Ugh.

Poof

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2000
4,305
0
0
From a recent thread today (an exchange between Eric Korpela and Michael Sinatra - a UCB network admin) on alt.sci.seti here:

From: Michael Sinatra (michael@rancid.berkeley.edu)
Subject: Re: Heh Eric Korpela - pipes not full???
Newsgroups: sci.astro.seti, alt.sci.seti
View this article only
Date: 2002-02-21 09:11:39 PST

On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Eric J. Korpela wrote:

> In article <Pine.GSO.4.44.0202202248300.23650-100000@rancid.berkeley.edu>,
> Michael Sinatra <michael@rancid.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> The problem is that we are bandwidth limited to the rest of the world,
> and connection limited overall. The low rate we're getting to the rest
> of the world (15 Mb/s or less most of the time), and the server limit
> of 1500 active connections combine to make connections difficult regardless
> of where you connect from. All 1500 connections are continuously in use
> pumping out data a low rate to the rest of the world leaving no local
> high-speed connections available.

Right, I just thought about that. Even I2 folks are competing for the
limited number of connections.

I think we may have fixed a transient problem that was limiting bandwidth
unnecessarily; you'll note that the SSL outbound traffic hit 36 mb/s last
night. (You had been hovering around 15-20 mb/s before.)

michael

-------
What this is basically confirming is not only is the bandwidth limited, but the number of simultaenous connections are being limited to 1500 at a time. No wonder we can't get connected. :|



 

JimMc

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,305
0
0
I suppose increased use of high speed team Q's would help in this regard (1500 connections), huh? A connection is a connection, whether it is someone with a 28k modem or a fast DSL line. Having untold thousands of individuals connecting to UCB can't be as efficient as team Q's filling up and dumping, then the individuals can go gnaw on the team Q's. Perhaps Berkeley could deicate some bandwidth to large team Q's after hours to ween some of the individual traffic off their servers.
 

MoFunk

Diamond Member
Dec 6, 2000
4,058
0
0
I am getting a bad feeling about the whole Seti issue. I hope they get this fixed and not just let it slip away.
 

Baldy18

Diamond Member
Oct 30, 2000
5,038
0
0
That confirms the suspicion posted in an earlier thread that the increased bandwidth last night meant that something minor had been fixed.
 

Eponymous

Golden Member
Jun 7, 2001
1,186
0
0
*sigh*

Even with that fix I got hardly anything upload or downloaded last night. :eek:

Maybe tonight. I have about one more days worth of stuff before I have to get inventive.

 

Logix

Diamond Member
Jul 26, 2001
3,627
0
0
I'm happy Berkeley's providing any bandwidth to the Seti@Home project. The school is donating thousands of dollars of bandwidth to Seti as it is.

I'm sure things will be sorted out one way or another in the not too distant future.