U.S. Dogs need food in IRAQ

[Mo0o]

Originally posted by: 0roo0roo

Originally posted by: Mo0o

Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
theres no point donating. its this administrations sh*t. they have to deal with it themselves unless you feel like covernig their asses and just promoting more of this incompetence and the suffering it causes.

So you're going to let the dogs suffer for the administration's mistakes?

thats how it is.. its their fault. its their f*cking up thats the cause. covering their asses only lets them off the hook, covers the problem, probably leading to worse. this admin needs to face the consequences, ugly as they are, it is by their hand.

That's so fvcking stupid. That's like saying, "hey let's not get children into foster homes if the irresponsible parents can't feed and care for them properly, it's the damn responsibility of the parents!"

:disgust:

 

[Mill]

Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
theres no point donating. its this administrations sh*t. they have to deal with it themselves unless you feel like covernig their asses and just promoting more of this incompetence and the suffering it causes.

Way to be a bastard. :disgust:

 

[0roo0roo]

Originally posted by: Mo0o

Originally posted by: 0roo0roo

Originally posted by: Mo0o

Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
theres no point donating. its this administrations sh*t. they have to deal with it themselves unless you feel like covernig their asses and just promoting more of this incompetence and the suffering it causes.

So you're going to let the dogs suffer for the administration's mistakes?

thats how it is.. its their fault. its their f*cking up thats the cause. covering their asses only lets them off the hook, covers the problem, probably leading to worse. this admin needs to face the consequences, ugly as they are, it is by their hand.

That's so fvcking stupid. That's like saying, "hey let's not get children into foster homes if the irresponsible parents can't feed and care for them properly, it's the damn responsibility of the parents!"

:disgust:

we are NOT the foster homes for the government.

Way to be a bastard.

nice way it works out. i'm the bastard, the admin gets to slide.

 

[pyonir]

U.S. Homeless need food in U.S.A.

 

[Mill]

Originally posted by: 0roo0roo

Originally posted by: Mo0o

Originally posted by: 0roo0roo

Originally posted by: Mo0o

Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
theres no point donating. its this administrations sh*t. they have to deal with it themselves unless you feel like covernig their asses and just promoting more of this incompetence and the suffering it causes.

So you're going to let the dogs suffer for the administration's mistakes?

thats how it is.. its their fault. its their f*cking up thats the cause. covering their asses only lets them off the hook, covers the problem, probably leading to worse. this admin needs to face the consequences, ugly as they are, it is by their hand.

That's so fvcking stupid. That's like saying, "hey let's not get children into foster homes if the irresponsible parents can't feed and care for them properly, it's the damn responsibility of the parents!"

:disgust:

we are NOT the foster homes for the government.

Way to be a bastard.

nice way it works out. i'm the bastard, the admin gets to slide.

It has nothing to do with George W. or this admin you penis. I care about the dogs.

 

[Babbles]

My understanding after reading the article is that those are the Iraqi dogs, not US military dogs whom are starving. Not that it makes it any more humane, however I can understand why the budget and resources that the troops in the field are allocated does not include food for the non-US military dogs.

In Baghdad, military spokesman Staff Sgt. Don Dees said the care of Iraqi police dogs was separate from U.S. military working dogs, which he said were well-fed.

"Each dog handler deploys with their dog and 180 days of rations," Dees said of U.S. canine teams. "The MPs tell me sometimes the dogs eat better than the handlers."

 

[tarheelmm]

Because we have to send $350 Million on the tsunami victims.........

More important things then our own soliders......

Originally posted by: rh71
curious too... why can't the US spend just a few thousand from its millions+ budget on cans of dog food ? 😕

 

[Howard]

Originally posted by: rh71
curious too... why can't the US spend just a few thousand from its millions+ budget on cans of dog food ? 😕

Canned dog food would be less practical than the equivalently-nutritious dry food.

 

[0roo0roo]

Originally posted by: tarheelmm
Because we have to send $350 Million on the tsunami victims.........

More important things then our own soliders......

Originally posted by: rh71
curious too... why can't the US spend just a few thousand from its millions+ budget on cans of dog food ? 😕

well no, the tax cut for the wealthy is more important than our soldiers.

 

[trmiv]

This has turned from a thread about starving dogs into a P&N thread. RUN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Eli]

WTF?

With all the money we're spending over there, we can't contract up with like Purina or something and buy a few tons of dogfood?

/head explodes

It'd be great PR for whatever company helped out.