Unigine Superposition benchmark released

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Pandora's Box

Senior member
Apr 26, 2011
428
151
116
Nut5EPo.png
 

Valantar

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2014
1,792
508
136
What are you talking about? It looks better than any game I've seen, including those that use DX12 and Vulkan. I don't see this being particularly CPU limited anyway.
It's not at all - the highest loads I saw while running this was around 25% across 4 cores and spikes of close to 50% on one - and that's on my ancient Core2Quad. Then again, all that tells us is that this is a poor substitute for an actual game, not using any kind of physics or really making the CPU do anything outside of draw calls and the like.
 

dogen1

Senior member
Oct 14, 2014
739
40
91
It's not at all - the highest loads I saw while running this was around 25% across 4 cores and spikes of close to 50% on one - and that's on my ancient Core2Quad. Then again, all that tells us is that this is a poor substitute for an actual game, not using any kind of physics or really making the CPU do anything outside of draw calls and the like.

Isn't it supposed to just be a gpu bench?
 

lobz

Platinum Member
Feb 10, 2017
2,057
2,856
136
Do you happen to know roughly what percentage of AAA games coming in the next 12 months are Vulkan or DX12 exclusive?
do you happen to know the number of games coming out in the next 12 months that use 1.5 CPU threads, like Unigine 2? ........
 

Valantar

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2014
1,792
508
136
Isn't it supposed to just be a gpu bench?
I'd argue that it isn't: it's a benchmark based on a game engine, not on a 3d rendering platform. A game engine in use in a game stresses the entire system, not just the GPU. As such, the benchmark should as well.
 

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
Adding the executable to an existing profile with SLI bits does enable SLI as it has always done. You could also add the executable under it's own profile and manually input whatever SLI bits. It shows both of my GPUs during the benchmark.

I tried this, the screenshot shows two GPUs but it clearly is using just one.

1bWgvn9.png
 

Red Hawk

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2011
3,266
169
106
What are you talking about? It looks better than any game I've seen, including those that use DX12 and Vulkan. I don't see this being particularly CPU limited anyway.
But what purpose does it fill? There are a ton of DX11/OpenGL benchmarks out there, including several that are Unigine based. So, stress testing? Ensuring your system is functioning properly for DX11 and OpenGL? Tools already exist for that. Want to get an idea how your system will handle future games? Outta luck there, as the future will feature DX12 and Vulkan more and more. You want to look at pretty lighting and geometry? Could've been pushed further if it was designed for DX12/Vulkan from the ground up. This benchmark is redundant at best and obsolete at worst.
 

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
But what purpose does it fill? There are a ton of DX11/OpenGL benchmarks out there, including several that are Unigine based. So, stress testing? Ensuring your system is functioning properly for DX11 and OpenGL? Tools already exist for that. Want to get an idea how your system will handle future games? Outta luck there, as the future will feature DX12 and Vulkan more and more. You want to look at pretty lighting and geometry? Could've been pushed further if it was designed for DX12/Vulkan from the ground up. This benchmark is redundant at best and obsolete at worst.

But it's loaded with physics, a Wimshurst machine, and above all a desktop adding machine with nixie tubes! Pure bliss, I tell you! ;)
 

AdamK47

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,215
2,839
126
I tried this, the screenshot shows two GPUs but it clearly is using just one.

1bWgvn9.png

Did you happen to compare GPU usage. Clearly not.

While SLI DOES WORK it will not scale well due to the existing profiles being used.
 
Last edited:

rancherlee

Senior member
Jul 9, 2000
707
18
81
A lot less CPU bottle neck in this one, running 1080 medium and 1080 Extreme on my 7950 pulled 99%+ GPU through the entire test with my 8320 @ 4.5ghz, previous benchmarks from them only used 1 thread and would drop to 60-70% GPU utilization fairly often on my setup. Running the 720p Low did show a few drops to ~90% on my system and had my CPU to ~29% load so it appears to use at least 2 threads.

Just checked the monitor and it fully loads 1 core and uses ~50% on 2 other cores on my 8320.
 
Last edited:

Valantar

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2014
1,792
508
136
A lot less CPU bottle neck in this one, running 1080 medium and 1080 Extreme on my 7950 pulled 99%+ GPU through the entire test with my 8320 @ 4.5ghz, previous benchmarks from them only used 1 thread and would drop to 60-70% GPU utilization fairly often on my setup. Running the 720p Low did show a few drops to ~90% on my system and had my CPU to ~29% load so it appears to use at least 2 threads.

Just checked the monitor and it fully loads 1 core and uses ~50% on 2 other cores on my 8320.
That's very odd. On my Core2Quad it loads the first core up to (but never above) 50%, and the rest up to 30%. On the other hand, GPU load hovered between 90-100%, some times dropping into the 80s.
 

james1701

Golden Member
Sep 14, 2007
1,873
59
91
33178029583_301c8eff0c_c.jpg


34062561615_91b94c69e0_c.jpg


33220239694_b8e9ebfe70_c.jpg


33906010652_c798bdcd81_c.jpg


R7 1800X 3.9GHZ Sappire Nitro Fury's 1050 500 Driver 17.4.2. Crossfire working now is not too bad.
 

moonbogg

Lifer
Jan 8, 2011
10,635
3,095
136
I figured what the heck. I'll try it.

lgh5ZgK.png


Hey, that's barely 2% slower than the new TitanXp at only a little over half the cost! That's money baby!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZGR