And if shuttle has a nforce2 miniPC out yet (I think they do, don't they?) .. that would be a nice addition
Originally posted by: DeAdLyDaVe
I think I win for having the oldest (crappiest) computer here. Actually it's not that bad, but I'd love to have a new nforce2 board.
Originally posted by: davidos
What is the drawback to "2 phase power" that the Asus board has? Do the others have 3 phase?
what is the difference between 2 phase and 3 phase power? How can that affect a Mobo?
Originally posted by: Dbird
Just checked out the Digit-Life review and found it pretty lacking. I'm trying to decide between the Abit and Epox boards (Asus only has two phase power). It looks like the Abit only lets you up the Vcore to 1.8 vs 2.2 on the Epox, but the Epox doesn't allow you to up the Chipset voltage. I havn't heard much on chipset voltage, how important is it to overclocking and how does it help you?
Originally posted by: Odeen
Soundstorm or no soundstorm, ALC-650 is not the first thing I have in mind when it comes to sound quality. Even if the "digital" part of the chipset is superior (read: Can do the whole DS3D and EAX and A3D bit with low CPU utilization), having a crappy DAC will lower the sound quality that we actually hear.
Here's what I ideally would like tested:
1) Objective audio quality tests of a motherboard with ALC-650 (Asus, Epox), CMI9739A (MSI) versus a Turtle Beach Santa Cruz and/or Audigy 2.
2) Objective CPU utilization tests for 2d and 3d sound (Fire up Quake 3 or your favorite CPU-bound game heavy on 3d sound and benchmark:
KT400 with no sound
KT400 with built-in AC'97
KT400 with high-end soundcard (Audigy2 or Santa Cruz or Game Theater XP)
Nforce2 with no sound
Nforce2 with Soundstorm sound (analog only)
Nforce2 with high-end soundcard
Nforce2 with Soundstorm doing DD encodinging of 3d sound
Possibly, Nforce2 with AC'97 only
3) ANY problems with using DD encoding for 3d games. According to a friend of mine who bought the Asus A7N266-C (Nforce 415D chipset, no video but first-generation APU), he had some issues with EAX and DS3D not encoding correctly to his DD/DTS speaker system. Please test the compatibility of the new APU with 3d sound.
if you think the DAC is crappy then don't use it. Use the digital out on the asus board (i think the Epox has it on a seperate piece as well) and send it right to your speakers.Originally posted by: Odeen
Soundstorm or no soundstorm, ALC-650 is not the first thing I have in mind when it comes to sound quality. Even if the "digital" part of the chipset is superior (read: Can do the whole DS3D and EAX and A3D bit with low CPU utilization), having a crappy DAC will lower the sound quality that we actually hear.
Could this also mean that the Realtek chips will basically not have any effect on sound quality?Kind of difficult to see from the above picture due to their tiny size, 3 Realtek physical interfaces sit around the 8x AGP port. The ALC650 (6-channel sound, bottom left), RTL8201B (10/100 LAN, middle), and RTL8801B (Firewire, right). Why are these here when we have all of these features integrated from the MCP-T ? The reason lies in the fact that the NVIDIA features need physical routing to the ports that they work from. What that means is that no Realtek chips will show up in your device manager - they're just there to ensure that the features are routed properly to the headers and backplane.
Could this also mean that the Realtek chips will basically not have any effect on sound quality?
With that in mind, and the ABIT NF7-S completely unlocking our XP2400+, I used a single module of Corsair XMS3200 that has seen 225MHz+ at weak timings and 2.7v. Even though I could boot into BIOS perfectly at 212FSB (10x212), the motherboard steadfastly refused to boot correctly into Windows XP above 188FSB. It wouldn't even get to the Windows XP splash screen. Considering that entering BIOS can be done without having a hard drive installed, I have a sneaking suspicion that the PCI bus is unlocked above 166FSB. I also tried 205FSB in the hope that a 6:1 FSBCI ratio was present. No go there either. I'm a little disappointed due to the expectation of benchmarking at 10x200+ with dual-channel DDR400. This will need further investigation. It looks like a PCI-related limitation, as BIOS is fine at 200FSB+. Here is the BIOS at 212FSB. Note that it has actually booted in at those speeds shown below.
Originally posted by: Palek
Thanks for the link, kgraeme, that was quite a good read.
I am still hoping that at least one reviewer out there on the web will choose to test the audio quality on these nForce2 motherboards. The roundup at digit-life left a bitter taste in my mouth. People whack together a few charts with info they grabbed from the manufacturers' websites, paste in some pretty graphs, and then call it a review... Sheesh. I guess they had to be lazy otherwise they would not have been the first site with a round-up...![]()
Originally posted by: SFang
I am going to die waiting for this review. Checking Anandtech once per hour every day is just not the way I used to live. :|