Originally posted by: hahher
you said you had leadtek and now have 250/350. how would you compare capture quality (what codec & resolution were you capturing with leadtek)?
For capture quality, I would rate the 250 a good deal higher than the Leadtek. I'm on a somewhat "dirty" cable system, and the 250 + MPEG encoder cleans up the picture a lot better than the Leadtek did, even with its software MPEG encoder. As far as general capturing went, I used MPEG2@640x480 for anything I would watch, and Huffyuv@640x480 for anything I would encode(more on that in a second).
you can edit mpeg2 captures off your 250 without re-encoding right? also, is it difficult to convert 250 captures to divx? (i had problems converting mpeg2 captures off leadtek tuner) Can you simply open the file in vdub-mpeg2 and convert?
The software MPEG2 encoder included with the Leadtek is sort of "odd", in that it produces what I've now learned is a "DVD stream" type video stream, instead of a "program stream" type stream. The former is designed for effeciency(I guess), but when you try to chop it up with Vdub(or similar tools), the audio goes out of sync. So, when I wanted to record something that I wanted to encode, I did the initial recording using the Huffyuv codec, which is lossless.
With the 250 set to program stream(DVD stream is also an option here), I can easily do Divx/Xvid encodes in Vdub. As for just doing edits, I've never tried to do just an edit in Vdub, but I don't think it can be done with just that tool, since Vdub needs to write out a new file, and it can't write MPEG2 files.