Originally posted by: flexy
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: flexy
Originally posted by: Tates
My problem is that I don't think we should be there in the first place. The fact that they are f*cking up is icing on the cake. I'm sure it will give Bush an oppurtunity to put more of our soldiers in harms way for the defense of America.
You're against the war. Fair enough.
The war is 8 days old. The troops are 350 miles deep into Iraq, the coalition controls 40% of a county the size of California, there is an established Nothern and Southern front, the Coalition owns the Skys, there are less than 35 Coalition KIA's vs. 25,000+ Iraqi KIA's....
How are they f*cking up?:disgust:
The war is 8 days old....and...although noone admits it, there are voices heard now talking about wrong strategies, underestimation of the iraqi guerila fighters, the weather seems to be a problem, and there are (for sure) not enough soldiers there to 'win' the war. Why do you think they want to stock up their contingent to 250.000 (double it) ???? This does NOT look like careful planning to me, sorry to say that !!!!!!!
And now they have logistics problems after only 8 days into the war....
Get serious...
Yet another clueless person.
Yes, i know.
I am also brainwashed by the ultra left semi-communist news coverage on foxnews, cnn and msnbc
So, they do NOT have logistics problems, 90.000 soldiers are enough and (of course) they all knew about the guerilla attacks/suicide bombings of the iraqis in advance...
And..Red Dawn, i KNOW that things have not even begun to get tough (yet)......how long are they fighting now for this 5000 souls town Nasiryah ? Like 4 days ? Do they already have control over Umm Quasr ? Still some partisans left shooting from windows there? What will be if our troops are fighting for control in Baghdad ?
I mean, that's some concers which (imho) are totally legitimate !!!