Originally posted by: pipitoto
But which one is better if we forget the prices for a while? I noticed that the 9200 one is 64 bit, but no idea about the fx 5200. Any comments? Thanks.
Play your favorite PC games fast at resolutions up to 2048 x 1536
Originally posted by: Sonic587
Yes, neither is going to be any good for 3D. However, as suggested above, they will be ok for 2D. Save the cash and get the Radeon if you want to deal with the rebate, or go with the 5200 if you don't want a lot of hassle. It's a flip-a-coin decision.
Also, just had to point this out... Marketing BS department working overtime.
Play your favorite PC games fast at resolutions up to 2048 x 1536
I know they want to sell their products, but blatant lies like this makes me sad.
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
Originally posted by: Sonic587
Yes, neither is going to be any good for 3D. However, as suggested above, they will be ok for 2D. Save the cash and get the Radeon if you want to deal with the rebate, or go with the 5200 if you don't want a lot of hassle. It's a flip-a-coin decision.
Also, just had to point this out... Marketing BS department working overtime.
Play your favorite PC games fast at resolutions up to 2048 x 1536
I know they want to sell their products, but blatant lies like this makes me sad.
hehehe that is ultimate BS of the highest degree......6800ultra can play far cry at that res and its FPS is 20-30fps.......some how i think a 64bit 9200 would give up at 800x600 with far cry