imported_kitty
Junior Member
- Aug 18, 2004
- 19
- 0
- 0
reply WT,
I also tested a piar of Geil 512M DDR400 on thte K8AN2E-GR and they worked excellent.
I also tested a piar of Geil 512M DDR400 on thte K8AN2E-GR and they worked excellent.
Originally posted by: wpenhall
Question for you SL-K8AN2E-GR owners:
I'm thinking about picking up this board to complement an A64 3400+, but I have some concern about the layout. I have a Gainward 6800GT that extends down to the first PCI slot due to the hugh-jass cooler assembly. Looking at the board layout on Newegg, it looks like the chipset heatsink may interfere with 2-slot GPUs.
Anyone able to fit a 2-slot card (like a 6800 Ultra) in there no problem? Or can anyone tell me if the top of the heatsink is lower than or flush with the top of the AGP slot? It's a bit hard to tell from the pictures.
Thanks!
Originally posted by: cyberknight
no, ATI cards should not lose performance. I'm sure ATI could sue nVidia if they were purposely making their chipsets like that. Don't worry about matching your manufacturers. Just get what you see is the best value. All the manufacturers essentially "borrow" the technology to make their own product anyhow.
like an ATI Radeon 9800PRO is pretty much the same as the Sapphire or MSI one.
Depending on your budget, you should go for AT LEAST a video card with a Radeon 9800 PRO chipset (and make sure you get a 256-bit version). If you want to go high end, look to one of the 6800 nVidia cards or an ATI X800 card.
as for overclocking, I can't help you there...
Originally posted by: cyberknight
no, ATI cards should not lose performance. I'm sure ATI could sue nVidia if they were purposely making their chipsets like that. Don't worry about matching your manufacturers. Just get what you see is the best value. All the manufacturers essentially "borrow" the technology to make their own product anyhow.
like an ATI Radeon 9800PRO is pretty much the same as the Sapphire or MSI one.
Depending on your budget, you should go for AT LEAST a video card with a Radeon 9800 PRO chipset (and make sure you get a 256-bit version). If you want to go high end, look to one of the 6800 nVidia cards or an ATI X800 card.
as for overclocking, I can't help you there...
Originally posted by: CraigRT
Originally posted by: cyberknight
no, ATI cards should not lose performance. I'm sure ATI could sue nVidia if they were purposely making their chipsets like that. Don't worry about matching your manufacturers. Just get what you see is the best value. All the manufacturers essentially "borrow" the technology to make their own product anyhow.
like an ATI Radeon 9800PRO is pretty much the same as the Sapphire or MSI one.
Depending on your budget, you should go for AT LEAST a video card with a Radeon 9800 PRO chipset (and make sure you get a 256-bit version). If you want to go high end, look to one of the 6800 nVidia cards or an ATI X800 card.
as for overclocking, I can't help you there...
9800 Pro paired with my A64 3200+ is a fantastic combo.. pumps out plenty of FPS and is stable and reliable as anything... I :heart: my system, and I :heart: my 4th Soltek mobo.
Originally posted by: VVarewolf
Originally posted by: CraigRT
Originally posted by: cyberknight
no, ATI cards should not lose performance. I'm sure ATI could sue nVidia if they were purposely making their chipsets like that. Don't worry about matching your manufacturers. Just get what you see is the best value. All the manufacturers essentially "borrow" the technology to make their own product anyhow.
like an ATI Radeon 9800PRO is pretty much the same as the Sapphire or MSI one.
Depending on your budget, you should go for AT LEAST a video card with a Radeon 9800 PRO chipset (and make sure you get a 256-bit version). If you want to go high end, look to one of the 6800 nVidia cards or an ATI X800 card.
as for overclocking, I can't help you there...
9800 Pro paired with my A64 3200+ is a fantastic combo.. pumps out plenty of FPS and is stable and reliable as anything... I :heart: my system, and I :heart: my 4th Soltek mobo.
Just a question...what exactly IS considered plenty of FPS? I think I read somewhere that below 30 was visible to the eye.
Originally posted by: cpotter
Thanks wpenhall. Would love to know how it turns out. Will check back. Chad