an accord coupe ex 4cyl is listing onhondas site for $24,045. On Edmunds it came to $23,443 without choosing nay options.
Originally posted by: RossMAN
You lease a luxury car or SUV not a Honda Civic.
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: RossMAN
You lease a luxury car or SUV not a Honda Civic.
Why do you make that distinction?
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: RossMAN
You lease a luxury car or SUV not a Honda Civic.
Why do you make that distinction?
Because leasing can be useful to get more car than you could afford to purhcase otherwise. It's not financially beneficial (obviously) but it does offer some tangible benefit vs buying a cheaper car (you get to drive around in a BMW).
Leasing a Civic is just stupid.
Originally posted by: vi_edit
an accord coupe ex 4cyl is listing onhondas site for $24,045. On Edmunds it came to $23,443 without choosing nay options.
Other than a sunroof, what options doesn't the SE Accord have over the Civic? It's got power everything short of a seat(which the Civic doesn't have) and it's a more comfortable vehicle that costs you $1500 less up front, less a month, and is a 12 month shorter term.
That's an expensive sunroof.
Edit: you can get an Accord EX for $259 a month and $1700 down. Still way better than the Civic deal.
See, that's exactly why I think leasing an expensive car is generally a terrible idea - people do it so they can get more car than they can really afford, but financially it's a terrible decision.
Originally posted by: BillyBatson
Originally posted by: vi_edit
an accord coupe ex 4cyl is listing onhondas site for $24,045. On Edmunds it came to $23,443 without choosing nay options.
Other than a sunroof, what options doesn't the SE Accord have over the Civic? It's got power everything short of a seat(which the Civic doesn't have) and it's a more comfortable vehicle that costs you $1500 less up front, less a month, and is a 12 month shorter term.
That's an expensive sunroof.
Edit: you can get an Accord EX for $259 a month and $1700 down. Still way better than the Civic deal.
I do not want an accord, but where are you seeing the ex for that much?
BD2003:
Right i am not loaded so money does matter to me but only up to a point. To be honest i can afford to spend $700 a month on a car prior to insurance etc without it affecting my life or bills in any way other than the other fun i have such as going out, drinking, girls, random shopping, etc, expensive good, and other random spending. Doesn't mean i am going to do it and not just because i am unwilling to change the way i life my life just to own a $700/mo car but also you never know what will happen money wise down the line. But having said that yes i am more comfortable with the thought of paying $250 a month for 10 years over paying $500 a month for 3.5 years while most of you would call anyone crazy for not taking the latter and from a longterm financial standpoint you would be right.
I can call today and have them run numbers for a buy. Even then though i don't many of you see how a civic can cost $20k with tax, title, and so forth lol
Originally posted by: vi_edit
See, that's exactly why I think leasing an expensive car is generally a terrible idea - people do it so they can get more car than they can really afford, but financially it's a terrible decision.
With an "expensive" car typically comes free maintenance over the life of the lease. You never drop a dime in repairs. Never have to pay for lucrative repair bills out of warranty. Never even have to buy new tires. You just turn in the keys after 3 years and get a new one.
If you have the money, it's quite convenient.
Originally posted by: vi_edit
See, that's exactly why I think leasing an expensive car is generally a terrible idea - people do it so they can get more car than they can really afford, but financially it's a terrible decision.
With an "expensive" car typically comes free maintenance over the life of the lease. You never drop a dime in repairs. Never have to pay for lucrative repair bills out of warranty. Never even have to buy new tires. You just turn in the keys after 3 years and get a new one.
If you have the money, it's quite convenient.
Originally posted by: JS80
the words "lease" and "civic" should not be in the same sentence.
Originally posted by: RossMAN
You lease a luxury car or SUV not a Honda Civic.
Originally posted by: goodoptics
Originally posted by: JS80
the words "lease" and "civic" should not be in the same sentence.
Originally posted by: RossMAN
You lease a luxury car or SUV not a Honda Civic.
QFT!
OP: WTF?Bad lease IMHO. Instead of throwing away $16K in 4 years, why not just get a 2-yr old Civic and own it outright? Those things are almost bullet-proof, and little maintenance is required. It's going to be only 6-yr old after 48 months. If you don't want to keep it then, I'm sure you will be able to sell it for a nice chunk of money.
Also, if you decide to go with the stupid lease, what are you going to do when the lease is up in four years? Throw away money again on another lease of a Civic?![]()
That really just doesn't matter. The Civic is not worth $20K, any way you slice it. If you do anything, see if you can get a clearout 06.Originally posted by: BillyBatson
Originally posted by: fbrdphreak
What a stupid idea. That's like having a short-term loan with a really high interest rate, assuming you choose to purchase it. And the new Civic just is not worth $20K in the first place. My gf got a brand new 06 Civic Ex coupe (tan-ish exterior, dark interior, automatic, all options except Navi) and with buying two of them at the same time, came out like $19,500 (can't remember if its OTD or not). As nice as it is for a Civic, it is still a damn economy car and is NOT worth $20K. Honda is making a killing on these Civics...
d00d prices go up. remember the says when the Altima competed with civic, corolla, etc? and Senta competed with Tercel and the like? over the years nissan brought their product line higher to where the altima competes with camry and accord, sentra with civic and corolla, and the maxima well toyota just intro-ed the avalon..
oh and the corolla is supposed to be cheap too right? On toyotas sites if you pick the top model and the package most similar with the civic ex the prices MRSP comes to $19,381 , only $1400 less prior to tax etc
Originally posted by: zainali
if u are leasing, lease a hyundai / some american car which depreciates like crazy.
leasing a honda/toyota is pointless cause there resale value barely goes down.
Originally posted by: Imdmn04
Originally posted by: zainali
if u are leasing, lease a hyundai / some american car which depreciates like crazy.
leasing a honda/toyota is pointless cause there resale value barely goes down.
Ummm. No.
When you lease, you want to lease a car that has minimal depreciation.
Since your lease payments are essentially depreciation over the lease period plus interest, the less the depreciation, the cheaper the payment.
You always want to lease a car with good resale value (high residual).
original price of car = depreciation over lease period + residual value (market value of the car after the lease period)
If residual is high, then depreciation will be low, then naturally, payments will be low.
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
Because leasing can be useful to get more car than you could afford to purhcase otherwise. It's not financially beneficial (obviously) but it does offer some tangible benefit vs buying a cheaper car (you get to drive around in a BMW).
Leasing a Civic is just stupid.
Viper GTS
