Unigine Releases Heaven 2.5 Benchmarking Suite

Qbah

Diamond Member
Oct 18, 2005
3,754
10
81
Got 31.7 FPS, 806 points. Lowest was 7.4 FPS, on a scene transition. Besides that it didn't go below 18 I think.

Default settings, 1920x1080.
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,571
10,206
126
Does this benchmark still put DRM on your system? No thanks.

Edit: Am I thinking of the Hawx demo instead?
 
Last edited:

Mir96TA

Golden Member
Oct 21, 2002
1,950
37
91

Does this benchmark still put DRM on your system? No thanks.

+ 1
What
DRM in Benchmark program ?
Here is what my HTPC system did
HeavenBenchmarkv25.jpg
 

Bartman39

Elite Member | For Sale/Trade
Jul 4, 2000
8,867
51
91
fps 43.0, score 1083, min frames 11.1, max frames 94.3

1680X1050 res full screen

I7 920@4.0Ghz
XFX 6950HD (unlocked shaders stock speed 800/1250mhz)


fps 46.8, score 1179, min frames 25.3, max frames 103.1 (strange on the min frames...?)

I7 920@4.0Ghz
XFX 6950HD (unlocked shader OC`d to 880/1375mhz basicly a 6970HD)

Same config as above but with 8XAA

fps 32.0, score 806, min frames 10.5, max frames 55.5
 
Last edited:
May 13, 2009
12,333
612
126
I say everyone should run it at 1080p (since it's pretty common) with everything maxed. That's how I ran it.

I'd like to see how my 580 at 902mhz compares to other setups.
 

Bartman39

Elite Member | For Sale/Trade
Jul 4, 2000
8,867
51
91
I say everyone should run it at 1080p (since it's pretty common) with everything maxed. That's how I ran it.

I'd like to see how my 580 at 902mhz compares to other setups.


Ok... Just buy me the monitor I need for that and will do...:biggrin:
 

badb0y

Diamond Member
Feb 22, 2010
4,015
30
91
There's no way unless your running dual cards. You got a higher score than my 580 at 902mhz.

Screenshot? I know something is not maxed.
He probably didn't change the tessellation setting. here's mine:


Amd Radeon unlocked and OCed to 950/1300 I am going to push it to 1000/1400 later and see how much more I can get.

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
 

Qbah

Diamond Member
Oct 18, 2005
3,754
10
81
Ran the test 3 times - default, AAx8 AFx16, AAx8 AFx16 extreme tessellation.

u251.jpg
u252.jpg
u253.jpg


I saw a distinct IQ difference between tessellation on normal and extreme. All the rocks (road, houses, natural) and ropes looked a lot better on extreme. Obviously without AA everything looked really bad.
 

notty22

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2010
3,375
0
0
Here is mine : Tesselation extreme is a 'killer'


Unigine_2011_03_06_08_06_44_191.png


Default settings ,
no AA
4x Anisotropy
normal tessellation
Unigine_2011_03_06_08_17_49_749.png
 
Last edited:

load81

Member
Jan 21, 2011
105
0
0
It won't let me post attachments?
FPS:29.7
Scores:747
Min FPS:15.4
Max FPS:73.7
Hardware

Binary:Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1600 Release Mar 1 2011
Operating system:Windows 7 (build 7600) 64bit
CPU model:Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 760 @ 2.80GHz
CPU flags:4200MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 SSE42 HTT
GPU model:NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 8.17.12.6658 1280Mb
Settings

Render:direct3d11
Mode:1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen
Shaders:high
Textures:high
Filter:trilinear
Anisotropy:16x
Occlusion:enabled
Refraction:enabled
Volumetric:enabled
Tessellation:extreme

sorry, was not 1080 but 1920x1200

I think he ment for you to set tessellation to extreme, Anisotropy 16x, and AA to 8x
 
Last edited:

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,002
126
Rig in my sig (Phenom @ 2.4/3.6GHz, 8GB DDR2, 2 x 5870 Vapor-X @ 875/1250) scored:

FPS: 53.0
Scores: 1336
Min FPS: 9.1
Max FPS: 123.4

Hardware
Binary: Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1600 Release Mar 1 2011
Operating system: Windows Vista (build 6002, Service Pack 2) 64bit
CPU model: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 940 Processor
CPU flags: 3600MHz MMX+ 3DNow!+ SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A HTT
GPU model: ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series 8.14.01.6187 CrossFireX 1024Mb

Settings
Render: direct3d11
Mode: 1920x1200 4xAA fullscreen
Shaders: high
Textures: high
Filter: trilinear
Anisotropy: 16x
Occlusion: enabled
Refraction: enabled
Volumetric: enabled
Tessellation: normal