ULTRA QUICK: WHICH IS BETTER!!

Rand

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
11,071
1
81
2D visual quality, and Multi-Monitor usage the G400 Max is considerably better.
Pretty much anything else including gaming and the GF2 Ultra will blow it away.
 

sirsleepsalot

Senior member
Sep 26, 2001
228
0
0
The G400 is a card from the same time period as the TNT2 and would perform similarly to it. The TNT2 Ultra would be a little faster... I think that pretty much says everything...
 

Bovinicus

Diamond Member
Aug 8, 2001
3,145
0
0
The G400 is just terrible for 3D gaming. If you do a lot of online reading, then the G400's crisp 2D quality will leave you wanting more. However, it's 3D performance will leave you gibbed.
 

Booster

Diamond Member
May 4, 2002
4,380
0
0
Don't get either one, they're both a little old. The best all-purpose cards righ now are Radeons 9000, I've seen 64MB models on sale for about $60.
 

NokiaDude

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 2002
3,966
0
0
Thanks, I bought the Matrox G400 MAX on impulse. Right now I'm getting a refund: he hasn't shipped yet. This is really going to look bad if he gives me an eval.
 

spanky

Lifer
Jun 19, 2001
25,716
4
81
Originally posted by: NokiaDude
Thanks, I bought the Matrox G400 MAX on impulse. Right now I'm getting a refund: he hasn't shipped yet. This is really going to look bad if he gives me an eval.

it's still great for 2d (office apps & net surfing). i mean... if u have a little bro/sis, or another family member that doesn't care about gaming (not sure about dvd)... the matrox will still suffice.