UPDATE: Canon S200's now shipping! Dell pre-order on the Canon S200 digital camera, $289.10! S330, $335! Part II

Page 14 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

LS20

Banned
Jan 22, 2002
5,858
0
0


<< How do I check what's the battery life of this thing?? Am I suppose to estimate it?? >>



my problem also..apparently there's only a low-battery indicator.

however, if you plug ur camera in and open zoombrower EX, they have a battery gauge in there that *should* be progressive
 

saimike

Senior member
Oct 30, 2000
393
0
0
how many ppl have got their s200? lets not turn this into a "how do i take pics" or "how do i use this" thread ...
 

cLiPLiK

Senior member
Apr 20, 2001
207
0
0
why not? i think most ppl who ordered when the deal started, (3/28-4/2) have gotten their s200's already, or they are on the way
where better place to discuss how to use?
btw, how come the s200 is priced lower than the s110? is it supposed to be a downgrade or something? i thot s110 prices are gonna fall now that s200 is out but that doesn't seem to be the case
 

foggy

Senior member
Jul 28, 2001
213
0
0
For photography newbies, they should look up many of the available camera taking resources and tips on the web. But are some comments after browsing some of the replies on this thread:

ASA/ISO - same thing. ASA= American Standards Association. They use it as a guide for film speed (you know, when you buy film you can buy with different speed). You should use the term ISO more widely though, since it is internationally known. I don't quite know how they got the numbers for this, but they relate to how much light is needed to properly expose the film. The higher the ISO rating, the less light needed. Eg. ISO 200 requires half as much light as ISO 100 to properly expose the film.

So, all it does is give you the control over what aperture or shutter speed to use. Since we have a digital camera, this rating is a guide (it is estimated). Many digital camera reviews have said that the Canon ISO value of 50 is really actually ISO 100 - Canon picked 50 probably for marketing purporses. If you have a low light situation, cranking up the ISO will crank up the sensitivity of the CCD sensor and thus produce more noise in your shots. However, it allows for faster shutter speeds (less light remember?) and so will make your pictures look sharper since your hands won't have to be too still (unless you have a tripod).

As for blurry pictures on the macro - the macro range on this camera is not very good. Try focussing from a farther distance back. The best macro I've seen is by Nikon digital cameras. You can go as close as 1-2 inches! Amazing results.

LS20 - you are right. The field of depth isn't very good at all compared to real cameras... dunno why. Maybe it's the size of the lens that plays a part in this.
 

alurtech

Junior Member
Feb 7, 2002
18
0
0
very good site for digital photagraphy is here. check it out
btw, there is no indicator for how much you got left on your battery, but at the end of the manual they give you some estimates. I already went thru 2 charges. Used it all day with the display on (1st day got it), so I would say about 5 hours, taking pics with lcd on and flash in most cases.
 

LS20

Banned
Jan 22, 2002
5,858
0
0
well, the test at dpreview said it can last 180 shots with 'typical' usage...

so theres one estimation
 

pbrain

Senior member
Dec 7, 2000
560
0
0
Darn it. I ordered 3/29, Dell says it shipped 5/2, but I still don't have it and it's not even in the FedEx tracking system yet.

edit: the s200, that is.
 

jplee3

Senior member
Feb 15, 2001
333
0
76
i've been playing around with it more and i'm really lovin it... as far as the heat goes --- i'm wondering if it possibly might be getting warmer because of the battery...? i mean, the battery does last longer than the standard NB-1L that the S110 was using, so could that be a cause of the higher amt of heat? hmm i dunno... as for the LCD, i still could've sworn there was a little clearer picture on the S110's, but it doesn't bother me much anyway - as long as the camera works and takes nice pics (which it does)!
 
Nov 17, 2001
171
0
0
wow, this compactflash card SUCKS. 1600x1200 superfine can fit 9 images on there. What resolution & compression do you guys use to take your pictures?

Hopefully my viking arrives soon. The camera seems really cool, but i can't get a good shutter speed indoors. It keeps saying low-light, even with all our lights on. Oh well, I just take pictures with the flash off.
 

LukFilm

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
6,128
1
0


<< wow, this compactflash card SUCKS. 1600x1200 superfine can fit 9 images on there. What resolution & compression do you guys use to take your pictures?

Hopefully my viking arrives soon. The camera seems really cool, but i can't get a good shutter speed indoors. It keeps saying low-light, even with all our lights on. Oh well, I just take pictures with the flash off.
>>


We got 128MB/256MB CF cards.
 

zboy

Member
Jun 12, 2001
73
0
0


<< I just took some close-up of some salad and it is blurry..... I know my S110 shots were razor sharp is it just me or am doing something wrong?
The ASA is set to 50. Maybe I should crank that up?
>>



Just figured out why S200's Macro mode is worse than S110. It is not the problem of the lens. It is due to S200 takes a little bit longer time to foucs. you have to hold it still to get a better close-up shot. Try a tripod, you will see the difference.