• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

U.S. Marines in Fallujah turn to diplomacy

Beowulf

Golden Member
U.S. Marines in Fallujah turn to diplomacy
After fierce battle, military tries to build trust, cement gains

The Associated Press
Updated: 2:41 a.m. ET Nov. 23, 2004


FALLUJAH, Iraq - ?Imagine it?s your mother!? an Iraqi man shouts, demanding the Marine open a bridge north of Fallujah so an ailing woman can get medical treatment.

Capt. Alex Henegar winces but handles the complaint, using the type of on-the-fly diplomacy Marine officers believe can assuage angry Iraqis and draw them in to support the rebuilding of the city, devastated by the recent U.S. assault.

With rebels largely routed, Marines hope insurgent intimidation campaigns will be curtailed and that U.S. forces will be able to forge new relationships with Iraqis and pour development funds into the city to cement military gains.

?This leaves us ahead. It?s hard to imagine, I know, because of the destruction. But things had been backsliding for months,? says Henegar, a civil affairs officer attached to 3rd Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment.

?This has allowed us to start over. We no longer have a haven of dark chaos in the heart of Iraq. In some cases, we need to break things down in order to start over,? said the 30-year old from Lookout Mountain, Ga., ? a recent graduate of Georgetown University?s School of Foreign Service. ?Security is a necessary condition for everything else.?

At the scene at the bridge, Henegar promised the crowd that if it allowed the first post-assault humanitarian shipment to pass unimpeded, he would ask his superiors for permission to open the bridge permanently.

The Iraqi crowd nodded until an Army soldier angered by mortar fire coming from the ailing woman?s village shouted at the interpreter: ?Tell them as long as they?re shooting at us, the bridge stays closed!?

?Whether they articulate it or not, everyone has a theory about what works? said Henegar, who was able to get the woman to medical care.



Reconstruction begins
Marines say the restive Sunni Triangle, including Fallujah, is a particularly nettlesome environment for the development projects meant to win over Iraq?s people.

Following an aborted Marine attack in April, rebels took over the city, which the U.S. military says became a locus for the bombings, ambushes and kidnappings plaguing the country.

Now, with dead bodies scattered over a devastated city nearly devoid of its 250,000 civilians, U.S. forces are turning to reconstruction efforts ahead of elections scheduled January 30.

Any success in calming the insurgency around Fallujah could be used as a model elsewhere in the country, they hope.

?If this (Fallujah) is a success story, then the message will be to get rid of the terrorists militarily and you?re back on track,? says civil affairs Lt. Col. Leonard De Francisci.

The U.S. forces plan to refurbish Fallujah?s electrical grid and water-treatment facility, clear its roads of rubble and inspect buildings for structural soundness ? and at least one military estimate says civilians won?t return until February.

Together, the Iraqi government and U.S. military have set aside $178 million for immediate repairs.

Further out, there is $1.2 billion in long-stalled funds earmarked for Anbar province, part of the $18.4 billion in U.S. taxpayer funds that Congress approved for rebuilding Iraq.

Officers say rebels intimidated many Fallujah residents, taking over homes and executing those who resist ? stymieing U.S. efforts to spend money on people in and around the city.

?No amount of money I could have paid them would have allayed their fears,? said Henegar. ?The insurgents would simply say ?we?ll cut off your head.? What?s more compelling??


Grisly tasks build trust
In an initial, post-attack trust-building exercise, Henegar arranged with a local imam to have men from a nearby village help in removing the bodies of the estimated 1,200 insurgents killed in Fallujah since the Marine-led assault began Nov. 8.

The Marines hope the grisly task can establish relationships with local Iraqis needed as partners in reconstruction ? and turn up leaders to help in the effort.

?The very first, most basic thing is engagement, building relationships. But the challenge is picking the right people with whom to engage. We really can?t just reach down and pick leaders,? says Henegar.

In the area near Fallujah, the entrenched leaders are often local sheiks, whose thicket of tribal and political affiliations aren?t greatly understood by Marines.

One sheik helping in the body-collection effort, who gave his name to reporters as Abdul Hamid, smiles and joked with the Marines. But when they?re not listening, he calls them the ?Jew Americans.?


The sheik denies to reporters that rebels ever had any presence in Fallujah, saying the Marines massacred only civilians.

?You can leave the city in the control of the sheiks and Iraqis,? he tells the Marines, ?because they are able men that people listen to and follow.?

Marine civil affairs leaders say they?re hoping to skirt politics in the short term, turning instead to people with established skills in running a metropolitan area.

?I?m going to look for a technocratic leadership, to administer the city and keep it running. I want to take the politics out of it,? says De Francisci.

De Francisci, 39, from Melbourne, Fla., says Fallujah may not immediately have a thriving American-style democracy.

?What you?re going to see is not Jeffersonian democracy, but probably some religious-style democracy,? he said. ?Not like you?d see in America, more like early Roman democracy. It won?t be one person, one vote ? more caucuses.?

© 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6564063/

Hopefully this little bit goes along way for our friends overseas.
 
Anyone remember how diplomacy worked before? Certainly the Bush administration didn't.

From a previous thread up here
Intent on winning over the town's 80,000 residents, Ryan initially went to neighborhood councils and offered millions of dollars in improvement projects. But he insisted no rebuilding could begin until the attacks stopped. The council members just shrugged their shoulders and blamed the violence on outsiders.

In the first week of April, violence came to a head. For five days, April 3-7, Ryan's 400 soldiers fought pitched battles with militants using Abrams tanks and Bradley fighting vehicles. No Americans died, but hundreds of Iraqis did and much of the town was damaged.

The battalion took control of Abu Ghraib, but it was the worst kind of occupation, Ryan said. There was a curfew and checkpoints. Soldiers searched every vehicle and person entering. No one liked it.

But Ryan also was learning about Iraqi culture. While the councils had political power, he realized he needed the help of tribal and religious leaders to ease tensions.

"When I met with this one sheik, from the Tamimi tribe, he told me I was the first coalition official to ever talk to him," Ryan recalled.

At another meeting, Ryan was offering cash for a construction project when "one guy said to me, 'We don't want your money, we want your respect.' That stuck with me."

On May 1, Ryan called a meeting of all the tribal and religious sheiks. The first two hours saw a relentless tongue-lashing from the sheiks, a litany of perceived injustices by American troops. Ryan said it was hard to take at times.

"The White Page Truce"

"They are frustrated and if the idea is to diffuse their frustrations, that means letting them put those frustrations on the table," he said. Then for six hours, Ryan did some things U.S. officers say is "outside the box." First, he told the sheiks both sides had made mistakes.

"Just saying we've made mistakes - we've been afraid to say it because people will blow it out of proportion - makes a huge difference," Ryan said. "? Their faces light up and they are ready to talk."

Then he offered a clean slate, or as they say in Arabic, a white page. If the sheiks took responsibility for security, Ryan told them, he promised that his soldiers would not raid their homes. Further, he said, if the sheiks promised that members of their tribes sought by U.S. forces would stop carrying out attacks, the troops would stop hunting them.

All the sheiks agreed, and the deal has become known as "The White Page Truce."

Called best move yet

"This is the best move the Americans have made yet," said Sheik Sadi al-Khinani, a tribal leader. "The people will see that the Americans have come here to help them, not what others have said, which is that the Americans have come here to abuse them."

Ryan said that in the six weeks after March 1, 28 U.S. soldiers were wounded and two killed. In the six weeks since the truce, there hasn't been a single U.S. casualty. "Part of the challenge here is that we've targeted the other side as criminals instead of combatants," Ryan said, explaining that he wanted a cease-fire, not trials. "In two months, we threw 107 people in jail and it didn't change the number of attacks. I haven't thrown anyone in jail for six weeks and attacks are down 50 percent."
 
Heh and you think you got the solution to dipolmacy.I don't but you prefer the news of our troops killing ppl to further your agenda against the administration which is good I guess because we are all entitled to opinions.Better late than never though they still need to calm some hotbeds of insurgents to bring stability.
 
Originally posted by: Beowulf
Heh and you think you got the solution to dipolmacy.I don't but you prefer the news of our troops killing ppl to further your agenda against the administration which is good I guess because we are all entitled to opinions.Better late than never though they still need to calm some hotbeds of insurgents to bring stability.
Looks like Lt. Col. Ryan had a good solution, doesn't it? Killing the civilians won't do any good. Showing them we are an occupying force and not there as liberators won't do any good.

Mindsets like yours will keep the fighting going on for years and years.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Beowulf
Heh and you think you got the solution to dipolmacy.I don't but you prefer the news of our troops killing ppl to further your agenda against the administration which is good I guess because we are all entitled to opinions.Better late than never though they still need to calm some hotbeds of insurgents to bring stability.
Looks like Lt. Col. Ryan had a good solution, doesn't it? Killing the civilians won't do any good. Showing them we are an occupying force and not there as liberators won't do any good.

Mindsets like yours will keep the fighting going on for years and years.

Don't you have the squash the ppl who regularly do attacks against civilians and soldiers in order to bring stability? Mindset of making peace with the enemy will never work it will lead to more killings so just kill thy enemy and establish security and let Iraqi's vote.
 
It's not making peace with the enemy. It's engaging the civilians and the city leaders to take part in their own security.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
It's not making peace with the enemy. It's engaging the civilians and the city leaders to take part in their own security.

Iraqi Cleric: The Terrorists Should Target the Americans, Not the Iraqis

The following are excerpts from an interview with Iraqi cleric Muhammad Makkawi Al-Dahalaki:

Sheik Muhammad Makawi Al-Dahalaki: A resistance that fights occupation is a (legitimate) resistance. This is an honorable resistance. As for the person who comes? I say to any person who wants to blow himself up, wants to kill, and wants to blow up a car: On the highways, on the main roads there are American military convoys. Let him carry out the explosions there. Why does he go to the police stations? Why does he go to the schools? Why does he go near hospitals? These people and even the police are our countrymen, who want to earn a living and prevent theft and, indeed, they've reduced the rate of theft. Despite the corruption in the police, theft had declined. So why do the police and the National Gourd serve as a target? Why doesn't he target the US? His resistance should always target the US.

http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=310

Hrm an Iraqi cleric like this man seems to agree that the fighters are terrorist but even he says why kill the Iraqi's.I don't think the insurgents are civilians they could have been but when you pick up a gun your a combatant and the US won't tolerate it.I do agree with making peace but not everyone wants to be peaceful its a hard task but our brave soldiers and generals are trying.
 
Back
Top