OK, what lies do I believe?
I will not take a knife to a gunfight. Actually, I won't attend a gunfight if I can avoid it. That works for a lot of people. TBH, I tend to not favor movies that pander to the public's gun obsessions. Pick your poisons.
Naturally it is my opinion that you believe lies, that you take as fact things that are not true. What I was referring to here is the notion the that the answer to violence is some form of substitute sublimation, like boxing where the crowd waits in anticipation to witness one or another form of brain damage infliction on another, all in good fun, naturally, and maybe with a few bets on the side. I think that most people, you included, I can be wrong, believe that violence is a natural state and as such must always be with us. Ignore that example if you wish. It was just suggested to me on Netflix that I might want to watch such a contest when I forget to breathe watching a match and which tells me I obviously get pulled in against my better sense.
The ease with which confusion arises, the belief that violence is human nature and needs safety valves to be bled off I believe comes from the obvious fact that the law of the jungle applied to our progenitors for millions of years and is in us to this day. We are built for fight or flight when our lives are threatened. To avoid danger, as you wish to do is a natural strategy and the wish to eliminate guns makes sense when you are not under imminent threat. I believe that thinking that way would all fly out the window if you had a gun and the only way you would survive the next few minutes would be to use it in self defense. There is nothing violent, in my opinion about killing rather than being killed when that is the only way to survive and the assailant isn't threatened first by you. It may be even be less violent that instances where flight where many may be trampled to death.
The point I am trying to make is that the survival instinct allows people to use force to survive, if it be of the legs or of tooth and claw. It is instinctive, morally sanctioned religiously and makes perfect sense. It is the root on which the notion of just war is founded.
Real violence, in my opinion requires imaginary grievance and justification. It requires thought and imagination, self justification, ego, all manifestations of mental illness. It is a prerequisite for triggering our natural instinct for defense by creating imaginary threat. Once you talk yourself into the idea your life is in danger say from liberals, it then become justifiable to kill them, to use self defense violently as there is no real threat.
Try to imagine the Buddha or Jesus going on a shoot spree at the local high school. To me the idea is absurd. Those to and so many others have pulled out violence by the root. They exist on a level of conscious awareness beyond thought and belief, beyond the capacity to conjure up evils they need to kill for their own imagined well being. I believe such people are real and that in them violence is not a feeling they can express. Of course, you are free to believe as you wish.
I believe that violence is learned by being exposed to it as a child and being told and believing you deserved what you got and then denying it out of shame. What is the lack of shame but the inability to admit to guilt you are actually innocent of and all of the suppressed rage being made to feel guilty which actual innocence brings. We were psychically murdered as children and some of us had it bad enough we cross a line that must not be crossed and seek some innocent to vicariously relive the guilt. The murdered child is within us, is us, and he's mad as hell.
Thank the stars that's not me.... I'm Gods little innocent lamb. Right?, Right? Do I need a Kiritsuke? So many things to have. I don't have a dedicated boning knife either or any single side bevel blades or a cleaver. But then, I need a new kitchen too.
May still need work bu I am trying to tell you something I don't think you are willing to believe.