Turning America blue - College towns pouring acid on the Repugs

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,076
2,635
136
I hope there's zero traction for raising the voting age. What an ignorant, foolish, destructive thing to do! Republicans are a shameless lot.

26th Amendment - Right to Vote at Age 18

View attachment 83767
The National Constitution Center
https://constitutioncenter.org › amendment-xxvi


SECTION. 1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States ...
What I don't understand is why its legal for elderly people to vote by mail in many states without any questions but not young people? Seems discriminatory and if anything its the young people who most benefit from mail in voting as they are working members of society.
 

Zor Prime

Golden Member
Nov 7, 1999
1,039
615
136
It's also the main reason they want to raise the minimum voting age, to take Collage students entirely out of the picture.
It should be raised to whatever the drinking age is. So you can vote and potentially change the entire world by doing so but you cannot buy booze? Same with getting in the military. It doesn't make a lick of sense.

Or drop the drinking age back down to 18 and carry on. =)
 

akugami

Diamond Member
Feb 14, 2005
6,210
2,551
136
While I get the shift to the left by the next generation. But still plenty of MAGAtard young adults at R conventions.

Indoctrination. They're taught to be stupid from a young age.

The GQP leadership are not stupid. They know indoctrination works. They're working hard to raise the next generation of Magatards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo and Muse

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,157
12,606
136
It should be raised to whatever the drinking age is. So you can vote and potentially change the entire world by doing so but you cannot buy booze? Same with getting in the military. It doesn't make a lick of sense.

Or drop the drinking age back down to 18 and carry on. =)
If the congress and POTUS can send you off to die in the name of the country, then yes you should get a say in that. Thus, voting at 18.

Being able to drink alcohol has nothing to do with that.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
40,529
10,011
136
If the congress and POTUS can send you off to die in the name of the country, then yes you should get a say in that. Thus, voting at 18.

Being able to drink alcohol has nothing to do with that.
The incarcerated should have the right to vote, period. If you're old enough to be in the military too. Alcohol? Different issue there. I don't think immature people should be drinkers, alcohol will not help them mature.
 

NWRMidnight

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2001
3,524
3,049
136
If the congress and POTUS can send you off to die in the name of the country, then yes you should get a say in that. Thus, voting at 18.

Being able to drink alcohol has nothing to do with that.

The two have literally nothing to do with each other.
They have everything to do with each other.

I had a long response written up, but I decided to scrap it and just say: being able to die for your country, vote, and drink are not mutually exclusive. They all go hand in hand as they all require some basic level of maturity, where the consequences have a lasting effect on society. Yet, you can join the military, put your life on the line, at the age of 18, but you can't have beer afterwards because there is the misconception that drinking takes a higher basic level of maturity... which is bullshit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zor Prime

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,443
33,034
136
Drinking takes no maturity at all. The argument for raising the drinking age to 19 was to remove legal alcohol from high school students, a position I understand. The 21 drinking age is stupid and I see no rational basis for it.

<honest dick mode> I'd raise the drinking age to seventy. You want to be a bum? Do it when no one cares if you're a bum.</dick mode>
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,157
12,606
136
They have everything to do with each other.

I had a long response written up, but I decided to scrap it and just say: being able to die for your country, vote, and drink are not mutually exclusive. They all go hand in hand as they all require some basic level of maturity, where the consequences have a lasting effect on society. Yet, you can join the military, put your life on the line, at the age of 18, but you can't have beer afterwards because there is the misconception that drinking takes a higher basic level of maturity... which is bullshit.
The government can't force you to drink beer, but it can force you to die for the country (conscription)
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
I hope there's zero traction for raising the voting age. What an ignorant, foolish, destructive thing to do! Republicans are a shameless lot.

26th Amendment - Right to Vote at Age 18

View attachment 83767
The National Constitution Center
https://constitutioncenter.org › amendment-xxvi


SECTION. 1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States ...
I personally think the AOC, specifically voting should should be lowered to 16.
 

NWRMidnight

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2001
3,524
3,049
136
The government can't force you to drink beer, but it can force you to die for the country (conscription)
How would the government force people to die for the country when there is currently no law that allows a draft at this time? The draft WAS nothing but a law, that was repealed after the Vietnam War. It would take an act of Congress to reinstate the draft, which would require a new law to be drafted. The draft is nothing more than a law, regulating how the military gets it's members, which is currently thru selective service (volunteer) per the law, just like the drinking age, is one of many ways of regulating alcohol use in this country. Laws that can be repealed, updated, or completely changed at any time by Congress. Technically, Congress could pass a law that requires every American adult to drink a glass of red wine per day because of the benefits, or what every reason they put forth. I am not saying it would pass constitutional scrutiny, that's a completely different argument. But thank you for demonstrating how the drinking age, voting, joining the military, etc are all go hand in hand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zor Prime

Zor Prime

Golden Member
Nov 7, 1999
1,039
615
136
The two have literally nothing to do with each other.
Fenix said basically the same.

Yes, they do. There's a presumption that someone isn't mentally prepped to utilize alcohol until they're 21 but you're allowed to vote at 18 which has massively larger, potential world-ending implications? With alcohol you might drive around drunk and kill an entire family on the road, or you can vote for someone and an entire country gets wiped out, or worse, the world. Obviously, nobody can be trusted to vote until they're 21 or whatever the legal drinking age is due to an established maturity level guideline (drinking age.)

They have everything to do with one another. I'm not even saying raise the voting age, I'm saying it should be pegged with drinking age, be it 18, 3 years old, or whatever the government sees fit as being mature enough to handle. If this concept goes over the head of the reader then I don't know how to lay it out in any simpler way for consumption. If you get what I'm saying and simply don't agree, that's fine.
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,255
136
They have everything to do with each other.

I had a long response written up, but I decided to scrap it and just say: being able to die for your country, vote, and drink are not mutually exclusive. They all go hand in hand as they all require some basic level of maturity, where the consequences have a lasting effect on society. Yet, you can join the military, put your life on the line, at the age of 18, but you can't have beer afterwards because there is the misconception that drinking takes a higher basic level of maturity... which is bullshit.
And if 18-20 year olds care that much, they can vote for a lower drinking age. A single vote rarely leads to death, underage drinking often does.

Military is voluntary now, so I think that is a moot point.
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,255
136
Fenix said basically the same.

Yes, they do. There's a presumption that someone isn't mentally prepped to utilize alcohol until they're 21 but you're allowed to vote at 18 which has massively larger, potential world-ending implications? With alcohol you might drive around drunk and kill an entire family on the road, or you can vote for someone and an entire country gets wiped out, or worse, the world. Obviously, nobody can be trusted to vote until they're 21 or whatever the legal drinking age is due to an established maturity level guideline (drinking age.)

They have everything to do with one another. I'm not even saying raise the voting age, I'm saying it should be pegged with drinking age, be it 18, 3 years old, or whatever the government sees fit as being mature enough to handle. If this concept goes over the head of the reader then I don't know how to lay it out in any simpler way for consumption. If you get what I'm saying and simply don't agree, that's fine.
It takes one drunken night to kill a family drunk driving. It takes about 75,000,000 votes to elect a president.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
40,529
10,011
136
Technically, Congress could pass a law that requires every American adult to drink a glass of red wine per day because of the benefits, or what every reason they put forth. I am not saying it would pass constitutional scrutiny, that's a completely different argument. But thank you for demonstrating how the drinking age, voting, joining the military, etc are all go hand in hand.
Drinking a glass of red wine may have benefits (I don't believe this has been established), but ethyl alcohol is toxic, that has been established.
 

NWRMidnight

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2001
3,524
3,049
136
And if 18-20 year olds care that much, they can vote for a lower drinking age. A single vote rarely leads to death, underage drinking often does.

Military is voluntary now, so I think that is a moot point
Whoosh!!! You not only are missing the point as well, you are also confused. That is apparent when you claim the Military is a moot point, because it's voluntary now. Being Voluntary doesn't matter. Everything we are talking about is all based on current laws, that can be changed by Congress at any moment. The drinking age can be changed, having a volunteer Military can change, even the voting age can be changed if Congress amends the constitution. But what this discussion boils down to, is really about is the basic maturity level of being capable of making rational decisions.. Be it consuming alcohol responsibly, joining the military, or voting. But making a rational decision also requires understanding fully of the consequences of that choice, which is part of maturity.. or is it? Unless a person has seen actual Combat, stood up on the line defending this country in real life and death situations, most don't fully grasp the full reality of the real consequences of that choice, this includes many who have joined the military.

You are ignoring the fact that you can join the military, go out and put your life on the line, yet, you can't have drink if you are between the ages of 17 and 21. As if somehow drinking alcohol requires more maturity, more understanding of the consequences of the choices made, than joining the military and putting your life on the line for this country, or even voting for that matter. But in all reality, drinking alcohol responsibly takes the least amount of maturity and understanding of the consequences, out of all three, partially because it has the least long term impact on the country, the world, and society in general for that matter. Yet, it's put on a platform as if it requires the most maturity, understanding of the consequences, and has the largest impact on this country, the world, and society in general., when it doesn't.
 
Last edited:

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,255
136
You are ignoring the fact that you can join the military, go out and put your life on the line, yet, you can't have drink if you are between the ages of 17 and 21. As if somehow drinking alcohol requires more maturity, more understanding of the consequences of the choices made, than joining the military and putting your life on the line for this country, or even voting for that matter. But in all reality, drinking alcohol responsibly takes the least amount of maturity and understanding of the consequences, out of all three, partially because it has the least long term impact on the country, the world, and society in general for that matter. Yet, it's put on a platform as if it requires the most maturity, understanding of the consequences, and has the largest impact on this country, the world, and society in general., when it doesn't.
The military intentionally recruits the young because they aren't fully mentally mature yet and suck at evaluating long term risks.

The maturity that evaluates risks of drinking vs evaluating policy of a politician is not the same. It is a stupid comparison made by people that value alcohol way too much. I hope you are at least consistent and believe that anyone that has ever made a bad decision with alcohol losses their right to vote. Kids voting are generally picking between two options, they aren't single handedly picking the president. They can, though, very much single handed kill a family while drunk driving.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muse

NWRMidnight

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2001
3,524
3,049
136
The military intentionally recruits the young because they aren't fully mentally mature yet and suck at evaluating long term risks.

The maturity that evaluates risks of drinking vs evaluating policy of a politician is not the same. It is a stupid comparison made by people that value alcohol way too much. I hope you are at least consistent and believe that anyone that has ever made a bad decision with alcohol losses their right to vote. Kids voting are generally picking between two options, they aren't single handedly picking the president. They can, though, very much single handed kill a family while drunk driving.
But they are the same thing.. It's not a stupid comparison, and the value someone puts on alcohol has nothing to do with it. As I said before, they all require a basic level of maturity, which is what it's all about. Maturity is is having the ability to evaluate short and long term risks, the consequences (Good or bad), and what could happen from the choice they make, and making the correct choice. Non of which are black and white. That applies to consuming alcohol, that applies to voting, and it applies to joining and being in the Military. You are correct, however, the military exploits the lack of maturity to fill the ranks, but that doesn't change the fact that it still requires a basic level of maturity, whether the lack of maturity is being exploited or not.

You are actually proving my point. People shouldn't be in the military if they are not mature enough to do so. As I believe being in the Military requires a level of maturity greater than the level required to consuming alcohol. Because being in the Military, they are saying I am okay with standing up and possibly dying for this country, and they are also okay with shooting and killing people in the process. They are making a conscience decision to do that. Nobody makes a conscience decision to consume alcohol for the purpose of killing anyone.

There is also much, much, much more to voting than just evaluating a candidates policies. A person's vote can have lasting effects to the country, and the world, both short term and long term. Which can possibly be devastating consequences if they get it wrong, much more than consuming alcohol. That doesn't change if a person is single handily make the decision, or if it's thousands of people involved in the decision. A person's vote matters, and that single vote can change the trajectory of the future. That one vote can determine if nobody dies, or hundreds of people die in the long term depending on what direction the government takes us.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
25,866
15,318
136
Drinking takes no maturity at all. The argument for raising the drinking age to 19 was to remove legal alcohol from high school students, a position I understand. The 21 drinking age is stupid and I see no rational basis for it.

<honest dick mode> I'd raise the drinking age to seventy. You want to be a bum? Do it when no one cares if you're a bum.</dick mode>
Dude… my eyes.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
25,866
15,318
136
Are you not supposed to drink red wine when receiving jesus and whatnot?

So no religion until 21? I can get behind that idea…
 
  • Like
Reactions: akugami

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,618
30,145
136
Are you not supposed to drink red wine when receiving jesus and whatnot?

So no religion until 21? I can get behind that idea…

“Real” Christians use grape juice.

(Southern Baptists). The people who claim to want to live by the literal word of the Bible (well except for all the woke parts)