While this idea may be somewhat strange to most Americans, how about copying the UK...that is, ban the police from carrying guns? It seems in nearly all these "shootouts" the police are um, shooting back. If the police didn't have the option of shooting, perhaps the confrontation would not have escalated to this point?
While this idea may be somewhat strange to most Americans, how about copying the UK...that is, ban the police from carrying guns? It seems in nearly all these "shootouts" the police are um, shooting back. If the police didn't have the option of shooting, perhaps the confrontation would not have escalated to this point?
While this idea may be somewhat strange to most Americans, how about copying the UK...that is, ban the police from carrying guns? It seems in nearly all these "shootouts" the police are um, shooting back. If the police didn't have the option of shooting, perhaps the confrontation would not have escalated to this point?
we recently lost one. Deranged (I think) guy ran him over with a snowplow.
http://www.thestar.com/news/article/923459--police-gather-to-honour-sgt-ryan-russell
While this idea may be somewhat strange to most Americans, how about copying the UK...that is, ban the police from carrying guns? It seems in nearly all these "shootouts" the police are um, shooting back. If the police didn't have the option of shooting, perhaps the confrontation would not have escalated to this point?
While this idea may be somewhat strange to most Americans, how about copying the UK...that is, ban the police from carrying guns? It seems in nearly all these "shootouts" the police are um, shooting back. If the police didn't have the option of shooting, perhaps the confrontation would not have escalated to this point?