- Jun 24, 2004
- 15,628
- 5
- 81
People might be discussing it in other threads, but I think this deserves its own.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/...0184.html?hpid=topnews
Henry Paulson has gone back on his previous position opposing such a move and will now be partially nationalizing several banks. This is likely an answer to Europe's similar moves over the past week.
So, what do you think? Personally, it sounds like a good idea to me. It'll hurt Republicans who have been pressing for less regulation, and it'll especially anger those in the Republican base who can't stand the idea of nationalizing anything, least of all our big financial institutions, but it seems like the only way to get some real oversight.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/...0184.html?hpid=topnews
Henry Paulson has gone back on his previous position opposing such a move and will now be partially nationalizing several banks. This is likely an answer to Europe's similar moves over the past week.
So, what do you think? Personally, it sounds like a good idea to me. It'll hurt Republicans who have been pressing for less regulation, and it'll especially anger those in the Republican base who can't stand the idea of nationalizing anything, least of all our big financial institutions, but it seems like the only way to get some real oversight.