• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Unlocked E6600?

Has anyone figured this out yet? I am at my max of 380x9 with stock chipset cooling. Here is a picture of my bios that looks like it can be changed but I cant get it to work.

Link to picture

Edit - WTF? I cant change my profile!! ??
Anyways, here is what I have:

ASUS P5W64 WS Professional
E6600
OCZ EL DDR2 PC2-8000 (2x1GB)
Areca ARC-1280 soon <-
4 x WD 500GB
20 x Maxtor 300GB
More soon
 
Just because the bios shows higher multis doesn't mean your chip can use them 😕

Your E6600 is locked @ 9 or lower like all the others.
 
So you can't punch in 10 instead of 9 for the ratio? Swap the keyboard and try again. 😀 Report back with the exact stepping along with the revision info of the board.
 
If I remember correctly, the core 2's were supposed to be locked from having their multiplier moved up and down. Aparently Asus was the first to figure out how to get it to go down, maybe the motherboard lets you pick a multiplier and the chip will comply, only up to its max multiplier. So the motherboard just lets you pick any multiplier in the bios, but it will only actually save a setting that its capible of working with?
 
Well looking at the pic, the mobo is referring to you being able to change the multiplier via the bios. Dosent mean the chip is unlocked, my epox 9npa had a similar setting for cpu ratio control, the options were enable or disable, it could easily have been locked or unlocked. Either way the chip wont go above 9. Its just the way the bios had worded it.
 
To that guy about the ASUS comment:

No, Gigabyte was the first one to have it unlocked downwards. Anandtech had falsely (but they fixed it in a revision) said that ASUS was the first to find how to downward multiply it.
 
Back
Top