• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

U.S. Abortion Rate Falls to Lowest Level in Decades

techs

Lifer
http://news.yahoo.com/s/hsn/20...tolowestlevelindecades

U.S. Abortion Rate Falls to Lowest Level in Decades By Kathleen Doheny
HealthDay Reporter
28 minutes ago



THURSDAY, Jan. 17 (HealthDay News) -- The U.S. abortion rate has reached its lowest level in three decades, according to a new report released Thursday.


"We don't know why," said study author Rachel Jones, senior research associate at the Guttmacher Institute, a nonprofit group that focuses on reproductive issues. The findings will be published in the March issue of the institute's journal, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health.


The actual number of abortions dropped to a new low, with 1.2 million abortions in 2005, compared to a high of 1.6 million abortions in 1990.


The report does not include an analysis of why the levels have continued to decline. "We don't regard [the findings] as good or bad," Jones said. "It's a descriptive study."


The abortion rate for 2005 was 19.4 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15 to 44. In comparison, the rate was 29.3 abortions per 1,000 women in 1981, 21.3 abortions per 1,000 women in 2000, and 19.7 abortions per 1,000 women in 2004.


To arrive at their findings, Jones and her team contacted all known abortion providers in the United States and also used U.S. Census Bureau data to look at national and state trends.


Among the trends they uncovered was an increase in medical abortions between 2000 and 2005. "A majority of providers offer both RU-486 [medical abortion] as well as surgical," Jones said. "The number offering just RU-486 went up."


Jones and her team found that 57 percent of all known abortion providers now offer such abortion services, compared with 33 percent in early 2001. Medical abortions accounted for 13 percent, or 161,000, of all abortions done in 2005, she reported.


More than six of 10 abortions were performed within the first eight weeks, the researchers reported. And almost three of 10 were done at six weeks or before.


Jones' team also found that the average cost of an abortion at 10 weeks was $413, about $11 less than in 2001 when inflation is taken into account.


The number of providers in 2005 was 1,787, 2 percent fewer than in 2000.


The findings triggered mixed reactions.


"This study shows that prevention works, and that's what we provide in our health centers every day," Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood, said in a statement. "Planned Parenthood knows from daily experience that the best way to continue the downward trend is with policies that expand access to health care and real information. At the end of the day, Americans of all stripes believe that we need to do more to prevent unintended pregnancy and make health care affordable and accessible."


While the study didn't include an analysis of why the rate is declining, Janice Crouse, director of The Beverly LaHaye Institute at Concerned Women for America, a conservative public policy organization, said one reason could be a decline in abortions among teen girls.


That drop, she added, is partially explained by the success of abstinence programs. "Abortion definitely has gone down, particularly among young people," Crouse said.


"We'd like to take a look at the dynamics [behind the statistics]," said Jones, adding that Guttmacher plans to look more closely at the use of RU-486 in future research.




Basically if anti-abortion activists really want to prevent abortions they should be pushing for free condoms and free birth control pills.
 
Originally posted by: techs
Basically if anti-abortion activists really want to prevent abortions they should be pushing for free condoms and free birth control pills.

Would you be in favor of mandatory ultrasounds prior to the abortion procedure? Because this has also shown to be highly effective in preventing abortions.
 
Originally posted by: hellokeith
Originally posted by: techs
Basically if anti-abortion activists really want to prevent abortions they should be pushing for free condoms and free birth control pills.

Would you be in favor of mandatory ultrasounds prior to the abortion procedure? Because this has also shown to be highly effective in preventing abortions.

Sure, so long as the woman is also forced to watch a mandatory short film that features the changes pregnancy will bring on her body, the actual birthing experience which I hear is a hoot, a dissertation on the state of orphanages and foster care in this country, and 10 minutes of a baby screaming.
 
Originally posted by: hellokeith
Originally posted by: techs
Basically if anti-abortion activists really want to prevent abortions they should be pushing for free condoms and free birth control pills.

Would you be in favor of mandatory ultrasounds prior to the abortion procedure? Because this has also shown to be highly effective in preventing abortions.

No. Why would I? I don't care about abortions.
I am just pointing out that its hypocritical of anti-abortion people to be against condoms and covering birth control meds by health insurance.

 
Originally posted by: techs
Originally posted by: hellokeith
Originally posted by: techs
Basically if anti-abortion activists really want to prevent abortions they should be pushing for free condoms and free birth control pills.

Would you be in favor of mandatory ultrasounds prior to the abortion procedure? Because this has also shown to be highly effective in preventing abortions.

No. Why would I? I don't care about abortions.
I am just pointing out that its hypocritical of anti-abortion people to be against condoms and covering birth control meds by health insurance.

I'm not against birth control of any kind. Kill as many sperm or eggs as you wish, matters little to me. But if you get pregnant, it's your fault, because you trusted a system with a known failure rate. That's my beef. Birth control systems encourage people to have sex, because it lulls them into believing they can't get pregnant, and that's a lie.

I'd like to know more about this study. For one thing, they say abortions have decreased. Good. But I'd like to know the ratio of abortions to total amount of pregnancies. Abortions may have gone down by total amount, but have they gone down as a percentage against the number of pregnancies? For instance, say in 2005 there were 100 total pregnancies, and 50 abortions. Then in 2006 there were 70 total pregnancies, and 45 abortions. The number of abortions have decreased, yes, but the amount of pregnancies ending in abortions have increased, which is contradictory to the intent of the study.

I'm not saying this is the case. I'm saying it's an important fact that is left out of the study.

Not to mention, this is the Guttmacher Institute. They were founded, and are funded by Planned Parenthood, so I can't help but suspect their findings might be biased.
 
Originally posted by: Atreus21
I'm not against birth control of any kind. Kill as many sperm or eggs as you wish, matters little to me. But if you get pregnant, it's your fault, because you trusted a system with a known failure rate. That's my beef. Birth control systems encourage people to have sex, because it lulls them into believing they can't get pregnant, and that's a lie.

When will you people stop peddling this tripe? Birth control encourages sex? SEX encourages SEX, coupled with a teenagers raging hormones or everyone elses natural instincts toward procreation, and the fact that it's pleasurably addictive when available.

You self-contradict yourself within 2 sentences. Birth control is a lie because it "lulls people into thinking they can't get pregnant", but has a "known failure rate." Do you see the problem with that logic?
 
Sure, so long as the woman is also forced to watch a mandatory short film that features the changes pregnancy will bring on her body, the actual birthing experience which I hear is a hoot, a dissertation on the state of orphanages and foster care in this country, and 10 minutes of a baby screaming.
Can we also show the expecting mother a mandatory short film of an actual abortion procedure, to include imagery of what remains of the "meaningless growth of tissue" in "her body."

In essence, you are suggesting that a woman could arguably grow to regret seeing an unwanted pregnancy to term based on the realities of raising a child...I would counter that some women who choose to have abortions similarly live to regret that decision.

Abortion is a horrid reality of modern medicine, but the Pandora's box is already open...so I agree that the best road to limiting abortions is to educate and help individuals made informed and responsible decisions...and that includes accessible birth control.
 
How about we lock up pregnant women so they can't get abortions and prevent them from smoking or taking any drugs and make them eat good food and study all day long on how to be a good mother. We need to get seriously pro-life. Men will have to be tested and developed too and those that don't cut it sterilized.
 
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
How about we lock up pregnant women so they can't get abortions and prevent them from smoking or taking any drugs and make them eat good food and study all day long on how to be a good mother. We need to get seriously pro-life. Men will have to be tested and developed too and those that don't cut it sterilized.

I?ve a better idea. We can treat abortion as a contraceptive and have government pay for it. Pay for the deaths of over a million babies every year. About the number of immigrants we need to fill the gap in our work force. Hey, we need them to teach us another language anyway right?

Think of all the money saved though, not having to buy condoms or birth control pills! Who wants to use those anyways?
 
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: hellokeith
Originally posted by: techs
Basically if anti-abortion activists really want to prevent abortions they should be pushing for free condoms and free birth control pills.

Would you be in favor of mandatory ultrasounds prior to the abortion procedure? Because this has also shown to be highly effective in preventing abortions.

Sure, so long as the woman is also forced to watch a mandatory short film that features the changes pregnancy will bring on her body, the actual birthing experience which I hear is a hoot, a dissertation on the state of orphanages and foster care in this country, and 10 minutes of a baby screaming.


:laugh: :thumbsup:
 
Third world mentality, have all the kids you want and don?t worry about the consequences. At least birth control is easy to get here.

Unwanted child ending up in foster care, $1,700+cothing costs+free medical for foster parent for every single one per month.
 
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: Atreus21
I'm not against birth control of any kind. Kill as many sperm or eggs as you wish, matters little to me. But if you get pregnant, it's your fault, because you trusted a system with a known failure rate. That's my beef. Birth control systems encourage people to have sex, because it lulls them into believing they can't get pregnant, and that's a lie.

When will you people stop peddling this tripe? Birth control encourages sex? SEX encourages SEX, coupled with a teenagers raging hormones or everyone elses natural instincts toward procreation, and the fact that it's pleasurably addictive when available.

You self-contradict yourself within 2 sentences. Birth control is a lie because it "lulls people into thinking they can't get pregnant", but has a "known failure rate." Do you see the problem with that logic?

Having sex is a choice. Part of being human is having some modicum of self-control. We aren't held responsible for things beyond our control. Because having sex requires a choice (excluding cases of rape), it is within our control, and therefore we are responsible for the choice we made if pregnancy results.

Everone's instinct toward procreation? No. Everyone's instinct towards sex, and summarily preventing procreation out of the desire NOT to procreate.

There is exactly one 100% effective method of birth control, and that is abstinence. If you don't want to get pregnant, hence, the best way not to do so is not to have sex. If you choose another method that you know to be 99.5% effective, you knowingly take a risk, and therefore assume responsibility for the consequences if it turns out you chose wrongly. If one chooses to gamble, they knowingly subject themselves to the consequences of losing money if they lose the game.

 
Originally posted by: Atreus21
There is exactly one 100% effective method of birth control, and that is abstinence.

Yeah? Tell that to her.

Originally posted by: Atreus21
If one chooses to gamble, they knowingly subject themselves to the consequences of losing money if they lose the game.

I think a better example is getting car insurance. You drive around knowing you're not 100% safe, you still could get in an accident, could still get injured. So you buy insurance for your car, and for your medical expenses. You don't not drive, you drive as safe as you can, and know that if shit goes wrong, there's a fix. That's what abortion is.

Yeah, sex is usually a choice, but when you've had a few drinks, and are fooling around, accidents happen. Asshat puritans can say, you made the mistake, you live with it, but there's plenty of evidence that pro-lifers are just as quick to procure abotions as the rest of us. http://mypage.direct.ca/w/writer/anti-tales.html
 
Originally posted by: Atreus21
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: Atreus21
I'm not against birth control of any kind. Kill as many sperm or eggs as you wish, matters little to me. But if you get pregnant, it's your fault, because you trusted a system with a known failure rate. That's my beef. Birth control systems encourage people to have sex, because it lulls them into believing they can't get pregnant, and that's a lie.

When will you people stop peddling this tripe? Birth control encourages sex? SEX encourages SEX, coupled with a teenagers raging hormones or everyone elses natural instincts toward procreation, and the fact that it's pleasurably addictive when available.

You self-contradict yourself within 2 sentences. Birth control is a lie because it "lulls people into thinking they can't get pregnant", but has a "known failure rate." Do you see the problem with that logic?

Having sex is a choice. Part of being human is having some modicum of self-control. We aren't held responsible for things beyond our control. Because having sex requires a choice (excluding cases of rape), it is within our control, and therefore we are responsible for the choice we made if pregnancy results.

Everone's instinct toward procreation? No. Everyone's instinct towards sex, and summarily preventing procreation out of the desire NOT to procreate.

There is exactly one 100% effective method of birth control, and that is abstinence. If you don't want to get pregnant, hence, the best way not to do so is not to have sex. If you choose another method that you know to be 99.5% effective, you knowingly take a risk, and therefore assume responsibility for the consequences if it turns out you chose wrongly. If one chooses to gamble, they knowingly subject themselves to the consequences of losing money if they lose the game.

I think you just want the people having the fun you're not to pay, no?
 
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: Atreus21
There is exactly one 100% effective method of birth control, and that is abstinence.

Yeah? Tell that to her.

In situations not involving miracles or acts of God, there is exactly one 100% effective method of birth control, and that is abstinence.
 
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Atreus21
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: Atreus21
I'm not against birth control of any kind. Kill as many sperm or eggs as you wish, matters little to me. But if you get pregnant, it's your fault, because you trusted a system with a known failure rate. That's my beef. Birth control systems encourage people to have sex, because it lulls them into believing they can't get pregnant, and that's a lie.

When will you people stop peddling this tripe? Birth control encourages sex? SEX encourages SEX, coupled with a teenagers raging hormones or everyone elses natural instincts toward procreation, and the fact that it's pleasurably addictive when available.

You self-contradict yourself within 2 sentences. Birth control is a lie because it "lulls people into thinking they can't get pregnant", but has a "known failure rate." Do you see the problem with that logic?

Having sex is a choice. Part of being human is having some modicum of self-control. We aren't held responsible for things beyond our control. Because having sex requires a choice (excluding cases of rape), it is within our control, and therefore we are responsible for the choice we made if pregnancy results.

Everone's instinct toward procreation? No. Everyone's instinct towards sex, and summarily preventing procreation out of the desire NOT to procreate.

There is exactly one 100% effective method of birth control, and that is abstinence. If you don't want to get pregnant, hence, the best way not to do so is not to have sex. If you choose another method that you know to be 99.5% effective, you knowingly take a risk, and therefore assume responsibility for the consequences if it turns out you chose wrongly. If one chooses to gamble, they knowingly subject themselves to the consequences of losing money if they lose the game.

I think you just want the people having the fun you're not to pay, no?

I have an asian girlfriend. You bet your ass I'm having fun.

However, I subject myself to taking responsibility for the risk I'm taking. If she were to get pregnant, we've already agreed an abortion is out of the question.
 
Originally posted by: Atreus21
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: Atreus21
There is exactly one 100% effective method of birth control, and that is abstinence.

Yeah? Tell that to her.

In situations not involving miracles or acts of God, there is exactly one 100% effective method of birth control, and that is abstinence.

What if you jack off into a tissue, and embarrased, put it back in the box. A chaste woman uses the bathroom and seeing no toilet paper, grabs the used tissue and wipe wipe. Oops, preggers.
 
Originally posted by: Atreus21
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Atreus21
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: Atreus21
I'm not against birth control of any kind. Kill as many sperm or eggs as you wish, matters little to me. But if you get pregnant, it's your fault, because you trusted a system with a known failure rate. That's my beef. Birth control systems encourage people to have sex, because it lulls them into believing they can't get pregnant, and that's a lie.

When will you people stop peddling this tripe? Birth control encourages sex? SEX encourages SEX, coupled with a teenagers raging hormones or everyone elses natural instincts toward procreation, and the fact that it's pleasurably addictive when available.

You self-contradict yourself within 2 sentences. Birth control is a lie because it "lulls people into thinking they can't get pregnant", but has a "known failure rate." Do you see the problem with that logic?

Having sex is a choice. Part of being human is having some modicum of self-control. We aren't held responsible for things beyond our control. Because having sex requires a choice (excluding cases of rape), it is within our control, and therefore we are responsible for the choice we made if pregnancy results.

Everone's instinct toward procreation? No. Everyone's instinct towards sex, and summarily preventing procreation out of the desire NOT to procreate.

There is exactly one 100% effective method of birth control, and that is abstinence. If you don't want to get pregnant, hence, the best way not to do so is not to have sex. If you choose another method that you know to be 99.5% effective, you knowingly take a risk, and therefore assume responsibility for the consequences if it turns out you chose wrongly. If one chooses to gamble, they knowingly subject themselves to the consequences of losing money if they lose the game.

I think you just want the people having the fun you're not to pay, no?

I have an asian girlfriend. You bet your ass I'm having fun.

However, I subject myself to taking responsibility for the risk I'm taking. If she were to get pregnant, we've already agreed an abortion is out of the question.

Lots of people say that, but then change their mind when it actually happens. Not saying you would do that, but it happens all the time.

 
Originally posted by: jjanders
Originally posted by: Atreus21
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Atreus21
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: Atreus21
I'm not against birth control of any kind. Kill as many sperm or eggs as you wish, matters little to me. But if you get pregnant, it's your fault, because you trusted a system with a known failure rate. That's my beef. Birth control systems encourage people to have sex, because it lulls them into believing they can't get pregnant, and that's a lie.

When will you people stop peddling this tripe? Birth control encourages sex? SEX encourages SEX, coupled with a teenagers raging hormones or everyone elses natural instincts toward procreation, and the fact that it's pleasurably addictive when available.

You self-contradict yourself within 2 sentences. Birth control is a lie because it "lulls people into thinking they can't get pregnant", but has a "known failure rate." Do you see the problem with that logic?

Having sex is a choice. Part of being human is having some modicum of self-control. We aren't held responsible for things beyond our control. Because having sex requires a choice (excluding cases of rape), it is within our control, and therefore we are responsible for the choice we made if pregnancy results.

Everone's instinct toward procreation? No. Everyone's instinct towards sex, and summarily preventing procreation out of the desire NOT to procreate.

There is exactly one 100% effective method of birth control, and that is abstinence. If you don't want to get pregnant, hence, the best way not to do so is not to have sex. If you choose another method that you know to be 99.5% effective, you knowingly take a risk, and therefore assume responsibility for the consequences if it turns out you chose wrongly. If one chooses to gamble, they knowingly subject themselves to the consequences of losing money if they lose the game.

I think you just want the people having the fun you're not to pay, no?

I have an asian girlfriend. You bet your ass I'm having fun.

However, I subject myself to taking responsibility for the risk I'm taking. If she were to get pregnant, we've already agreed an abortion is out of the question.

Lots of people say that, but then change their mind when it actually happens. Not saying you would do that, but it happens all the time.

And I see why they do, having had pregnancy scares myself. It's a life-changing possibility, and taking the easy way out is quite tempting. It'd be nice to be able to erase it and pretend it didn't happen. But that's grossly negligent.

I've wrestled with it, and I know the feeling. But I'm resolute. I couldn't live with myself if I killed my own child for sheer convenience.
 
Originally posted by: Atreus21
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: Atreus21
There is exactly one 100% effective method of birth control, and that is abstinence.

Yeah? Tell that to her.

In situations not involving miracles or acts of God, there is exactly one 100% effective method of birth control, and that is abstinence.

Come on now! Don't cherry pick your data! And tell that to the Komodo Dragon.
 
Originally posted by: sirjonk

Sure, so long as the woman is also forced to watch a mandatory short film that features the changes pregnancy will bring on her body, the actual birthing experience which I hear is a hoot, a dissertation on the state of orphanages and foster care in this country, and 10 minutes of a baby screaming.

The video should also include a talk about the economic realities of raising an infant that one can't afford to take care of, the costs of daycare, the difficulty of going to college while being a single mother, the joys of working manual labor low-wage jobs for life, the damage it inflicts on unwilling fathers, the increased risk that poor children raised by single mothers will end up in jail, etc. Also, the video should include a discussion about how having children you cannot afford to take care of drags the rest of the community down by either increasing taxes or sucking up public funds (for welfare, health care, and education).

 
Originally posted by: Atreus21 Birth control systems encourage people to have sex, because it lulls them into believing they can't get pregnant, and that's a lie.

...and that's a problem because? Flying spaghetti monster says don't have sex outside of marriage and don't have abortions? Flying spaghetti monster says don't seek out happiness on this earth, but sacrifice yourself to my commands and prepare for an afterlife?



 
Originally posted by: WhipperSnapper
Originally posted by: Atreus21 Birth control systems encourage people to have sex, because it lulls them into believing they can't get pregnant, and that's a lie.

...and that's a problem because? Flying spaghetti monster says don't have sex outside of marriage and don't have abortions? Flying spaghetti monster says don't seek out happiness on this earth, but sacrifice yourself to my commands and prepare for an afterlife?

The Flying Spaghetti monster didn't tell me that lying was wrong. It didn't tell me that killing innocents was wrong. It didn't tell me that people should be held accountable for their decisions. None of this is based, on purpose, on any religion.
 
Back
Top