• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Unigine Releases Heaven 2.5 Benchmarking Suite

Got 31.7 FPS, 806 points. Lowest was 7.4 FPS, on a scene transition. Besides that it didn't go below 18 I think.

Default settings, 1920x1080.
 
Does this benchmark still put DRM on your system? No thanks.

Edit: Am I thinking of the Hawx demo instead?
 
Last edited:
😱 Details?

Does this benchmark still put DRM on your system? No thanks.

+ 1
What
DRM in Benchmark program ?
Here is what my HTPC system did
HeavenBenchmarkv25.jpg
 
fps 43.0, score 1083, min frames 11.1, max frames 94.3

1680X1050 res full screen

I7 920@4.0Ghz
XFX 6950HD (unlocked shaders stock speed 800/1250mhz)


fps 46.8, score 1179, min frames 25.3, max frames 103.1 (strange on the min frames...?)

I7 920@4.0Ghz
XFX 6950HD (unlocked shader OC`d to 880/1375mhz basicly a 6970HD)

Same config as above but with 8XAA

fps 32.0, score 806, min frames 10.5, max frames 55.5
 
Last edited:
I say everyone should run it at 1080p (since it's pretty common) with everything maxed. That's how I ran it.

I'd like to see how my 580 at 902mhz compares to other setups.
 
I say everyone should run it at 1080p (since it's pretty common) with everything maxed. That's how I ran it.

I'd like to see how my 580 at 902mhz compares to other setups.


Ok... Just buy me the monitor I need for that and will do...:biggrin:
 
There's no way unless your running dual cards. You got a higher score than my 580 at 902mhz.

Screenshot? I know something is not maxed.
He probably didn't change the tessellation setting. here's mine:


Amd Radeon unlocked and OCed to 950/1300 I am going to push it to 1000/1400 later and see how much more I can get.

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
 
Ran the test 3 times - default, AAx8 AFx16, AAx8 AFx16 extreme tessellation.

u251.jpg
u252.jpg
u253.jpg


I saw a distinct IQ difference between tessellation on normal and extreme. All the rocks (road, houses, natural) and ropes looked a lot better on extreme. Obviously without AA everything looked really bad.
 
Here is mine : Tesselation extreme is a 'killer'


Unigine_2011_03_06_08_06_44_191.png


Default settings ,
no AA
4x Anisotropy
normal tessellation
Unigine_2011_03_06_08_17_49_749.png
 
Last edited:
It won't let me post attachments?
FPS:29.7
Scores:747
Min FPS:15.4
Max FPS:73.7
Hardware

Binary:Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1600 Release Mar 1 2011
Operating system:Windows 7 (build 7600) 64bit
CPU model:Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 760 @ 2.80GHz
CPU flags:4200MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 SSE42 HTT
GPU model:NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 8.17.12.6658 1280Mb
Settings

Render:direct3d11
Mode:1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen
Shaders:high
Textures:high
Filter:trilinear
Anisotropy:16x
Occlusion:enabled
Refraction:enabled
Volumetric:enabled
Tessellation:extreme

sorry, was not 1080 but 1920x1200

I think he ment for you to set tessellation to extreme, Anisotropy 16x, and AA to 8x
 
Last edited:
Rig in my sig (Phenom @ 2.4/3.6GHz, 8GB DDR2, 2 x 5870 Vapor-X @ 875/1250) scored:

FPS: 53.0
Scores: 1336
Min FPS: 9.1
Max FPS: 123.4

Hardware
Binary: Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1600 Release Mar 1 2011
Operating system: Windows Vista (build 6002, Service Pack 2) 64bit
CPU model: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 940 Processor
CPU flags: 3600MHz MMX+ 3DNow!+ SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A HTT
GPU model: ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series 8.14.01.6187 CrossFireX 1024Mb

Settings
Render: direct3d11
Mode: 1920x1200 4xAA fullscreen
Shaders: high
Textures: high
Filter: trilinear
Anisotropy: 16x
Occlusion: enabled
Refraction: enabled
Volumetric: enabled
Tessellation: normal
 
Back
Top