• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Twisted Girl Throws Puppies in River

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
If I had to save an animal or a human I would always save the animal first. Always no questions ask. No matter if the human is 1 or 100. If I had enough time to save the human after of course I would. I don't say this lightly either. Even people I know in real life I tell them this in their face. Don't care what someone else thinks about my opinion or decisions. You can't change this.
Your wife/mom/sibling/best friend is hanging off a cliff holding on to your right hand while a stray cat is in the other. You can only pull up one. Which one is it?
 
Your wife/mom/sibling/best friend is hanging off a cliff holding on to your right hand while a stray cat is in the other. You can only pull up one. Which one is it?

So true..... my wife is drowning and my lab that I have trained for hunting and put a ton of hours into taining is with her who do I save? Dumb question! Would I miss the dog/Jake.... bet your ass! But it is my wife!

And you can take it for what it is worth Jake is a great dog and would want it that way.
 
Wrong. He sees through shit stained glasses, as you do. You are a future murderer, perhaps already one. By not saving your fellow human beings and saving a worthless animal, you are already a murderer in your mind, and therefore scum.

No shit stained glasses here. I'm not with him on the saving an animal before the life of a human but the fact that I state that murderers start out with acts of animal cruelty is just that, a fact. A well supported one at that.
 
Which one would you save, the suicide bomber or the dogs that saved 50 U.S. Soldiers? Link
The dog. But you completely changed the circumstances. Pcslookout stated clearly that in all cases he would save the animal.

Edit: Wait wouldn't a suicide bomber already be dead =p
 
Does this actually kill the dogs ? I mean adult dogs can swim, who's to say puppies can't ?

Obviously what she did it still wrong, I can't help but wonder though.
 
Does this actually kill the dogs ? I mean adult dogs can swim, who's to say puppies can't ?

Obviously what she did it still wrong, I can't help but wonder though.

Those dogs might not even be able see anything yet, not to mention that water isn't exactly stagnant..
 
I laughed just because it's so over the top. Throwing puppies into a river sounds like caricature of sadism cliche material.

Like someone could say "I would throw puppies into a river for that graphics card".





Then I started to get sad...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top