understanding homosexual

[prodigy]

YOU'RE A HOMO

 

[BAMAVOO]

How can heterosexual men look at a hairy vagina and say "mmm, that looks good". Thgink about it - what if she was on her period and had just urinated. Sounds yummy, doesn't it? It's as equally disgusting as an ass, so you have no argument.

Damn I almost had to agree with you!

 

[jjones]

Originally posted by: prodigy
YOU'RE A HOMO

you forgot the obligatory pic

and here's a fine little ditty:

Jesus loves you, even if you're gay.
You're s'posed to love your neighbor, any old way.
If you're a homo sapiens, you'll be okay,
'Cause Jesus, he loves you, even if you're gay.

In the heart of Texas is a house of the Lord,
Where freedom of worship is more than a word.
They don't go asking, Who do you love?
If you love Jesus, it's more than enough.
'Cause,

Jesus loves you, even if you're gay.
You're s'posed to love your neighbor, any old way.
If you're a homo sapiens, you'll be okay,
'Cause Jesus, he loves you, even if you're gay.

Now some good Baptists want them expelled.
They say gays and lesbians are going to Hell.
So the holy fathers are taking a stand:
They say, You can't be a Christian and love your fellow man.
Well, I say,

Jesus loves you, even if you're gay.
You're s'posed to love your neighbor, any old way.
If you're a homo sapiens, you'll be okay,
'Cause Jesus, he loves you, even if you're gay.

It's an old, old story, but I still think it's odd,
When people are bigots and blame it on God.
It once was black folks who met the same fate.
I say, Jesus loves you, whether you're gay or you're straight.
Let me hear it now,

Jesus loves you, even if you're gay.
You're s'posed to love your neighbor, any old way.
If you're a homo sapiens, you'll be okay,
'Cause Jesus, he loves you, even if you're gay.

 

[tcsenter]

Originally posted by: Fausto1

Originally posted by: boggsie
There have been a couple of studies done, where identical twins were separated at birth and adopted out. In this particular study, the intention was to highlight the fact that genetically identical twins, separated at birth, can exhibit very different behavior and personality disorders. A couple of cases had one twin develop schizophrenia, while the other developed into what would be considered a normal, healthy and productive part of society.

If we ever get to the bottom of this, I believe that it will similarly be revealed, that sexual attraction is something that sociologically and behaviorally develops as a child is being raised.

Actually the twin studies indicated homosexuality had both genetic and social components. ie- being the genetic twin of a gay person doesn't automatically make you gay, but the odds of you being gay are higher than that of a non-related person or even a non-twin sibling.

You're on to something here.

Homosexuality in all likelihood is probably caused by a few different factors. What is true in one case may not be true in all cases. Just like there seems to be multi-factoral or multi-nodal causes of many diseases and illnesses, such as autoimmune diseases or neurological disorders, the evidence suggests there is no one single 'magic bullet' as an underlying cause for homosexuality.

I think part of the problem in this debate is that so many people are trying to find a 'magic bullet', that one 'thing' which causes people to behave in this way, whether by free choice or not by free choice. I predict this will be proven far too simplistic, by some order of magnitude.

There seems to be a link in 'some' homosexuals to a genetic component or disposition while not at all in others. There seems to be a link in 'some' homosexuals to a sociological/psychological component while not at all in others. Just because the end-result is the same, does not mean the underlying cause is identical from one case to the next.

There is no doubt that, for some homosexuals, it is the manifestation of an abnormal sexual perversion no different than having some bizarre or twisted fetish.

If an individual can come to hold such bizarre and warped views as to find intense sexual gratification in human suffering, indeed where they cannot achieve sexual gratification without the presense of human suffering, as in sadomasochists, then I don't find it at all difficult to believe that, during the extremely delicate course of human psychological development, something might go terribly 'wrong' with the end-result being that one might come to find sexual arousal and attraction in the same sex.

There are people who are sexually aroused by animals, high-heel shoes, hats, and children. Serial murderers usually have extremely warped sexual desires and fantasies. These perversions are no more 'legitimate' or 'normal' or 'healthy' simply because 'people do it'.

The excuse that "people do it" has never been any kind of standard for what is or should be 'acceptable' or 'normal' or 'healthy'. There are far more credible and prudent standards by which to judge what is or should be considered 'acceptable' or 'normal' or 'healthy', and homosexuality fails most of them.

Perhaps for some it is not unlike schizophrenia or OCD in that it is not something they can control without neurobiological intervention (drugs) because there is a bona fide defect in the anatomy or neurophysiology of the brain which causes them to find attraction or arousal in the same sex. For others, it is most certainly an issue of abnormal psychology, not unlike the sadomasochist who can only become sexually aroused and stimulated by human suffering.

However, even if it should become accepted or proven that certain people are homosexual because of some abnormal psychological factor, there isn't much hope insofar as treatment. These are people who will be warped their entire life, for the most part, 'treatment' isn't a realistic option. Once the mind gets beyond a certain undefinable thresh-hold stage of abnormal psychological development, there's just no going back, really. I've yet to learn of a 'reformed' sadomasochist or pedophile.

And so we as a society have to decide to what extent we should tolerate this behavior based on how damaging or harmful it may be to society. The sadomasochist probably didn't 'chose' to find sexual gratification in human suffering. Its not like you wake up one morning and think to yourself, "I think I'll masturbate to depictions of human torture and dismemberment today. Always willing to try new things..."

Be that as it may, we don't tolerate sadomasochism openly peddled to our children. We don't give sadomasochism prime-time sitcoms on NBC. Sadomasochists and their perversions are forced to the private confines of the bedroom between consenting adults with like-perversions, where they belong. At the same time, we don't shoot sadomasochists or throw them in prison, either.

Though, one must wonder how those who think its not merely 'acceptable' but 'desirable' that children are being taught to 'accept' homosexuality in their schools would react if it were sadomasochism which their children were being taught to 'accept', or if NBC created a sitcom dedicated to promote 'tolerance' for sadomasochists and put in in their 8:00pm line-up.

I suspect the only ones who would be for that are those who take this 'tolerance' thing to extreme levels of stupidity or sadomasochists themselves.

 

[her209]

You can make yourself gay by taking some medicine to screw up your homone balance.