100% dependence on others inside the womb vs. 100% dependence on others outside the womb looks like a pretty thin difference.
You're a fucking idiot.
Abortion is legal because a woman has the right to become unpregnant
for the same reasons she as the right to refuse to become pregnant against her will. If you acknowledge that a woman has the right to defend herself from becoming unwillingly pregnant in the first place, then you already support the right to abortion. The right of bodily integrity and autonomy is the same.
Nobody, person or fetus, born or unborn, has the right to occupy the body of another person against that person's will. Nobody, person or fetus, born or unborn, has the right to forcefully extract nourisment from another person's metabolism, nor the right to inject another person with body waste and hormones against that person's will. These are rights enjoyed by
all persons. They are
fundamental, and any waiver of them must be
explicit.
Inside the womb the fetus is
metabolically dependent on
only one person, and outside the womb it is
metabolically dependent on
nobody. That not a "thin" difference. It is a
world of difference. It's existence inside the mother is a state of perpetual violation of the mother's rights, and as a consequence it only exists under the provisional consent afforded it by her refusal to abort it. After birth, none of these conditions exist,
and they are precisely the conditions that make the difference.
I've made these same points to you
several time before, and despite their completely unassailble factual basis, you continue to spruik this bullshit either because you are not smart enough to acknowledge the facts, or you deliberately refuse. Either way, I feel completely justified in telling you to take your ignorant, authoritarian misogyny and shove it up your ass, fucktard.
