nobody has to get into punching range. The MMA fighter will dictate the range with kicks against a boxer. And any MMA fighter watching tapes and planning how to fight floyd would kick the shit out of him - literally.
As for your men are better then women thing - ok. I'm not even arguing that. In fact I've never even thought about it before because its a weird thing to fixate on.
Well, my point is that it IS a stupid thing to fixate on, yet millions of people seem to be doing just that with Rousey vs Floyd. I merely pointed out that there is just too huge a physical mismatch and provided examples. Probably a bit over-the-top, but everything I posted is true, and anyone who is honest knows it.
As far as the Rousey vs Floyd...again, why is it that HE has to get into the Octagon? If she's so keen to fight him, do a charity boxing match. She is the one, after all, who keeps calling him out. Let's be honest: She wants no part of him in reality. She (and UFC, too) is simply using his name to build hers up.
It's kind of like the Rousey vs Cyborg thing....she won't put on weight (which would be easy for her to do) to fight Cyborg and is insisting Cyborg cut weight to come down to her...because Cyborg is A) a legitimate threat, and B) challenging her.
But somehow, that doesn't work for her vs Floyd. She doesn't want to box him, but all the comparisons are in the Octagon. Why is that? Because she is in the same place in this comparison as Cyborg is when compared to Rousey. The one trying to build up her name.
She'd get smoked in the ring. No chance, whatsoever. However, Floyd DOES have at least some chance in the Octagon, because he's faster, quicker, and stronger. He COULD win there. Might not, but he COULD. But he would win 100/100 times in the ring boxing.
Facebook
Twitter