Originally posted by: ivwshane
I'm going to say it again, it's impossible to compare carriers unless the circumstances are the same, as in comparing one carriers service in one area to another carriers service in that same area.
Originally posted by: Wiseguy69
Originally posted by: ivwshane
I'm going to say it again, it's impossible to compare carriers unless the circumstances are the same, as in comparing one carriers service in one area to another carriers service in that same area.
Actually, I disagree... based on what an AT&T service person told me. When I called to complain that my phone lost a signal and could not pick one back up, she explained that I needed to turn my phone off and on again to "recycle" the little mini computer in the phone. It actually worked. Something about GSM phones grabbing a tower and holding onto it even if you leave its area.
Anyway, to the point. When I asked why my coverage was so bad, she explained that with TDMA, all carriers can use each others towers. So you may have an AT&T phone in Cleveland, but use a Verizon tower if the signal is stronger. That doesn't happen with GSM. Each carrier has its own towers and none have reached agreements (or are not allowed to by the FCC) so you are at the mercy of your carrier. When I asked what the hell the benefit of GSM was, she told me that I can take my phone all over the world. Whoopee... I haven't left the country in 8 years and have no plans to so in the future. Oh, I can use a camera on my phone too!... that's why I have a digital camera. GSM sucks.
Originally posted by: icecreamman11
It is FREE NATIONWIDE ROAMING like I said...if you don't believe me i''ll e-mail you thepromo.
GSM in general, not just AT&T GSM service, sucks in the united states. It works great in europe and asia, which probably means it'll be as good in the states in the future. I've had Pac Bell/Cingular GSM service for almost 7 years before i just switched and AT&T is better than Cingular, at least in my area.
Originally posted by: vortix
Well....seems like there's a lot of AT&T bashers in here. In my experience, I have had excellent coverage, and very rarely (if ever) drop calls. It is much better than SprintPCS and T-Mobile in my own experience. I'm located in Cleveland, OH, but travel all over the country for work and have never had a problem at all with GSM service. I would recommend it highly over any provider.
You got fed a huge pile of BS!!
Actually, my Sprint service was OK. AT&T has been better, though (I did drop a few calls here and there with Sprint, but rarely do with AT&T). My worst experience was with T-Mobile. Some areas would get decent reception, but others would be complete dead zones. I could not use it at school or my apartment at all. I actually cancelled within one week because of the problems I had with T-Mobile.Originally posted by: Solema
Vortix, I'm surprised that you had a bad experience with Sprint in Cleveland. I live and work in Cleveland and also travel around the country and never have a problem. My entire family and most of my friends converted to Sprint after time when my phone would be the only one that got a signal at gatherings. My boss has AT&T and is switching to Sprint because he drops the call practically every time we talk. Of course I have no idea if he is on GSM or TDMA, so that could be why.
Originally posted by: serialb
AFAIK this a local plan that means you have to pay for roaming (in California market, at least). I wouldn't get AT&T GSM even it's $5/mo as they still have a long way to go in terms of coverage.
Like the other thread mention, T-mobile is offering the exact same thing for the same price. Plus, their TMO's GPRS service has a more reasonable pricing. Even AT&T uses the 850 band, the coverage can't even come close to what TMO is offering across the US.
Originally posted by: FunkmasterT
Originally posted by: serialb
AFAIK this a local plan that means you have to pay for roaming (in California market, at least). I wouldn't get AT&T GSM even it's $5/mo as they still have a long way to go in terms of coverage.
Like the other thread mention, T-mobile is offering the exact same thing for the same price. Plus, their TMO's GPRS service has a more reasonable pricing. Even AT&T uses the 850 band, the coverage can't even come close to what TMO is offering across the US.
Tmo does NOT have a similar plan for the same cost. Their current 1000 anytime for 40/mo doesn't include any offpeak. Plus, AFAIK, Tmo's offpeak means "WEEKENDS ONLY" not NIGHTS & WEEKENDS. Big difference.
I wonder if we could just put in a SoCal zip and get this deal off their site. Most state's large cities are free digital roaming areas, so technically, u don't have to reside in SoCal to take advantage of this offer.
Anyone see any holes in this? Let's hear it.