*Uncensored* video of the wounded Iraqi

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Valvoline6

Senior member
Oct 6, 2000
742
0
0
Originally posted by: cumhail
Originally posted by: Valvoline6
I always call the terrorists terrorists.


Originally posted by: Valvoline6
The bottom line is that the young marine thought the terrorist was faking dead, and was about to do something to harm them all. So he shot him. End of story. One more dead terrorist. :thumbsup:

The terrorists have been faking dead and then shooting and booby trapping bodies. This is what happens when you have a history of doing those things. Seeing the video and hearing first hand accounts I think the marine will be cleared.

And by your estimation, are any and all Iraqis fighting against the US military "terrorists?"

cumhail

All of the remaining fighters are terrorists. And not just because they attack the US troops, but because they shoot, behead, and car bomb Iraqi citizens. Iraqi's who are ready for democracy are terrorized.
 

Aegeon

Golden Member
Nov 2, 2004
1,809
125
106
Originally posted by: Valvoline6
All of the remaining fighters are terrorists. And not just because they attack the US troops, but because they shoot, behead, and car bomb Iraqi citizens. Iraqi's who are ready for democracy are terrorized.
This is a REALLY stupid argument. Not all the Iraqi insurgents are doing the actions you just mentioned. In fact, those staying behind in Falujah are presumably the fighters who do want to engage US troops directly.
 

cumhail

Senior member
Apr 1, 2003
682
0
0
Originally posted by: Valvoline6
Originally posted by: cumhail
Originally posted by: Valvoline6
I always call the terrorists terrorists.


Originally posted by: Valvoline6
The bottom line is that the young marine thought the terrorist was faking dead, and was about to do something to harm them all. So he shot him. End of story. One more dead terrorist. :thumbsup:

The terrorists have been faking dead and then shooting and booby trapping bodies. This is what happens when you have a history of doing those things. Seeing the video and hearing first hand accounts I think the marine will be cleared.

And by your estimation, are any and all Iraqis fighting against the US military "terrorists?"

cumhail

All of the remaining fighters are terrorists. And not just because they attack the US troops, but because they shoot, behead, and car bomb Iraqi citizens. Iraqi's who are ready for democracy are terrorized.

Putting aside your apparent definition of "democracy," and sticking with your definition of "terrorist," you are saying that you believe that every Iraqi insurgent in Falluja is a "terrorist" who is guilty of shooting, beheading, and car bombing Iraqi citizens, and that there is no chance whatsoever that any the people seen in the video in question (nor any of the other insurgent casualties in Falluja, for that matter) were non-terrorist insurgents...

Is that a fair summary of your position?

cumhail

 

Valvoline6

Senior member
Oct 6, 2000
742
0
0
Originally posted by: Aegeon
Originally posted by: Valvoline6
All of the remaining fighters are terrorists. And not just because they attack the US troops, but because they shoot, behead, and car bomb Iraqi citizens. Iraqi's who are ready for democracy are terrorized.
This is a REALLY stupid argument. Not all the Iraqi insurgents are doing the actions you just mentioned. In fact, those staying behind in Falujah are presumably the fighters who do want to engage US troops directly.

You are telling me they are a completely separate group from those that carried out bombings and shootings of Iraqis? Those in Falluja have had nothing to do with those actions? They did not terrorize those within their own city?
 

judasmachine

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2002
8,515
3
81
Summary: Marine wound too tightly from being wounded earlier in the day (or week?) kills unarmed man, and it also shows the shootout from the other day where someone was shot after being wounded. However that second story is unclear as to if the injured insurgent still had his gun. There was a soundbit from a few Marine officers saying they will follow the law on shooting unarmed injured enemy combatants.

Nothing happens after the shooting, they just turn around and walk away, and some of the other wounded plea for their lives. The marines treat these with a bit more respect.
 

bigal40

Senior member
Sep 7, 2004
849
0
0
Originally posted by: Passions
Summary: Marine makes bad judgement and kills a terrorist. Liberal media blows up the situation and most likely marines career is over due to reporters greed.

Agreed. I couldn't put it better myself.
 

cumhail

Senior member
Apr 1, 2003
682
0
0
Originally posted by: Valvoline6
Originally posted by: Aegeon
Originally posted by: Valvoline6
All of the remaining fighters are terrorists. And not just because they attack the US troops, but because they shoot, behead, and car bomb Iraqi citizens. Iraqi's who are ready for democracy are terrorized.
This is a REALLY stupid argument. Not all the Iraqi insurgents are doing the actions you just mentioned. In fact, those staying behind in Falujah are presumably the fighters who do want to engage US troops directly.

You are telling me they are a completely separate group from those that carried out bombings and shootings of Iraqis? Those in Falluja have had nothing to do with those actions? They did not terrorize those within their own city?

And so the Falluja terrorists have completely exterminated and/or displaced any and all of the Falluja non-terrorists, leaving a Falluja population comprised of a 100% terrorist population, thereby making any non-American in Fallujah fair game to do with as we wish, wounded or not, armed or not...

Thanks for clarifying your position,

cumhail
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Reality sets in.

Yet another reason we should not have gone in because this and how many other incidents exactly like it are bound to happen. War sucks, and we entered it lightly. Unfortunately the Iraqis and our soldiers have to live with Bush's bad choices.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Reality sets in.

Yet another reason we should not have gone in because this and how many other incidents exactly like it are bound to happen. War sucks, and we entered it lightly. Unfortunately the Iraqis and our soldiers have to live with Bush's bad choices.
And the same people spouting off in defense of this cold-blooded murderer by saying it's war, think of the context, blah blah blah, are the same ones that denied atrocities occurred in Vietnam as described by Kerry and many others.

Guess this war is unique. :roll:
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Originally posted by: judasmachine
Summary: Marine wound too tightly from being wounded earlier in the day (or week?) kills unarmed man, and it also shows the shootout from the other day where someone was shot after being wounded. However that second story is unclear as to if the injured insurgent still had his gun. There was a soundbit from a few Marine officers saying they will follow the law on shooting unarmed injured enemy combatants.

Nothing happens after the shooting, they just turn around and walk away, and some of the other wounded plea for their lives. The marines treat these with a bit more respect.

Thanks for the description. :thumbsup:
 

bigal40

Senior member
Sep 7, 2004
849
0
0
You know the marines must have had a reason to shoot the on insurgent. Look at the way they treated the rest of the wounded.
 

cumhail

Senior member
Apr 1, 2003
682
0
0
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Reality sets in.

Yet another reason we should not have gone in because this and how many other incidents exactly like it are bound to happen. War sucks, and we entered it lightly. Unfortunately the Iraqis and our soldiers have to live with Bush's bad choices.

What's troubling is how quickly and consistently history begins to repeat itself. I don't know enough about the Falluja situation, at this point, to liken it in any concrete way to My Lai... but what can be likened to it is the refusal of some/many to see any possibility of fault in "our side's" actions and any virtue in our perceived "enemy." The same arguments about were made, then, about VC tactics justifying the massacre that Valvoline and others are so quick to make now.

When Abu Ghraib broke, people of this mentality were quick to blame the prisoners and the stress the poor soldiers were put into by the "refusal to accept democracy;" in Falluja, again it's the fault of all these "terrorists" for this poor soldier's bad judgement call. And in both cases, the media is to blame for letting news of these events get out, just as the media was to blame for overblowing things like My Lai.

Believe it or not, I'm not trying to vilify the US military or anyone else. But we're already starting to see the emergency of an us-vs-them mentality where "them" is anything and anyone that threatens our self-image of impunity and perfection. We ostensibly fought in Vietnam to protect democracy in South Vietnam (we won't even get into that right now), too... and just as all "gooks" got lumped together as being "VC's," and "VC-sympathizers," then, all "ayrabs" are being lumped together as "terrorists" and "terrorist-sympathizers now."

I'll bow out of this one, now, as I am sure that anything I say will fall on a great many deaf ears; but I'll leave with a poem by W.D. Ehrhart, a former US Marine and Vietnam veteran who later became an outspoken critic of the war:

"GUERRILLA WAR,"
by W.D. Ehrhart

It is practically impossible

to tell civilians
from the Vietcong.

Nobody wears uniforms.
They all talk
the same language
(and you couldn't understand them
even if they didn't).

They tape grenades
inside their clothes,
and carry sack charges
in their market baskets.

Even the women fight;
and young boys,
and girls.

It is practically impossible
to tell the civilians
from the Vietcong'

after awhile
you quit trying.
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Originally posted by: bigal40
You know the marines must have had a reason to shoot the on insurgent. Look at the way they treated the rest of the wounded.

That argument seems to go both ways.

1) The troops treated other injured Iraqis well so they probably weren't scared of people acting dead actually being terrorists
2) The troops treated other injured Iraqis well so they probably wanted to treat the other guy well too.

 

KevinH

Diamond Member
Nov 19, 2000
3,110
7
81
Originally posted by: JacobJ
This is what happens in war.

The mindset of soldiers under massive amounts of stress is completely different than any of us who haven't been there can fathom.

The question should not be whether or not the soldier did anything wrong, but whether or not he should have been put in that situation in the first place.

Agreed. I've been stressing this sentiment in several posts .
 

OFFascist

Senior member
Jun 10, 2002
985
0
0
Originally posted by: Passions
Summary: Marine makes bad judgement and kills a terrorist. Liberal media blows up the situation and most likely marines career is over due to reporters greed.

I agree with your assessment.

 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Originally posted by: OFFascist
Originally posted by: Passions
Summary: Marine makes bad judgement and kills a terrorist. Liberal media blows up the situation and most likely marines career is over due to reporters greed.

I agree with your assessment.


This coming from a fascist. Also, what kind of crappy description is that. The video does not show the liberal media blowing up the situation due to greed. Try and distinguish between objective and subjective.
 

KevinH

Diamond Member
Nov 19, 2000
3,110
7
81
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Reality sets in.

Yet another reason we should not have gone in because this and how many other incidents exactly like it are bound to happen. War sucks, and we entered it lightly. Unfortunately the Iraqis and our soldiers have to live with Bush's bad choices.
And the same people spouting off in defense of this cold-blooded murderer by saying it's war, think of the context, blah blah blah, are the same ones that denied atrocities occurred in Vietnam as described by Kerry and many others.

Guess this war is unique. :roll:

Uh, okay. As a Vietnamese man, I can't tell you how utterly moronic that generalization is. It's blatantly obvious how stupid that is. The soldier deserves his share of the blame for lack of judgement but the lion's share of the blame goes to this stupid administration for having started this war and putting them in hell for no reason JUST LIKE VIETNAM. Are you that dense to make that quantum leap of logic?

 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
This certainly looks to me like murder, and a war crime to boot. I've worked as a military defense attorney, and IMO there's simply no way the USMC can let this go - this guy can and should be taken to a General Court-Martial. The insurgent was wounded, unarmed, and posed no threat to the Marine. Combat stress is not a defense to the crime of murder, though it will be relevant in sentencing if he's convicted.

Frankly I imagine this kind of shooting is common, but it's not legally excusable.

I fail to see how the "liberal media" have anything to do with this being newsworthy - the Marine was the one who elected to shoot an unarmed, wounded opponent with a video camera running. His military career is probably not paramount among his worries at this point, because with or without the media, he'd still be looking at spending the rest of his life in prison.
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
This certainly looks to me like murder, and a war crime to boot. I've worked as a military defense attorney, and IMO there's simply no way the USMC can let this go - this guy can and should be taken to a General Court-Martial. The insurgent was wounded, unarmed, and posed no threat to the Marine. Combat stress is not a defense to the crime of murder, though it will be relevant in sentencing if he's convicted.

Frankly I imagine this kind of shooting is common, but it's not legally excusable.

*Me weighs an attorney's opinion and Passion's opinion... * hmmmmm.... Tough call.

 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: KevinH
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Reality sets in.

Yet another reason we should not have gone in because this and how many other incidents exactly like it are bound to happen. War sucks, and we entered it lightly. Unfortunately the Iraqis and our soldiers have to live with Bush's bad choices.
And the same people spouting off in defense of this cold-blooded murderer by saying it's war, think of the context, blah blah blah, are the same ones that denied atrocities occurred in Vietnam as described by Kerry and many others.

Guess this war is unique. :roll:

Uh, okay. As a Vietnamese man, I can't tell you how utterly moronic that generalization is. It's blatantly obvious how stupid that is. The soldier deserves his share of the blame for lack of judgement but the lion's share of the blame goes to this stupid administration for having started this war and putting them in hell for no reason JUST LIKE VIETNAM. Are you that dense to make that quantum leap of logic?
I think you're agreeing with me.
 

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
This certainly looks to me like murder, and a war crime to boot. I've worked as a military defense attorney, and IMO there's simply no way the USMC can let this go - this guy can and should be taken to a General Court-Martial. The insurgent was wounded, unarmed, and posed no threat to the Marine. Combat stress is not a defense to the crime of murder, though it will be relevant in sentencing if he's convicted.

Frankly I imagine this kind of shooting is common, but it's not legally excusable.

I fail to see how the "liberal media" have anything to do with this being newsworthy - the Marine was the one who elected to shoot an unarmed, wounded opponent with a video camera running. His military career is probably not paramount among his worries at this point, because with or without the media, he'd still be looking at spending the rest of his life in prison.

DonVito, how can you say with certainty that at the time of the shooting the enemy combatant posed no threat?

Do you think that he should spend the rest of his life in jail?
 

GoPackGo

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2003
6,519
595
126
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: Valvoline6
"You can't trust these people. "
Yup, winning the hearts and mind and bringing democracy..
:roll:

They're supposed to be fighting "these people."

The only thing we want from the hearts and minds of an insurgent is a dead heart and mind.

When the enemy pulls their tricks they leave us no option.

Shooting them is the right thing to do when in doubt.
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Originally posted by: GoPackGo
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: Valvoline6
"You can't trust these people. "
Yup, winning the hearts and mind and bringing democracy..
:roll:

They're supposed to be fighting "these people."

The only thing we want from the hearts and minds of an insurgent is a dead heart and mind.

When the enemy pulls their tricks they leave us no option.

Shooting them is the right thing to do when in doubt.

Hmmm... back in the Cheney thread people were saying it's not right to wish death on anyone. And these people are iraqis. Rememember, the guys you're supposed to liberate?
 

GoPackGo

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2003
6,519
595
126
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: GoPackGo
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: Valvoline6
"You can't trust these people. "
Yup, winning the hearts and mind and bringing democracy..
:roll:

They're supposed to be fighting "these people."

The only thing we want from the hearts and minds of an insurgent is a dead heart and mind.

When the enemy pulls their tricks they leave us no option.

Shooting them is the right thing to do when in doubt.

Hmmm... back in the Cheney thread people were saying it's not right to wish death on anyone. And these people are iraqis. Rememember, the guys you're supposed to liberate?

We are in a war. How would you have reacted to the things that happened during World War II?

Since these insurgents aren't following any rules, our soldiers have to improvise, overcome and adapt.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: DonVito
This certainly looks to me like murder, and a war crime to boot. I've worked as a military defense attorney, and IMO there's simply no way the USMC can let this go - this guy can and should be taken to a General Court-Martial. The insurgent was wounded, unarmed, and posed no threat to the Marine. Combat stress is not a defense to the crime of murder, though it will be relevant in sentencing if he's convicted.

Frankly I imagine this kind of shooting is common, but it's not legally excusable.

I fail to see how the "liberal media" have anything to do with this being newsworthy - the Marine was the one who elected to shoot an unarmed, wounded opponent with a video camera running. His military career is probably not paramount among his worries at this point, because with or without the media, he'd still be looking at spending the rest of his life in prison.

DonVito, how can you say with certainty that at the time of the shooting the enemy combatant posed no threat?

Do you think that he should spend the rest of his life in jail?
Next time you watch the video, open your eyes.