I know people who barely passed basic math yet they create wonderful web pages. Clearly, math is not very important in this case.
And those people are much MUCH closer to graphic designers or graphic artists than computer scientists.
I know people who barely passed basic math yet they create wonderful web pages. Clearly, math is not very important in this case.
Disgusting.
Yes, your ignorance is very much so. Sports subsidizes the rest of the school. Specifically male sports.
Hi, I am the director of the computer science program at a major university.Here is a Professor's page about the event. Interestingly, they had proposed the creation of a College of Computing a few weeks before the Dean proposed the evisceration of the department. http://www.cise.ufl.edu/~davis/
Hi, I am the director of the computer science program at a major university.
Here is a shitty website made in Microsoft Word!
99.999999999% of all professors websites will be like that.
Yes, your ignorance is very much so. Sports subsidizes the rest of the school. Specifically male sports.
Are you trolling? A real CS degree is NOT about creating web pages.
Hi, I am the director of the computer science program at a major university.
Here is a shitty website made in Microsoft Word!
Computer Science is too broad a term. I think it's really bad how colleges have it right now.
It's always more about the money and less about actually TEACHING students something.
Students should specialize in fields they are interested in and spend little time on other topics and concepts. Those should only be used to introduce students to related fields and areas in IT to make them more well rounded people.
As it stands right now, colleges have way too much Mathematics in Computer Science programs. If someone wants to create pages with HTML and CSS, there is no need for them to study Trigonometry and Calculus. It's ridiculous to state otherwise.
I know people who barely passed basic math yet they create wonderful web pages. Clearly, math is not very important in this case.
You got that wrong. CS has more gen ed classes than computer engineering. Comp eng is more diverse thanks to option to pick cs electives and few hardware classes. In today's world where embedded systems are everywhere, there are actually lot of EEs coding them.I would disagree. In the schools around me that have these 3 degrees, they break down like this:
- Computer Engineering - Hardware based. Almost an EE degree, but with a computer (data transfer and storage) focus. This is probably for your hardware designers and/or embedded systems people.
- Information Systems - A "business" degree. Basically a small amount of watered down programming/architecture classes and a bunch of business classes. This is probably for your project managers.
- Computer Science - More of a complete "computer programming" degree. You learn the most about general programming concepts, data structures, algorithm development and analysis, etc. There is really no focus on the business side and a smaller focus on the hardware side.
While I think the CE and CS need to overlap somewhat, I think they are distinct enough to warrant separate degrees. There is a whole lot to learn in both disciplines that probably wouldn't benefit someone working in field specific jobs.
Most of the crap you take in any degree program is to weed the less able students out to make room for those that will make a difference.
Except that's what the majority of graduates are going to be doing.
Horseshit.
complete, and utter horseshit.
Athletic programs subsidize themselves. Research is where the real money come in, for any school.
Hell--look at PSU, one of the 2 or 3 schools where the AD has the "luxury" of pulling in enough revenue to allow itself to exist as a separate entity from the University. Even then, after the AD shares its revenue (which is almost entirely generated by the child rape prog--er, men's football program) amongst the other athletic programs, they return about 10 or 20 million dollars per year, to PSU--A University with a revenue of roughly 4 billion.
This argument that major sports programs bring in real money for any University is an utter lie.
Thanks for addressing the myth of athletic programs bringing in tons of money.