Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Specific arguments?
People often question my desire to segregate based on gender...but I just think during puberty it would be wise. Kids would concentrate on studying more than sex!
Hehe you reply fast. I made a quick edit.
Ok, let me try my best to break it down.
1) Segregate schools by gender from 6th through 10th grades. (Kids would be in mixed gender classes from K-5th and 11-12th grades.)
There is much to learn about life in general which greatly involves situations as an adult where sexes are mixed. School is partially in place to prepare one to gradually become an adult. Therefore, this would do more harm than good. If school only existed for academic purposes then I would agree with this but it doesn't.
2) Mandatory national uniform requirement (proven to calm kids down).
Sure. So many are already doing this anyways and it seems to work.
3) Really drug-free schools (no more Ritalin, etc).
There are too many students in the school system which really do need this stuff. They are separated from the regular students but that is about as good as you are going to get.
4) Segregate high schools by ability (like in Germany). The smart kids would be grouped in a college preparatory track while the less intelligent kids would go to vocational schools, leading to apprenticeships, and finally certification.
Promotes elitism too much. Kids need to learn that the world contains a large array of different people. Some people are better at academics than others. That doesn't mean they are better people in general though. Experience by being exposed to diversity to a degree is a very valuable part of the school system.
5) Some sort of national HOPE Scholarship program. Kids that have a 3.0 GPA or higher go to public college/university without tuition. They would have to maintain a 3.0 or better to maintain scholarship.
I'm all for this.
6) School funding: no longer funded by local property taxes. All school funding would have to made more equal somehow.
Somehow?
7) Upon graduation, students would have to spend their "19th" year abroad doing humanitarian/Peace Corps work abroad (outside the USA).
Could be pretty cool, but it would be very expensive. The juice might not be worth the squeeze. I'm not sure.
8) Pay teachers a lot more...like $80K or more, but... 1) Teacher's Union goes bye bye, 2) Never be a convicted Sex Offender, 3) Receive a bonus if you worked in the "business" world for at least five years before becoming a teacher, 4) Receive pay increases based on student performance of The Exit Exam.
1 and 2 yes. 3 and 4 no. Students who do not desire to learn cannot be taught. Teachers should not be punished for such things and nor should they be tempted to work around the system lowering true quality so that they are not punished. The business world thing doesn't make sense because schools are there too teach kids a lot more than what can be applied to the business world. They are not only there to prepare kids for a job in other words. That is just a one slice of the pie. Providing bonuses would make it seem like that is the biggest part of that pie and it really isn't.
9) The Exit Exam = A series of 4 exams, each 3-4 hours in length, both oral and written, testing student skills on the 4 subjects of their choice. Each exam would contain elements pertaining to both state and federal education standards. This test would be both a high school exit and college entrance exam, thus replacing the SAT/ACT.
Perhaps. I like the sound of it but I would have to see some example tests as well as some results by having students take the tests as an experiment. It's worth trying though.
10) Kill ETS (Electronic Testing Services).
Why?
11) Depending on the number of students who pass The Exit Exam, teachers receive a promotion (or demotion).
I already covered this one above. This is an awful idea to try and improve quality.
12) Eliminate day care services at school. Sex/Drug education would be provided at the 6th and 9th grades. Condoms and birth control pills provided for free from 9th grade onwards.
I don't like the eliminate daycare thing but the rest is fine. Girls do not see that the day cares are available and think to themselves that it is not so bad if they have a kid. Before this service existed, we still had plenty of pregnant teens so there no reason to believe that taking the service away will eliminate that issue or even reduce it. The difference is that we also had more of them drop out in the past than we do now. Let's keep them in school. If not for there sake, then for the child's sake.
13) All students would have to memorize The Constitution/Bill of Rights AND know how to 1) Balance a Checkbook, 2) Understand credit/credit cards and how they work, and 3) Know how to complete a 1040 form without help. (The latter of course exposing them to the evils of taxation.)
I guess there is nothing wrong with this. With a limited number of funds I might place this lower down the totem poll but that doesn't mean it is a bad idea.