• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

two quick maths questions for the pros

Status
Not open for further replies.

headRush

Member
well to be honest, im completely stuck on these. help is greatly appreciated, a worked solution would be exquisite.

find all complex numbers z, such that:

az^2 + b(z bar) + c = 0

where z bar is the conjugate of z, and b^2 - 4ac > 0

and.....!

find all complex numbers z such that Re(z^3) < 0, show the solutions graphically in the complex plane. hint: use polar coordinates
 
let z=A+Bi where A,B are real constants and i is well iota

thus az^2+b(z bar) + c = 0 becomes

a(A^2 + 2ABi - B^2) + b(A - Bi) + C = 0 since i^2 =-1 and I think (now its been four years since I did this so I'm likely long) that z bar = A - Bi

Since =0, therefore terms with "i" must equal 0 and terms without "i" must equal 0 as well (0=0+0i), jusst solve for that ya

As for the second one, use the same approach - z = A + Bi

Therefore, z^3 = (A^2 +2ABi - B^2)(A+Bi) = A^3 +2(A^2)Bi - (B^2)A +(A^2)Bi-2(B^2)A - (B^3)i

Collate terms without "i", and the solution is that <0, i.e. A^3 - 3(B^2)A < 0

The graph will be a cubic (edited: before I WRONGLY said it would be a parabola) methinks.

I might have made some silly mistakes in my workings but the method is 100% correct as long as z bar = A - Bi which im prety sure it is.

Cheers :beer:
 
well i've been playing with it for the past few hours (yes, bad mathematician 🙁)

i used the same basic approach as you, except it isn't all equal to 0,

i let z = x+iy (instead of a+ib because we already have a's and b's and its all very confusing 😛)

i said

a(x+iy)^2 + b(x-iy) + c = 0

we then expand it

a(x^2 - y^2 + 2xyi) + bx - byi + c = 0

and equate the real and imaginary parts to the left hand side, which is zero, setting up two simultaneous equations, ie:

a(x^2 - y^2) + bx + c = 0
a(2xy) - by = 0

then we can see that

y(2ax-b) = 0

the trivial case in which y = 0 turns the original equation into

a(x+0i)^2 + b(x-0i) + c = 0

a regular quadratic in x^2, so i discarded this solution

the alternate solution is that:

2ax - b = 0

thus x = b/2a

then i substitute b/2a for x into a(x^2 - y^2) + bx + c = 0

but i cannot find a clean and discrete solution for y 🙁

i have made a genuine attempt at the problem but am not really getting anywhere, so can any of you atot maths geniuses help me out here?
 
I didn't think too much about it, but think about the hint for polar coordinates. Maybe a solution is easier to work out using the trig form of the complex numbers, rather than using rectangular coordinates.

i.e. r = sqrt(a²+b²) and theta = arctan(b/a)
It's very easy to multiply, square, and take roots of complex numbers in the form r(cos(theta) + i sin(theta))

But, I can't recall doing a similar problem & don't really have the time at the moment to work it out to see if this approach would be easier/quicker.
 
well i've solved the first part and it worked out fine, there is no, nice or elegant looking, discrete solution. although i invite others to try.

the part for re(z^3) < 0 is still open, i cannot do it at all.
 
Originally posted by: headRush
well i've solved the first part and it worked out fine, there is no, nice or elegant looking, discrete solution. although i invite others to try.

the part for re(z^3) < 0 is still open, i cannot do it at all.

Remember for your first part, where you have y(2ax-b) = 0 , you have two possibilities:

(i) y = 0
(ii) x = b/2a

Both are EQUALLY GOOD, there's no need (and it would be incorrect) to "discard" the regular quadratic in x^2 for (i). Basically your answer will look like:

If y=0, ....

If x=b/2a, ...

You mention that you solved it, which is great news, just keep in mind not to discard the y=0 solution because its a quadratic. Also, do you remember how to solve quadratics? You should get two values of x from it.

Now onto the Re(z^3) bit, can you provide your workings? I think the answer is in my above post, but it may be better for me to explain it differently. So if you can provide what you are doing, then I can try to find your stumbling block and explain it differently.

Cheers :beer:
 
Originally posted by: DrPizza
I didn't think too much about it, but think about the hint for polar coordinates. Maybe a solution is easier to work out using the trig form of the complex numbers, rather than using rectangular coordinates.

i.e. r = sqrt(a²+b²) and theta = arctan(b/a)
It's very easy to multiply, square, and take roots of complex numbers in the form r(cos(theta) + i sin(theta))

But, I can't recall doing a similar problem & don't really have the time at the moment to work it out to see if this approach would be easier/quicker.

This is a good idea as well.

Ahh brings back memories
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top