Mar 17, 2002
579
0
0
Has anyone figured this out yet? I am at my max of 380x9 with stock chipset cooling. Here is a picture of my bios that looks like it can be changed but I cant get it to work.

Link to picture

Edit - WTF? I cant change my profile!! ??
Anyways, here is what I have:

ASUS P5W64 WS Professional
E6600
OCZ EL DDR2 PC2-8000 (2x1GB)
Areca ARC-1280 soon <-
4 x WD 500GB
20 x Maxtor 300GB
More soon
 

n7

Elite Member
Jan 4, 2004
21,281
4
81
Just because the bios shows higher multis doesn't mean your chip can use them :confused:

Your E6600 is locked @ 9 or lower like all the others.
 

lopri

Elite Member
Jul 27, 2002
13,314
689
126
So you can't punch in 10 instead of 9 for the ratio? Swap the keyboard and try again. :D Report back with the exact stepping along with the revision info of the board.
 
Mar 17, 2002
579
0
0
wow.. not much help I see. If they are locked, why would the bios claim that it is unlocked? You can set it to anything from 6-20. SL9S8 Rev 1.01G with the latest bios
 

krotchy

Golden Member
Mar 29, 2006
1,942
0
76
If I remember correctly, the core 2's were supposed to be locked from having their multiplier moved up and down. Aparently Asus was the first to figure out how to get it to go down, maybe the motherboard lets you pick a multiplier and the chip will comply, only up to its max multiplier. So the motherboard just lets you pick any multiplier in the bios, but it will only actually save a setting that its capible of working with?
 

Shimmishim

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2001
7,504
0
76
have you tried booting up at 10 x 266 for example? or 11 x 266.

this would be a sure fire way of knowing.
 

Maximilian

Lifer
Feb 8, 2004
12,604
15
81
Well looking at the pic, the mobo is referring to you being able to change the multiplier via the bios. Dosent mean the chip is unlocked, my epox 9npa had a similar setting for cpu ratio control, the options were enable or disable, it could easily have been locked or unlocked. Either way the chip wont go above 9. Its just the way the bios had worded it.
 

ScythedBlade

Member
Sep 3, 2006
56
0
0
To that guy about the ASUS comment:

No, Gigabyte was the first one to have it unlocked downwards. Anandtech had falsely (but they fixed it in a revision) said that ASUS was the first to find how to downward multiply it.