uh oh, here come the pakistanis

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

mastertech01

Moderator Emeritus Elite Member
Nov 13, 1999
11,875
282
126
Two things to consider... they have to make it to a safe refuge from Pakistan and also it took US Forces, primarily Air Force, to kill 100000 Iraqi heavily armed troops 3 days to accomplish that mission.
 

Tripleshot

Elite Member
Jan 29, 2000
7,218
1
0
Lets see, how many royal guardsmen did Iraq loose in the gulf war when the B52's let fall thier lethal cluster bombs? If pakistani's want to go against thier country and its leader, let them. We can handle it.

Remember,the Taliban is mostly Pakistani extract. And many Taliban Afghans had a month to cross the border to avoid our intial assult. Well,if they want to come out and fight,we can ablige them, from 36,000 feet.;)
 

Pocatello

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
9,754
2
76
I'll bet the Pakistani president is relieved. Why, these people are making a lot of trouble at home, instead of a big crack down by the Pakistani government, which will look bad. Let the American kill them instead. You get rid of the trouble makers without getting your hands dirty.
 

Tripleshot

Elite Member
Jan 29, 2000
7,218
1
0
Pocatello
Good point. That had eluded me for the moment. There is some politcal considerations too.

As I understand, the air base inthe southern part of Pakistan is suurounded by some of these pro Taliban Mofos and have shot at our choppers. That won't last long before Puff breaths fire and brimstone on them.;)
 

mastertech01

Moderator Emeritus Elite Member
Nov 13, 1999
11,875
282
126
Thats been known for a long time. We even tried to buy them back and they refused.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Ah yes, the old, "Hey, it's something to get pissed off about." reason. These Pakistanis are poor, hungry, and probably persecuted by their government, and that anger is being directed at a conventient target, the US. And that is the problem we will face in that region as a whole. It's not that the groups their hate us so much, it's that many of them are just looking for an outlet for their anger that has been developing for a long, long time, since way before the US was even a gleam in our founding fathers' eyes.
 

bigdog1218

Golden Member
Mar 7, 2001
1,674
2
0
this is probably old news, but i just heard on msnbc that we hit our second red cross station yesterday, so this is what billions of dollars of technology gets you, dead red cross volunteers, i hope those 200 billion dollars worth of planes can tell the difference between terrorists and innocent people, oh wait they can't, i mean these planes we have now aren't really doing a good job of killing terrorists, we've probably killed more red cross volunteers than terrorists linked to bin laden so far
 

edjam

Golden Member
May 3, 2001
1,196
0
0
British SAS and SBS are the best Spec Ops in the world, I'm sorry but it's true.
 

mastertech01

Moderator Emeritus Elite Member
Nov 13, 1999
11,875
282
126


<< Tthis is probably old news, but i just heard on msnbc that we hit our second red cross station yesterday, so this is what billions of dollars of technology gets you, dead red cross volunteers, i hope those 200 billion dollars worth of planes can tell the difference between terrorists and innocent people, oh wait they can't, i mean these planes we have now aren't really doing a good job of killing terrorists, we've probably killed more red cross volunteers than terrorists linked to bin laden so far ext >>



The planes dont hit the targets, the munitions do, and if you expect perfection you are never going to get it. We can do more with our current munitions than ever before. In prior wars carpet bombing was the only way. It just not a perfect world. You get what you have to work with. Its not entirely the US fault that the Taliban have to hide in amoungst the innocent to create human shields for thier defenses.
 

MrHelpful

Banned
Apr 16, 2001
2,712
0
0


<< we've probably killed more red cross volunteers than terrorists linked to bin laden so far >>


Are you a member of the ACLU?
 

Magicthyse

Golden Member
Aug 15, 2001
1,095
0
0
the Special Forces have hardly failed. Please list all the times they 'screw up.'

Gulf War
Somalia
Vietnam
Iran
etc, etc...

N.B. "Special Forces" include British Special Forces as well in the Gulf War scenario.

Being honest, it's rarely the Forces themselves - who are, as you well know, superbly trained - who make the fatal error. It is usually their intelligence, or lack of it. However, the fact that they screw up becomes their problem, not the intel people's.

Who knows - I may be 'fvcking retarded', however by that token you've had a total lobotomy. An informed opinion is more than mindlessly waving the flag and a gun.
 

yoda291

Diamond Member
Aug 11, 2001
5,079
0
0


<< An informed opinion is more than mindlessly waving the flag and a gun. >>



DAmmit..I keep forgetting to bring a flag to these things. :)
 

LethalWolfe

Diamond Member
Apr 14, 2001
3,679
0
0


<< the Special Forces have hardly failed. Please list all the times they 'screw up.'

Gulf War
Somalia
Vietnam
Iran
etc, etc...

N.B. "Special Forces" include British Special Forces as well in the Gulf War scenario.

Being honest, it's rarely the Forces themselves - who are, as you well know, superbly trained - who make the fatal error. It is usually their intelligence, or lack of it. However, the fact that they screw up becomes their problem, not the intel people's.

Who knows - I may be 'fvcking retarded', however by that token you've had a total lobotomy. An informed opinion is more than mindlessly waving the flag and a gun.
>>




I think we hear much more about the Spec Ops that go wrong, then the ones that go right.


Lethal
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
If we bombed the red cross 1 time, it probably was an accident. But since we bombed the red cross again, I am sure it was planned.

They can run, but they cant hide.
 

Magicthyse

Golden Member
Aug 15, 2001
1,095
0
0
I think we hear much more about the Spec Ops that go wrong, then the ones that go right.

I'm not sure - especially given that the phrase 'military intelligence' is frequently an oxymoron... I think what they should do is to occasionally send the S-2 out on the missions themselves. That'd shake up the quality of the intel, huh? :D
 

CocaCola5

Golden Member
Jan 5, 2001
1,599
0
0
Panama was also a Special Force debacle. These guys don't have reinforcement on the ground like regular troops so they can be vulnerble.
 

Antoneo

Diamond Member
May 25, 2001
3,911
0
0


<< the Special Forces have hardly failed. Please list all the times they 'screw up.'

Gulf War
Somalia
Vietnam
Iran
etc, etc...

N.B. "Special Forces" include British Special Forces as well in the Gulf War scenario.

Being honest, it's rarely the Forces themselves - who are, as you well know, superbly trained - who make the fatal error. It is usually their intelligence, or lack of it. However, the fact that they screw up becomes their problem, not the intel people's.

Who knows - I may be 'fvcking retarded', however by that token you've had a total lobotomy. An informed opinion is more than mindlessly waving the flag and a gun.
>>


The Studies and Observations Group (SOG) of the United States during the Vietnam war was highly successful, rescuing many soldiers from the Northern Vietnamese.
 

erikiksaz

Diamond Member
Nov 3, 1999
5,486
0
76
I must have heard it somewhere, but i also think that we seldom ever hear of Spec Ops accomplishing anything, unless they fail. it might have been either cnn or msn, i don't remember.