Originally posted by: Martimus
I know I shouldn't feed a troll, and I didn't after your first post, but WHAT THE HELL? I don't believe anyone here thinks that accessing SSD's is faster than accessing system RAM, or any of the various levels of processor cache. I am sorry that my wondering outloud if we could come up with a feasible way to basically obsolete system RAM, how it would change the computing landscape, would upset you so much. It would be nice if mass storage became so fast that we wouldn't need a seperate "fast" system memory for quick access by the processor. It is obviously possible now for small memory sizes, slow processors, or huge budgets; but I was thinking about mainstream use.
Anyway, I was never trying to anger you with my statements; and looking back at them I still wonder how I managed to do that. I hope that you go home and have a few drinks, and just chill out. Life is too difficult to get stressed over how other people view the world. I hope that you feel better soon.
I didn't respond as well for a reason to that final post he made.
I felt that I made a viable effort to use examples to show anything this side of those examples was worthy debate material, he chose to go and pursue examples on the far extreme side of even my examples in some lackluster attempt to invalidate the basic premise of what you and I are both saying - reasonable discussion on what it will take for the bottleneck to no longer be the hard-drive.
Some folks just can't handle engaging in gedanken experiments in a social setting. Clearly, as we wouldn't have mods otherwise. At any rate I am still crazy excited about the prospects of affordable sub-100us latency SSD's in the coming 2-3 yrs. Flash cadence is very robust, we'll see doubling of capacities for same price every 18months for a while yet.
Good news for Samsung and Toshiba, bad news for Seagate.