Originally posted by: randomlinh
gotta agree with him here.. isn't this common sense? Given how hot these things run, I'd figure it'd be pricey to leave them running. On the flip side, in the winter are tv area is nice and warm =)
The real question should be "when I turn off my system, am I really turning it off?" A lot of people don't realize their stuff is just going into standby.
True. My space is considerably cooler now that I sold one of my GTX 280s out of my SLI rig to fund the purchase of my 360.
...I assume that anything that you can turn "on" with a remote control is actually in standby when you turn it "off". Which, is pretty much everything these days.
Originally posted by: ducci
I know I should probably be killing power entirely to my TV and such, but I have my DVR/Cable box/etc. So meh.
I have everything, except my DVR/cable box on a switched outlet.
I also have our file/print/media server and printer attached to a SmartStrip.
http://www.smarthomeusa.com/Sh...rt-Energy/Smart-Strip/
The box has WOL, and I have a WOL shortcut on the desktop of all the other PCs to wake up the server. We don't use the server like 99.9% of the time, so this is an easy way to make it consume less power. The Smartstrip works great with WOL.
I didn't care for the SmartStrip for the TV/entertainment system because it has a slight delay when turning on, which prevented our Harmony 550 remote from turning everything one with any consistency. Putting everything except the DVR/Cable box on the switched outlet works much better.
...the only thing I leave on 24/7 is the mac mini, although it is in sleep mode most of the time.
Originally posted by: mugs
It is common sense, but a lot of people leave them on anyway. In particular, I wonder if people realize how much it costs to run folding on their PS3 when it's not in use. Considering how much people complain about the cost of games going up $10 or Microsoft charging for XBL Gold, I wonder if people realize how much power their consoles are consuming.
And also, I was really surprised by how little power the Wii uses, even if it is less advanced technology.
Very good point about folding, SETI, etc... Distributed computing also means distributed cost.
Given the cost differences between Xenon and Falcon 360s that are left on, I am assuming that process size/tech have little to do with the power draw. My immediate guess for the big differences between the Wii and PS3/X360 are due to the fact that the Wii doesn't have a hard drive.