Originally posted by: tweakmm
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Originally posted by: hdeck
i stopped after the 2nd bold sentence.
You saved some time... it's all hogwash.
god????:Q
Please, they're using 1920s research... we know VERY well today how the brain operates, and where certain memories are stored.
what about the other parts of the article?
It's all BS... he's using some facts of science, and spinning his own pseudo science.
What else the superhologram contains is an open-ended question. Allowing, for the sake of argument, that the superhologram is the matrix that has given birth to everything in our universe, at the very least it contains every subatomic particle that has been or will be -- every configuration of matter and energy that is possible, from snowflakes to quasars, from blue whales to gamma rays. It must be seen as a sort of cosmic storehouse of "All That Is."
Um yeah, that's nothing new. Everything in the universe was here since the big bang... nothing has been created since then or destroyed. Matter can be made from energy, and energy can be made from matter... but matter or energy isn't made from nothingness.
For if the concreteness of the world is but a secondary reality and what is "there" is actually a holographic blur of frequencies, and if the brain is also a hologram and only selects some of the frequencies out of this blur and mathematically transforms them into sensory perceptions, what becomes of objective reality? Put quite simply, it ceases to exist. As the religions of the East have long upheld, the material world is Maya, an illusion, and although we may think we are physical beings moving through a physical world, this too is an illusion.
In the above quote... he takes Maya and simply distorts it to his own definition. Maya isn't say the world is an illusion... the world is real. But to our concept of it, it's an illusion. We believe thigns belong to us, but it doesn't... that's an illusion. I just label that that porsche belongs to me, but in the grand scheme of thigns, it doesn't... and labelling it, and striving for it, doesn't bring happiness... if it does, it's an illusion... and will disappear just like an illusion does... it just causes more striving and suffering (because we don't get what we want)... etc etc. It's very metaphysical, and i wont' go into this... but obviously the author of this theory is a moron. He reminds me of a kid i knew in highschool... who's knowledge about the world was vast... but they were all completely superficial. He only knew tidbits here and there, and when he formulates his own ideas, it's all garbage... because they're all his interpretation of stuff, and his interpretation were completely different from what the idea really is.
Notice how he doesn't have any proof to what he says... all he does is use examples that he distorts, and tries to fit it into his theory. Notice how uses analogy to prove his points... analogies are great at helping people understand stuff, but it's not proof or fact. I can use the analogy that the universe is a like a balloon expanding... that the air in the balloon is time... the more air (time) you add, the bigger the balloon is (the bigger the universe is). Now, that helps you understand something, but that's not proof of anything.
Facebook
Twitter