palehorse
Lifer
I disagree. It is possible to commit acts of terror against innocent civilians while wearing a uniform (ie. ethnic cleansing).Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: palehorse74
oh christ... get a frickin grip dude.Originally posted by: Aimster
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Of course Turkey has the right, and a good reason, to go after the Kurdish rebels. However, that doesn't mean that this incursion is a good thing. My post was simple and to the point: that point being that this does not bode well for stability in the region.Originally posted by: Aimster
Originally posted by: palehorse74
DOH! not good...
why? You claim Israel had every right to do it.
Go on cheer Turkey.
I'm waiting
wtf does Israel have to do with this situation? get a grip mr. hezbollah. sheesh...
& an incursion of Israel into Lebanon is stable for the region? You supported that 100%.
Hezbollah is an Islamic militant group.
Like I said you are nothing but a bigot.
Funny how when it comes to Muslims doing the same thing you aren't defending their actions with all you got, but when Israel does it you will defend it always.
I'm just pointing out your closed-minded thinking process.
For the record, I support ANYONE who goes after terrorists, regardless of their faith or ideology - that includes Turkey, Israel, India, Jordan, Egypt, Pakistan (sometimes), etc.
I classify a terrorist as any fighter who intentionally targets innocent civilians. (Hamas, Hezbollah, some Kurdish rebels, AQ, etc).
There is more to add onto just targeting innocent civilians.
Terrorist is any fighter who intentionally targets innocent civilians, who does not wear the military uniform of their country therefore shielding themselves among the normal population and softening any repercussions their acts of war has on their home country.
The only difference is that it is a lot easier to find and destroy the terrorists who wear uniforms.