a fair trade-off folks!

I hope she goes to jail for this!

I hope a gang comes into your house at night, tie up your family and clear out everything in it, including your cars.

Your a friggin moron to wish that on anyone. Typical loser!

Again, I hope your house get broken into and car stolen every week, low life sympathizer. But I guess you wouldn't understand since you don't have a family nor had your house broken into or car stolen. Go live in the ghetto.

Ps. Not everyone, just you.


Baked,
You're just a loser. Plain and simple.
 
Originally posted by: dr150
Originally posted by: Baked
Originally posted by: dr150
Originally posted by: Baked
Originally posted by: dr150
You CANNOT go killing people just for stealing a friggin car. This ain't a fair trade-off folks!

I hope she goes to jail for this!

I hope a gang comes into your house at night, tie up your family and clear out everything in it, including your cars.

Your a friggin moron to wish that on anyone. Typical loser!

Again, I hope your house get broken into and car stolen every week, low life sympathizer. But I guess you wouldn't understand since you don't have a family nor had your house broken into or car stolen. Go live in the ghetto.

Ps. Not everyone, just you.


Baked,
You're just a loser. Plain and simple.

You are simply an idiot, it ifgures you live in California the bastion of liberal stupidity. You should ALWAYS be able to use deadly force to protect yourself, your family, and your possessions.....PERIOD. Criminals should be extended no rights once they break the law. I am very glad I live in a state where the Government is not a bunch of idiots because they understand and protect MY rights to protect MY PROPERTY. Come to Texas and pull this crap and we can shoot you dead on the spot without fear of getting in trouble, just like it should be.
 
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: dr150
Originally posted by: Baked
Originally posted by: dr150
Originally posted by: Baked
Originally posted by: dr150
You CANNOT go killing people just for stealing a friggin car. This ain't a fair trade-off folks!

I hope she goes to jail for this!
I hope a gang comes into your house at night, tie up your family and clear out everything in it, including your cars.
Your a friggin moron to wish that on anyone. Typical loser!
Again, I hope your house get broken into and car stolen every week, low life sympathizer. But I guess you wouldn't understand since you don't have a family nor had your house broken into or car stolen. Go live in the ghetto.

Ps. Not everyone, just you.
Baked,
You're just a loser. Plain and simple.
You are simply an idiot, it ifgures you live in California the bastion of liberal stupidity. You should ALWAYS be able to use deadly force to protect yourself, your family, and your possessions.....PERIOD. I sexually molest cats, and that's the way I like it. No one, especially my government, can tell me otherwise. Criminals should be extended no rights once they break the law. I am very glad I live in a state where the Government is not a bunch of idiots because they understand and protect MY rights to protect MY PROPERTY. Come to Texas and pull this crap and we can shoot you dead on the spot without fear of getting in trouble, just like it should be.

It's admirable that Baked supports the use and decrim of marijuana, but it's the only valid political opinion he holds. He's not a nice guy, and he's not a hippie. The fact that Ronstang just wrote a paragraph in his supoprt is more damning than anything I could ever say.
 
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: mugs
What difference does it make if he's dead or not?

For starters, we the taxpayers won't need to feed his sorry ass while he's incarcerated.

You totally took my words out of context. 🙂
 
Originally posted by: Baked
Originally posted by: dr150
You CANNOT go killing people just for stealing a friggin car. This ain't a fair trade-off folks!

I hope she goes to jail for this!

I hope a gang comes into your house at night, tie up your family and clear out everything in it, including your cars.

😀, me laughs!
 
Originally posted by: JDMnAR1
Pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes 15A-401 (d) (2): "A law enforcement
officer is justified in using deadly physical force upon another person only when it
appears to be reasonably necessary thereby:

a. To defend himself or a third person from what he reasonably believes to be the use
or imminent use of deadly physical force;

b. To effect an arrest or to prevent the escape from custody of a person who he
reasonably believes is attempting to escape by means of a deadly weapon, or who
by his conduct or any other means indicates that he presents an imminent threat of
death or serious physical injury to others unless apprehended without delay; or

c. To prevent the escape of a person from custody imposed upon him as a result of
conviction for a felony."

I'm gonna take this post as a support of the woman'd actions because it's clear and unambiguous that the theif clearly broke part b of that. With this, it's clear that the off-duty officer was in the right.
 
Originally posted by: Mermaidman


Obviously no details of the incident, but if the thief did not endanger the shooter, I bet that she's going to be in some kind of trouble or other. Would you be angry enough to kill someone for stealing your stuff? I would.

yes
 
Originally posted by: Lizardman
Originally posted by: Mermaidman


Obviously no details of the incident, but if the thief did not endanger the shooter, I bet that she's going to be in some kind of trouble or other. Would you be angry enough to kill someone for stealing your stuff? I would.

yes

 
Originally posted by: chambersc
Originally posted by: JDMnAR1
Pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes 15A-401 (d) (2): "A law enforcement
officer is justified in using deadly physical force upon another person only when it
appears to be reasonably necessary thereby:

a. To defend himself or a third person from what he reasonably believes to be the use
or imminent use of deadly physical force;

b. To effect an arrest or to prevent the escape from custody of a person who he
reasonably believes is attempting to escape by means of a deadly weapon, or who
by his conduct or any other means indicates that he presents an imminent threat of
death or serious physical injury to others unless apprehended without delay; or

c. To prevent the escape of a person from custody imposed upon him as a result of
conviction for a felony."

I'm gonna take this post as a support of the woman'd actions because it's clear and unambiguous that the theif clearly broke part b of that. With this, it's clear that the off-duty officer was in the right.

I'll agree to that.
 
Originally posted by: bernse
Originally posted by: BurnItDwn
A car is a deadly weapon. I'm pretty sure people get killed by moving cars all the time. Therefore, the car thief was in possession of a deadly weapon. The off duty officer was just defending herself from the madman with a deadly weapon.


Yes, but the officer has to feel her life is in jeprody. Simply possesing a car doesn't allow the cops to open fire on it.

Not true, if she felt that ANYONE is endanger / threatened then the shooting is justified since she is a law enforcement officer.
 
I would also think that the if the officer IDed herself as the police that would make a difference. If she didnt' say STOP POLICE, weren't there be more trouble for her?
 
Originally posted by: RedCOMET
I would also think that the if the officer IDed herself as the police that would make a difference. If she didnt' say STOP POLICE, weren't there be more trouble for her?
Well . . . It will be her word against the dead thief's word. Who you gonna believe?
 
I don't know how it works down there but in Alaska the police have the right to use deadly force if they observe a suspect committing a felony. If she identified her self as a cop, told him to stop and he kept at it then she would have been within her legal means as a law enforcement officer to shoot him.

After any shooting it is normal for the officer involved to be placed on leave or reassigned to administrative duties while an investigation is conducted.

My guess is she will be cleared of any wrong doing.

As for the guy she shot... sux to be him. If he had been home drinking a beer or working on his resume instead of stealing cars it never would have happened. Good riddance.
 
Originally posted by: BurnItDwn
A car is a deadly weapon. I'm pretty sure people get killed by moving cars all the time. Therefore, the car thief was in possession of a deadly weapon. The off duty officer was just defending herself from the madman with a deadly weapon.

😉
 
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: dr150
Originally posted by: Baked
Originally posted by: dr150
Originally posted by: Baked
Originally posted by: dr150
You CANNOT go killing people just for stealing a friggin car. This ain't a fair trade-off folks!

I hope she goes to jail for this!

I hope a gang comes into your house at night, tie up your family and clear out everything in it, including your cars.

Your a friggin moron to wish that on anyone. Typical loser!

Again, I hope your house get broken into and car stolen every week, low life sympathizer. But I guess you wouldn't understand since you don't have a family nor had your house broken into or car stolen. Go live in the ghetto.

Ps. Not everyone, just you.


Baked,
You're just a loser. Plain and simple.

You are simply an idiot, it figures you live in California the bastion of liberal stupidity. You should ALWAYS be able to use deadly force to protect yourself, your family, and your possessions.....PERIOD. Criminals should be extended no rights once they break the law. I am very glad I live in a state where the Government is not a bunch of idiots because they understand and protect MY rights to protect MY PROPERTY. Come to Texas and pull this crap and we can shoot you dead on the spot without fear of getting in trouble, just like it should be.

I'm with Ron and Baked on this one. I hope Dr150 never tries to steal anything from my home in Houston TX, I have a Glock 19C with a strapped on flashlight.

I had my $500 Dave Mirra Haro Bike stolen from my stairways at my duplex apt, it was locked up and mounted to the wall. I left the stairwell open for fedex to deliver some packages while at work. Didn't think these low lifes would have the balls to come into my stairwell and rip the bike off the wall even though it was mounted to a bike rack attached to a stud in the wall and chained up to the wall rack! :|

Then a few weeks later they go around back and steal my little girls Barbie Power Wheels car I bought her for Xmas. :|

She's only 4 and keeps asking where's my car daddy?

Then they break into my neighbors car and steal his radio.

I work hard for my money and don't have all the luxuries in life. Going to someones home and stealing $400 bikes, $400 Xmas gifts, $300 car stereos and breaking ppls windows is NOT ACCEPTABLE! Calling the police will do nothing other than file a report and thats it. I cannot afford to buy a new bike or barbie car everytime some low life loser decides he can go over to my property and take whatever he wants without any consequences. A dumba$$ liberal would wait until the police show up, but by that time the thieves are long gone with the goods and you're left with a police report. 99% of the time the items are not recovered, as police don't have time to waste hunting down ppl who steal Barbie Power Wheels, Expensive BMX Bikes, Car stereos, etc.... they're busy looking for murders, rapists, bank robbers, etc.... This is a big city.

No more free sh1t from my place anymore! FVCK THAT!

These sons of b1tches come back and try stealing more sh1t from me, they won't be so lucky this time.

Thank god I live in Texas.... I don't have to worry about dumba$$e$ like Dr150 protecting the bastards stealing thousands of dollars of my sh1t!

You sir are an idiot!
 
This happened in North Carolina, folks. Major progun and pro self-defense state.

I seem to recall a news story of a shop owner in N.C. killing an unarmed robber a few years ago. The local prosecutor was quoted as saying something along the lines of "The bottom line here is, the good guy won and the bad guy lost. That's the way its supposed to be." No charges were filed.

Of course, there can be and are major blighted urban centers controlled by gun-hating politicians and police chiefs, even in states that overwhelmingly are progun.

Edit: More info...
Arrington has an extensive criminal history in North Carolina, including several convictions for financial card theft and possession of stolen goods.
 
Originally posted by: Mermaidman
The plot thickens . . .

Police officer involved in shooting previously investigated
8/30/2005 12:38 PM
By: News 14 Carolina Staff

(RALEIGH) - The off-duty police officer who shot a man Sunday morning has been investigated before.

Tuesday?s News and Observer reports that cab driver Jide Akindele complained to city officials that Officer Michelle Peele had physically and verbally abused him . . .

probably justified
 
Back
Top